SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Democracy......NOT, a KingDon (kingdom)
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1493845093

Message started by raydawg on 05/03/17 at 13:58:13

Title: Democracy......NOT, a KingDon (kingdom)
Post by raydawg on 05/03/17 at 13:58:13

Hello Donnie, you don't OWN the gubbermint, therefor you can't decree, you MUST govern by consensus, even if that means to compromise yourself.

Ok?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/03/trump-stirs-pot-with-talk-blowing-up-senate-rules.html

Title: Re: Democracy......NOT, a KingDon (kingdom)
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 05/03/17 at 14:11:26

It'd be easy to understand why he would think he can do anything. Look at the unilateral decision making we've seen in the last , what? Twenty years?

Title: Re: Democracy......NOT, a KingDon (kingdom)
Post by raydawg on 05/03/17 at 17:37:07

504F494E53546555655D4F43083A0 wrote:

It'd be easy to understand why he would think he can do anything. Look at the unilateral decision making we've seen in the last , what? Twenty years?

I can't argue that.....
Here is my take, the president should be more of an ambassador, and hold the senate and house to work accordingly to iron out a compromise.
The senate and house to battle it out, as elected by their "constituents", read, not party, but if those who they represent.
Judicial should never, ever, be used to legislate or circumvent it.
The SC needs to uphold the constitution, not bend it.
If an amendment is needed decides the populace, then it needs to come up through the legislative branch, ratified, and extended.
However, it can not override another amendments intent.
Intent can be subjective, as much has happened the drafters could not have imagined.
However, most of this new ground would be technological, for the most part, example, they had no idea of advanced weaponry, that has the capacity to inflict great damage to the populace as well as the tyrannical....
I believe the right to bear not be infringed, but limitations of "arms" is a fair argument.

Title: Re: Democracy......NOT, a KingDon (kingdom)
Post by MnSpring on 05/03/17 at 18:17:25

Perhaps, ’tweeting’ is the new form of what, Reagan did.

He would go to the People, (on TV), state his case, then the People, would TELL, their representatives what to do.
(As it Should Be)

Looks like, ’tweeting’, (today), is a ’sounding board’.
For the people, to, TELL, their ELECTED, representatives, what to do.

(If they care, pizza & Re-Runs ya know)

Title: Re: Democracy......NOT, a KingDon (kingdom)
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 05/03/17 at 18:34:41

compromise

Why is compromise so desirable?
How much do you Compromise RIGHT and Not be Wrong?

Title: Re: Democracy......NOT, a KingDon (kingdom)
Post by raydawg on 05/03/17 at 18:46:32

2B343235282F1E2E1E26343873410 wrote:

compromise

Why is compromise so desirable?
How much do you Compromise RIGHT and Not be Wrong?

Ain't no pat answer to that I'm afraid

Title: Re: Democracy......NOT, a KingDon (kingdom)
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 05/03/17 at 18:56:26

y take, the president should be more of an ambassador, and hold the senate and house to work accordingly to iron out a compromise.
The senate and house to battle it out, as elected by their "con

The notion that willingness to compromise is THE badge of reason is not correct.
I've explained several times.
But, for the reluctant to learn.

The three of us have voted to eat your leg for supper.

But, we're willing to compromise.

From the knee down will have to be good enough.

See how reasonable everyone is?
Yep, as long as someone will compromise, they are okay.
Unless what they wanted was completely unacceptable. Then what? Negotiate them down to Half? It's Still a Completely Unacceptable IDEA.
I hope if i ever meet any of you I remember to haul a chess set.
Ohh, checkmate.