|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> your prez /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1490808777 Message started by thumperclone on 03/29/17 at 10:32:57 |
|
Title: your prez Post by thumperclone on 03/29/17 at 10:32:57 tweety has been involved in 4 thousand yes 4 THOUSAND lawsuits currently there are 75 pending this is the bozo who wants to run the country like a company he is NOT my president |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by Paraquat on 03/29/17 at 11:07:41 http://https://dumptrumpdumptrump.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/not-300x232.jpg How many times have Google, Apple, IBM, or Walmart been sued? Are those good companies? --Steve |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/29/17 at 11:22:22 Ohh, the horror.. I Wonder why you don't complain about his POLICIES. Plenty to criticize there. Real issues, things that actually affect all of us. Is it because the media have dumbed America down to the petty sound bites? |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by Serowbot on 03/29/17 at 11:25:05 He's Putin's president, that's for sure... ;D |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by thumperclone on 03/29/17 at 11:42:12 3B242225383F0E3E0E36242863510 wrote:
policies like: trump care failed the wall waste of money no real security benefit saving carrier jobs false his only real policy is self promotion |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/29/17 at 12:58:15 Go get the Whole list. What is your problem? Get real. He's acting like a neocon. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by verslagen1 on 03/29/17 at 13:04:10 293528302D382F3E313233385D0 wrote:
This is probably fake news... so don't read it... http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/indiana-board-set-to-endorse-7m-carrier-deal-trump-brokered |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by Papa Bear on 03/29/17 at 13:48:17 He's going to make a great omelette - right now he's just cracking a few eggs and making a mess. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by verslagen1 on 03/29/17 at 14:04:42 1E1F10111213141516270 wrote:
He's just a rookie. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by raydawg on 03/29/17 at 14:24:03 Remember back to Obama and his first administration..... Rush remarked he hoped he, Obama, failed.... The media was livid. How can an American hope for such? So darn funny to watch this soap opera unfold. Only question I have is does your panties stick to your crack just as much folded, as not? Let Trump fail on his own accord if it's that's bad... Pretty simple if you believe in what you say :-* |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by pg on 03/29/17 at 15:50:45 tweety has been involved in 4 thousand yes 4 THOUSAND lawsuits currently there are 75 pending It sounds excessive, but it is just part of doing business at a casino or high end property. Patrons, employees, contractors, everyone who can create or find an angle will do so. 50 to 100 lawsuits a year would be about par level per property, no kidding. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/29/17 at 16:14:51 Try to read. INVOLVED doesn't mean Being sued. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by pg on 03/29/17 at 16:51:41 2700 Lawsuits directly attributed to gaming, resort, golf industries. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by oldNslow on 03/29/17 at 17:07:48 7E696F636C7C0E0 wrote:
Wonder how many were filed by folks who got sh*t faced, toppled off a bar stool and hurt themselves in one of the casinos or resorts, and decided to take a crack at a settlement. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/29/17 at 18:06:42 It would require real investigation to know enough to have an opinion. Innuendo is enough for some. Comey ADMITTED that Hillary should be prosecuted. But, the lefties are blind to that. Losses, bankruptcies, nobody KNOWS enough to say what happened. But, it's Juicy,, and that is enough for lefties. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by Paraquat on 03/30/17 at 05:43:00 405C415944514657585B5A51340 wrote:
It's been two months. --Steve |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/30/17 at 07:17:21 How long did it take for the lefties to screw it up? How many bubs actually oppose Trump? You REALLY think he's not being resisted by bubs , dems and at every opportunity, the media? And he's supposed to clean up Your mess ,and get the stain and stench outta the carpet in just two months? Stay focused on the trivial. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by Trippah on 03/30/17 at 07:46:50 Could you please cite the Comey "admitted Hilary should be prosecuted " comment. I never heard it, or read it. (I really do not care, I am glad she is not Pres; but I would like to see or read the actual Comey comment. TIA :) |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/30/17 at 08:25:26 Go listen to the laundry list of lies she told. He admitted that anyone who found themselves in the same position wouldn't be able to expect to not be prosecuted. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by Trippah on 03/30/17 at 12:26:13 I have already done my laundry, when and how exactly did the FBI director admit Hill the Pill should be prosecuted.??? I am not into rumors, as a rule. ;D |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by verslagen1 on 03/30/17 at 12:30:08 60465D4444555C340 wrote:
This was cited here many times (mostly by jog) but here you go... http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/fbi-director-doesnt-recommend-charges-against-hillary-clinton/index.html |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/30/17 at 13:21:32 Trip, I've inundated you with obvious fact. You somehow manage to avoid reaching the obvious conclusions. 2+2= fish |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by T And T Garage on 03/30/17 at 15:25:39 796578607D687F6E616263680D0 wrote:
Once again... A-MEN!!! |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/30/17 at 15:47:43 The Emergency dodge the truth post. Keep screaming.. it's getting funnier. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by MnSpring on 03/30/17 at 18:08:58 362A372F322730212E2D2C27420 wrote:
“ Wanna BE KING, Bam a” Was NOT My President !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In, 11 times, voting for a POTUS, have NEVER Seen such out and out, Fabricated LIES. And Grasping at, 'straws'. Sure, their have been the Comedies/Parodies, Of others. But NEVER, seen so many, "Standing in the Street, and CRYING”, people. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/30/17 at 18:26:48 607364657A7771737827160 wrote:
This was cited here many times (mostly by jog) but here you go... http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/fbi-director-doesnt-recommend-charges-against-hillary-clinton/index.html[/quote] You ignored it every time I posted it. But, demanded the facts. Will you pretend this doesn't say what it says? |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by Trippah on 03/30/17 at 19:27:53 It is an interesting report by the Director, and thanks as I missed it..guess I'm getting too old. Previously on tv all I had heard was mishandling (putting on a private server) of information on the that was later upgraded in classification was found. Hmmm, well, after Benghazi she had lost any chance as far as I was concerned. I do not understand, is the Director saying no one has ever been prosecuted for releasing classified information, or that no one has ever been prosecuted for putting classified information on a private server (which he reports was never compromised)? |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/30/17 at 20:33:48 The takeaway is He listed reason after reason to prosecute her, then said the FBI wouldn't recommend charges. The detective gathers evidence. The DA decides. But, when a Clinton is involved, rules change. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by Trippah on 03/31/17 at 06:29:07 As Forest Gump so wisely put it, "Stupid is as stupid does." Why the government even would allow an official to use an unofficial system to work official business is way beyond me. So she did, and they found many examples of classified info being sent on her server but apparently since the server was secure (in that it was never b reached) makes it not a crime since she never divulged classified info. This is my take on the situation. Thus, no actionable crime was committed, thus no prosecution was recommended. I no not see shadow governments etc, only a sidestepping of rational behavior and, government being all to much like business sometimes, no one in the organization would tell the boss to use the government system. How many snakes can you fit in one city? |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/31/17 at 06:43:21 Anyone who didn't pay attention to everything might conclude as you did. Leaving classified information in an unsecured location is a crime, whether it is taken by anyone or not. Failure to protect the information is a crime. It was not a secure server. They COULDN'T prosecute her Without revealing the fact that EVERYONE she communicated with was also engaged in breaking the law. Does it really not send up a red flag that Bill Clinton was talking to the AG? Your wife is being investigated by the county sheriff, and You go visit the DA? You know how that would work out? The DA takes the evidence that the detective gathers and decides if they have enough to indict. Comey ADMITTED that ANYONE ELSE in the Same situation would have No Reason to believe that THEY would not be prosecuted. Admit it. She Should have been indicted. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by WebsterMark on 03/31/17 at 06:51:57 Comey did not indict her because, much like Roberts did with the Obamacare ruling, he did not want to basically be the one to decide the Presidential election. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/31/17 at 07:02:16 It wasn't Comeys place to indict or not. The Attorney General does that. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by T And T Garage on 03/31/17 at 15:49:12 Because this is a competent president, huh? http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/326796-trump-appears-to-forget-to-sign-executive-orders BWAAAHAAHAAHAAAA!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/31/17 at 16:02:38 I'll ship you some new straws. All that clutching you're doing has got your collection about crushed. Why focus on trivial crap? He's actually WRONG in some important places and you people are all wigged out over the silliest crap. Human foibles, geeze, I bet if he farted and you could prove it that would be enough to impeach him over. And Hillary's still the saint. You people are pathetic. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by T And T Garage on 03/31/17 at 16:18:06 4A555354494E7F4F7F47555912200 wrote:
Who said hillary was a saint??? Not this guy. She was/is simply the lesser of two evils. (I'd rather have a trained surgeon who was being sued for malpractice operate on me than a game show host...) BTW, yeah, I get it... the war powers blah, blah, blah - this is a distraction yadda, yadda, yadda.... The fact is - at this moment - that does not matter. The orange tweeter is setting up to fleece the average American and none of his supporters seem to care. Why does no one get this? There's a secretary of state that is worth $500B to the russians... War powers?? What??? This is either the beginning of the end (of our democracy), or the mercy killing of the two party system. I hope it's the latter.... Oh, by the way - you don't have to refer to me as "you people" - you should reserve that phrase for people of color that you have so much respect for.... right? |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by MnSpring on 03/31/17 at 18:54:18 Two ways to look at a situation. One, like Frankton, Total Broke, in fact Deep in Debt, and Now, a Multi Millionaire? (After his, ‘Fixed’, election) STILL, want to see, HIS, Taxes !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or, the Person/s, who have ALREADY, made, Millions. Which one is going to, bow down, and tug their forelocks, and say : “Yes Sir, Yes Sir, Yes Sir”, and DO What that are TOLD to do, so they can Put Millions, of YOUR TAX Dollars, in THEIR POCKET ? Gosh, would it be like a person, who makes a bunch of MONEY, in the Rail Roads he owns, (To HAUL OIL) Who, pays the likes of ‘Frankton’, to SAY. “No Pipeline” Because is would seriously cut into his business? For the next 4 years, Trump, IS, my President. And after, and ONLY, after, will see. This, "TRASHING”, has gone Way BEYOND, the, “Dan” Quayle" Jokes. Get on the Bus, or stand in the street and, CRY ! |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by pg on 03/31/17 at 18:59:44 2B353A3B362B302D5F0 wrote:
How about some more info or a link? I did a google search and their was very little detailed info. I'm starting to think this is just another one of the left's BS talking points. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/31/17 at 21:01:00 You people are clueless. Hillary is the very definition of corrupt and a warmonger. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by thumperclone on 04/01/17 at 00:56:47 5A454344595E6F5F6F57454902300 wrote:
you seem to be the classless one Hillary has nothing to do with tweetys maladroitness |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/01/17 at 06:22:08 Finally, down to the truth. As long as it's well delivered, polished, stiff upper lip, old boy,, it's okay. Trump IS a clod. He doesn't Have the measured cadence of a politician. Thank God. Im not here to gain acceptance. I'm here pointing out why your thinking is wrong. War Powers is no distraction. It's very important and relevant to the situation we are in. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by Serowbot on 04/01/17 at 07:19:57 Hillary was accused of using poor security measures that might possibly have been compromised by an enemy... Trump is accused of collusion with the enemy... You tell me which is worse. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/01/17 at 08:23:41 She was Proven to have done what she was accused of. There is exactly Zero evidence on Trump. Even some dems have said so |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by raydawg on 04/01/17 at 08:24:37 3A242B2A273A213C4E0 wrote:
Who said hillary was a saint??? Not this guy. She was/is simply the lesser of two evils. (I'd rather have a trained surgeon who was being sued for malpractice operate on me than a game show host...) BTW, yeah, I get it... the war powers blah, blah, blah - this is a distraction yadda, yadda, yadda.... The fact is - at this moment - that does not matter. The orange tweeter is setting up to fleece the average American and none of his supporters seem to care. Why does no one get this? There's a secretary of state that is worth $500B to the russians... War powers?? What??? This is either the beginning of the end (of our democracy), or the mercy killing of the two party system. I hope it's the latter.... Oh, by the way - you don't have to refer to me as "you people" - you should reserve that phrase for people of color that you have so much respect for.... right? [/quote] FAIL...... Your comparison is apple and oranges. Hillary has a long history of malpractice in her field, some resulting in death. Trump has never visited that occupation before You want to, and of course you do, for it's all you got, to open the scope to observe credentials to what's needed to be president in order to find charge against Trump... Go for it, but expect to have the same scrunity returned. And when it is, please, don't whine PC tears! I agree Trump is no politician that we have been led to believe ( that) makes a politician.... But look at where those career qualified pimps have taken us..... And yet, some are willing to let them continue to perform lobotomies on them because they are the lessor of two evils... That makes no sense and just continues the insanity of failure. Do we have the right "doctor" there now? I doubt it, however, we can say as fact it's a change from the ones who kept botching the other operations.... Try pretending just once you are not suing them for malpractice, even tho your testimony gives fact that you have substantial proof.... |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by T And T Garage on 04/01/17 at 08:43:17 4A555354494E7F4F7F47555912200 wrote:
My analogy works perfectly, thanks. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by T And T Garage on 04/01/17 at 13:16:07 796E68646B7B090 wrote:
How about some more info or a link? I did a google search and their was very little detailed info. I'm starting to think this is just another one of the left's BS talking points. Best regards,[/quote] Oh really?? Go there and put this phrase in "tillerson 500 billion deal with russia" Here are the results: Did Putin help elect Trump to restore $500 billion Exxon oil deal killed ... https://thinkprogress.org/putin-helped-trump-exxon-oil-deal-sanctions-6f169c4a4cd0 Jan 8, 2017 - Russia's $500 billion oil deal with Exxon was killed by U.S. sanctions. ... Trump, and ExxonMobil, whose CEO Rex Tillerson — an extreme ... Rex Tillerson's Company, Exxon, Has Billions at Stake Over Sanctions ... https://www.nytimes.com/.../rex-tillersons-company-exxon-has-billions-at-stake-over-rus... Dec 12, 2016 - Russian officials have optimistically called the agreement a $500 billion deal. As for Mr. Tillerson personally, he was scheduled to retire next ... How Rex Tillerson Changed His Tune on Russia and Came to Court ... https://www.nytimes.com/.../russia-rex-tillerson-donald-trump-secretary-of-state.html Dec 20, 2016 - The payoff for Exxon was immense: a $500 billion joint venture in 2011 ... medal on Mr. Tillerson's suit not long after he signed the Arctic deal. $500 billion opportunity for Exxon, Russia in Trump cabinet pick ... www.msnbc.com/.../-500-billion-opportunity-for-exxon-russia-in-trump-cabinet-pick... Dec 7, 2016 - Rachel Maddow reports on the massive ExxonMobil deal with Russian oil that was held up because of U.S. sanctions on Russia for invading ... To Russia, with love: Donald Trump ready to deliver $500 billion check ... www.dailykos.com/.../-To-Russia-with-love-Donald-Trump-ready-to-deliver-500-billi... Jan 27, 2017 - On Putin's desk: A deal signed by Rex Tillerson that will give Russia $500B dollars if sanctions are lifted. That's enough to allow Putin to ... Could Massive Russian Oil Deal with Exxon Explain Why Putin ... https://www.democracynow.org/2016/12/12/could_massive_russian_oil_deal_with Dec 12, 2016 - One of the enormous deals that Vladimir Putin and Rex Tillerson worked on was a $500 billion oil exploration partnership between Exxon and ... Rachel Maddow: Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson as Sec'y of State is $500 ... www.towleroad.com/2017/01/exxon-russia/ Jan 12, 2017 - Rachel Maddow: Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson as Sec'y of State is $500 ... anyone who has oil investment in Russia, to the tune of $500 billion. ... Under Rex Tillerson they made a half trillion dollar deal in Russia to drill the arctic. A Brief Guide to Rex Tillerson's Controversial Foreign Ties - The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/.../tillerson...russia.../512750/ Jan 11, 2017 - For a time, Tillerson headed up ExxonMobil's Russian operations. ... That deal—conducted, at Tillerson's strenuous insistence, to the letter of ... In 2011, the company entered a $500-billion joint venture to drill on the Arctic ... Rex Tillerson's confirmation hearing is today ... - Business Insider www.businessinsider.com/how-exxon-mobil-trump-presidency-benefits-2017-1 Jan 11, 2017 - Tillerson's close relationship with Russia and Putin, however, has led to speculation that ... Exxon's Arctic agreement with Rosneft, reported to be worth $500 billion, to proceed. Exxon, meanwhile, still has its eye on the deal. Exxon's Sanctioned Russian Oil Deal Threatens Rex Tillerson As ... www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2016/12/15/trump-russia-exxon-tillerson/ Dec 15, 2016 - Exxon has a sanction's-banned oil deal with Russian owned Rosneft. ... loss from these joint ventures as of December 31, 2015, was $1 billion. Searches related to tillerson 500 billion deal with russia exxon russia 500 billion exxonmobil russia sanctions exxon rosneft deal rachel maddow exxon russia putin exxon deal trump, putin, and exxonmobil team up to destroy the planet exxonmobil russia arctic does putin own rosneft You're obviously lying about your results... how pathetic. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/01/17 at 15:16:33 Can you show how it is bad for America? Do you understand that Hillary diminished OUR access to uranium AND got millions paid into the Clinton foundation? Now America has to buy more than we did before. How is putting more oil into the market a bad thing? |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by pg on 04/01/17 at 15:28:37 3D232C2D203D263B490 wrote:
How about posting a link that works, no kidding. No only was there no information, the links didn't work. I tried to open the 1st five links and here are the results I got. thinkprogress.org (just general log-on page) - No information regarding Russia Page unavailable, page is being updated or is no longer available Page unavailable, page is being updated or is no longer available Permission denied Page not found (404). That is utterly piss poor! ;D Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by MnSpring on 04/01/17 at 18:16:14 7C6B6D616E7E0C0 wrote:
Gee, you are, Surprised ????? |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by thumperclone on 04/01/17 at 18:35:55 786761667B7C4D7D4D75676B20120 wrote:
AGAIN your facts are bogus the ruskie company owner did donate to the Clinton foundation in 2007 he left his post 3 YEARS BEFORE the deal BEFORE Clinton was sec of tate she had NO,NONE,NOT ANY approval or veto rights over the deal.. THE CRUSADER is not a reliable source of facts except for the white robe and hood crowd |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by MnSpring on 04/01/17 at 19:27:23 312D302835203726292A2B20450 wrote:
OK, so the NYT's, Is, 'FAKE NEWS' ???? https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0 Guess I Didn't know ! "... A number of investors in Uranium One gave donations to the Clinton Foundation during the time the sale was being considered (between 2008 and 2010)..." http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2015/04/24/Did-Putin-Snag-US-Uranium-and-Sell-It-Iran http://www.businessinsider.com/everything-we-know-about-the-hillary-clinton-russia-uranium-scandal-2015-4 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/26/world/europe/26russia.html https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-23/how-putin-s-russia-gained-control-of-a-u-s-uranium-mine |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by pg on 04/02/17 at 03:04:19 13300D2E2C3730395E0 wrote:
Gee, you are, Surprised ????? [/quote] I suspect they have retracted their BS stories. :-X Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by WebsterMark on 04/02/17 at 05:17:45 203F393E23241525152D3F33784A0 wrote:
Correct. He did not recommend. That's his only role. Attorney General indicts. I know that but misspoke. My bad. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by WebsterMark on 04/02/17 at 05:25:36 6771667B63767B60140 wrote:
Lets be clear here. Trump is being tried in the court of public opinion, which consists of a stacked jury. Trump has not had to "apologize and accept responsibility " like Hilary because as of yet, zero evidence has been produced that shows anything of consequence occurred. You people (Jog, I like that phrase when referring to certain people on this forum! I say we make it standard operating procedures) had better be a little careful with this Russian thing. You are accustomed to flipping scripts and basically getting what you want out into the media, but Trump kicked your little tails for a year and a half and got elected so your normal playbook might not apply here. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by T And T Garage on 04/02/17 at 10:21:23 2730363A3525570 wrote:
How about posting a link that works, no kidding. No only was there no information, the links didn't work. I tried to open the 1st five links and here are the results I got. thinkprogress.org (just general log-on page) - No information regarding Russia Page unavailable, page is being updated or is no longer available Page unavailable, page is being updated or is no longer available Permission denied Page not found (404). That is utterly piss poor! ;D Best regards, [/quote] BWAAAHAAHAAHAAAA!!!! You may want to have your kids show you how to use the internet.... I showed you the results of my Google search - they WERE NOT LINKS. You obviously don't know the difference... LOL Too funny!! Well, for your limited ability, I'll be nice and list the complete links below... Think you can follow that?? Here you go (again): http://thinkprogress.org/putin-helped-trump-exxon-oil-deal-sanctions-6f169c4a4cd0 https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/world/europe/rex-tillersons-company-exxon-has-billions-at-stake-over-russia-sanctions.html http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/-500-billion-opportunity-for-exxon-russia-in-trump-cabinet-pick-827731523790 http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/1/27/1625914/-To-Russia-with-love-Donald-Trump-ready-to-deliver-500-billion-check-to-Putin https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/01/tillerson-confirmation-senate-mccain-graham-exxonmobil-russia-putin/512750/ https://www.democracynow.org/2016/12/12/could_massive_russian_oil_deal_with http://www.businessinsider.com/how-exxon-mobil-trump-presidency-benefits-2017-1 https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2016/12/15/trump-russia-exxon-tillerson/#448aa3fd1239 http://money.cnn.com/2016/12/11/investing/rex-tillerson-exxon-russia-putin/ Spoon fed for your convenience... LOL!!! Talk about lazy.... |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by pg on 04/02/17 at 11:53:41 It is just semantics. However, did you read any of the articles you posted? They are regurgitated the same "fake news" over and over again. Russia is not getting $500 billion, it was a joint exploration deal that was signed in 2013. I came across this and it was not one of the "links" you posted. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/31/business/global/exxon-and-rosneft-partner-in-russian-oil-deal.html But while Russian news agencies said Mr. Putin had stated the potential investments by both companies to be as high as $500 billion, Exxon officials said the figures, at least initially, would more likely be in the tens of billions of dollars. All your doing is propagating more "fake news". ::) Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by T And T Garage on 04/03/17 at 06:11:49 3F282E222D3D4F0 wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen.... I present - BACKPEDALING. It's only fake news when the truth hurts you and donny, right? Hey there comrade - even "just" a billion is TOO MUCH. The sanctions imposed because of Crimea was the right thing to do... now just watch as donny tweeter and moneybags tillerson open the floodgates for your lovely russia. It makes me want to puke. But yeah, you go on and keep defending this orange moron who's gonna fleece the US. You deserve the president you got. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by pg on 04/03/17 at 13:49:32 3D232C2D203D263B490 wrote:
You post links that don't work, then the information you post is overstated by hundreds of billions, and you say I'm backpedaling.... ::) The manner in which you rationalize reality is borderline disturbing. ;) Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by T And T Garage on 04/03/17 at 14:08:40 5740464A4555270 wrote:
You post links that don't work, then the information you post is overstated by hundreds of billions, and you say I'm backpedaling.... ::) The manner in which you rationalize reality is borderline disturbing. ;) Best regards, [/quote] Really? So these links don't work?? : http://thinkprogress.org/putin-helped-trump-exxon-oil-deal-sanctions-6f169c4a... https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/world/europe/rex-tillersons-company-exxon-... http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/-500-billion-opportunity-for-exxon-r... http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/1/27/1625914/-To-Russia-with-love-Donald-T... https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/01/tillerson-confirmat... https://www.democracynow.org/2016/12/12/could_massive_russian_oil_deal_with http://www.businessinsider.com/how-exxon-mobil-trump-presidency-benefits-2017-1 https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2016/12/15/trump-russia-exxon-tillerso... http://money.cnn.com/2016/12/11/investing/rex-tillerson-exxon-russia-putin/ Do I need to show you how to click on them??? My first post was a LIST OF RESULTS - NOT LINKS. Nowhere did I say LINKS..... LOL Oh, and as to the amount. Rest assured, it's half a trillion $. (again, just go to the links above). But if those aren't good enough, then try these on for size: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-exxon-rosneft-idUSBRE83H0UE20120418 https://eatprayvote.org/2017/01/15/russia-needs-trump-and-tillerson-in-a-500-billion-dollar-bad-way/ https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/worldnews/2387900/rex-tillerson-secretary-of-state-donald-trump-exxon/ http://www.russia-direct.org/opinion/tillerson-pick-oil-profits-would-trump-geopolitics Your ignorance to the fleecing of America is pathetic.... but not surprising. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/03/17 at 15:04:33 Where you been all your life? Fleecing has been running rampant since at least 1913. I explain how it's done and get called names. |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by pg on 04/03/17 at 18:08:47 140A050409140F12600 wrote:
Rest assured, why because Rachael Maddow said so? How is it a half trillion? Who got fleeced? All that transpired was an exploratory partnership was formed and was subjugated because of the sanctions. Your less than stellar playground insults reveal your true character. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: your prez Post by T And T Garage on 04/03/17 at 20:46:39 4651575B5444360 wrote:
Rest assured, why because Rachael Maddow said so? How is it a half trillion? Who got fleeced? All that transpired was an exploratory partnership was formed and was subjugated because of the sanctions. Your less than stellar playground insults reveal your true character. Best regards,[/quote] LOL - there's no avoiding the truth. It's a lot more than rachael maddow calling tilly out. But yeah, you go ahead and defend donny and his pathetic cabinet full of swamp monsters. I'm sure that's gonna work out great for you... LMAO!!! |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |