SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> what??
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1485121138

Message started by thumperclone on 01/22/17 at 13:38:58

Title: what??
Post by thumperclone on 01/22/17 at 13:38:58

Conway, Trumps' counselor said the press secretary was using
"alternative facts" when talking about the crowd at the swearing in

lets see what alternative facts can mean:
lies
untruths
made up carp
erroneous perception
fake ???

"Just the facts mam" Sgt. Joe Friday ;D

Title: Re: what??
Post by pg on 01/22/17 at 14:04:05

How about the time reporter who said Trump removed the MLK bust from the oval office.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/21/trump-calls-out-time-magazine-for-fake-news-story-about-removing-mlk-bust-from-oval-office/

Regarding Conways statements, make up your own mind.

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZewmkqygDes[/media]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZewmkqygDes

Best regards,

Title: Re: what??
Post by thumperclone on 01/22/17 at 14:22:26

I need a universal translator ;D

Title: Re: what??
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/22/17 at 14:39:20

Off to a very disingenuous start.

If it's a small crowd, OWN IT. Don't start telling lies. And don't Justify todays lies To the world on yesterday's Possible ,simple mistake.. The MLK bust was out of the reporters view..
I'm disappointed,, downright disappointed.
How much easier to simply acknowledge that the crowd is small?
Did the potential for meeting up with rioting moonbats affect the crowd size?
The potential for rain?
Don't go pretending that just with a statement contrary to reality that somehow reality is changed.
We've watched that psychosis played out for years and years in D.C. , both sides.

Title: Re: what??
Post by raydawg on 01/22/17 at 14:53:08

As I already reported, about how my hearing lost gave way for me to discern people via other methods than just plain linguistics.....

Looking for the root cause as to why someone needs to exaggerate readily proven truth.....
I would lean toward the man really does have a small thingy :-[

BTW, all the fish I catch are HUGE ;D

Title: Re: what??
Post by Joer0952 on 01/22/17 at 14:57:14

77686E6974734272427A68642F1D0 wrote:

Well I agree about the crowd, but simple mistake, so you don't think that they are looking for anything to complain about with Trump? Its called simply checking to see if what you think is true is indeed so before you publish a story, but why would they do that when they are only out to trash Trump. Why let the truth get in the way, its a leftist philosophy. Its the same reason why they are discussing something so inconsequential as the crowd size. If this was Barry they would have double and triple checked it, if they even cared to report it in the first place.

Title: Re: what??
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/22/17 at 15:14:32

Ohh, they Are looking, but why just Hand it to them?
I don't see how it's just a simple mistake. It sounds like trying to put s p in on a clear and demonstrable fact..
Maybe I don't hear so good,either.

Title: Re: what??
Post by Joer0952 on 01/22/17 at 15:58:16

293630372A2D1C2C1C24363A71430 wrote:

When I said simple mistake I was referring to you calling the MLK thing a simple mistake

Title: Re: what??
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/22/17 at 16:09:22

Yeah, I have no reason to believe that reporter was Seeing the bust and Reporting that it's not there.
We've just seen what happens when someone tries to just define truth when it's a provable thing..

Hey, lefties,, aren't you surprised?

Title: Re: what??
Post by Joer0952 on 01/22/17 at 18:09:01

312E282F32350434043C2E22695B0 wrote:

I don't believe the reporter saw it and reported it wasn't there either, but I do think that he didn't see it and without further investigation his eyes got wide and his mouth started to water and he said to himself "I got trump now" and reported it. This is the problem with modern main stream media, they are so filled with hatred and out to get trump that they don't do their job and investigate before they print a negative story

Title: Re: what??
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/22/17 at 18:21:12

It's not hard to ascribe that thinking to him, but I don't Know, and it's really kinda counterproductive for anyone to report something that can and will be proven wrong in hours.
But, he Really should have satisfied himself that the bust was gone.. sloppy work.
If people suffered consequences for such, it would cease.

Title: Re: what??
Post by Joer0952 on 01/23/17 at 00:24:09

57484E4954536252625A48440F3D0 wrote:

If news stories quickly proven wrong stop spreading then the whole $.77 on a dollar women wages myth would have stopped along time ago

Title: Re: what??
Post by WebsterMark on 01/23/17 at 05:17:08

The story I read was the lie was started by a "reporter" looking at a photo of Trump's first few minutes behind the desk. The mlk bust was hidden behind a group of people standing near an open door, so it wasn't visible in the photo. The "reporter" who must have been in the oval office before, didn't see the mlk bust so he assumed the racist Trump removed it. Actually, the bust had been moved to another table and the Churchhill bust was put in its place.
That says a great deal about the press and their blind spots to obama and the mirages they see when looking at Trump.

Title: Re: what??
Post by MnSpring on 01/23/17 at 11:17:49

63464C5B19101C1B290 wrote:

" ... but I do think that he didn't see it and without further investigation his eyes got wide and his mouth started to water and he said to himself "I got trump now" and reported it."

That is the Point !

The, ‘reporter’ was Just Pure, LAZY !!!!!!!
And, (as was also said)
Their is, 'NO Responsibility of action, or Consequences of actions’.

"... they are so filled with hatred and out to get trump that they don't do their job and investigate before they print a negative story..."

And, because they, (reporter), has, ‘LEARNED”,
their is, ‘NO Responsibility of action, or Consequences of actions’,
They will, Continue to do ‘What EVER, ’they’, want.
After all:
‘What does it matter”

Title: Re: what??
Post by Joer0952 on 01/23/17 at 12:58:38

6744795A5843444D2A0 wrote:

[quote author=63464C5B19101C1B290 link=1485121138/0#9 date=1485137341]" ... but I do think that he didn't see it and without further investigation his eyes got wide and his mouth started to water and he said to himself "I got trump now" and reported it."

Title: Re: what??
Post by MnSpring on 01/23/17 at 13:24:16

496C6671333A3631030 wrote:

"And when they realize its wrong the put in a little tiny disclaimer under the big headline of the lie

LOLOOOLOLOLOLO

Many years ago, went to a play at the ‘Guthrie’ Theater.
It was, ‘Front Page’.

Never forget the scene, when the ‘cub’ reporter, was talking to the grizzled veteran.
The ‘Cub’ reporter: ’Sir, yesterday I wrote something, and today I need to print a, retraction”.
The ‘Boss” said: “Son, if every reporter was to print a retraction, today's newspaper, would just be a, footnote, of yesterdays newspaper”.

Thinking, a little faster, and easier, to ‘report’, what the ‘facts’ are today.
However, today, the, Responsibility/Consequences of actions,
have become, even, LESS !!!!!!