SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Here is my take (no Bot read)
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1498063364

Message started by raydawg on 06/21/17 at 09:42:44

Title: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by raydawg on 06/21/17 at 09:42:44

Re: the Georgia race yesterday.....

The left had one player up, spend records from the heart of the movement, California, etc, to be able to spin their own revelation as gospel.
They lost.
Now come mid term, that luxury of money equates to power via exposure, hype, will be greatly diluted, as it will have to be spread out to possible viable races of change, at the cost of leaving held seats under funded.

Maybe the good thing is that it could break the bank on Soros ;D

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/06/21/five_takeaways_from_tuesdays_special_elections_134245.amp.html

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by T And T Garage on 06/21/17 at 09:56:22

My take is that, once again, the dems run a centrist (read establishment) campaign and of course - lose. Not progressive in the least.

The dems and GOPers are on their way out - take note people. No amount of money will get you an establishment win.

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by raydawg on 06/21/17 at 10:02:26

I think most of us here agree with that "swamp draining"
But tell me how you circumvent the media, who control the sheep minds, and pull the strings of the established puppets?

Tweets?

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by T And T Garage on 06/21/17 at 10:39:21

24372F32372131560 wrote:

I think most of us here agree with that "swamp draining"
But tell me how you circumvent the media, who control the sheep minds, and pull the strings of the established puppets?

Tweets?

Yes - and no.

Social media - for better or worse - is going to usurp all traditional media outlets. TV is dying in the news segment. Far more get their news online than anywhere else. This is especially true of young people (obviously).

Whether you like it or not - people like Jon Oliver, Cenk Uygur, crazy alex jones (cringe) and the like are drawing massive viewership. For the most part, it's truth to power (with alex being the exception).

It's not all about party affiliation - If you don't believe me, look at Uygur's reactions to hillary and even the loser from last night's election in GA.

The reason pure digital sources are becoming more and more popular is that they're NOT affiliated with any network conglomerate (msnbc, fox, cnn, etc.)

Like I've said all along - people are better informed now than at anytime in our history. Yes, they can pick and choose, but the truth, however painful, will rise to the top eventually.

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by raydawg on 06/21/17 at 10:59:41

I can't argue against the same argument I have made in the past, how the Internet, etc, will provide a so called , instant recall ability and lies more readily accessible to hang in the liar as they try to spin another....
But how do we keep the powerful from getting control over free bandwidth?

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by T And T Garage on 06/21/17 at 11:17:05

73607865607666010 wrote:

I can't argue against the same argument I have made in the past, how the Internet, etc, will provide a so called , instant recall ability and lies more readily accessible to hang in the liar as they try to spin another....

Yep - it's working with tweety....

But how do we keep the powerful from getting control over free bandwidth?

By keeping net neutrality. You can bet that if a giant corporation is in favor of killing NN, then it's only gonna benefit them - not the consumer.

tweety has chosen the worst possible person to head the FCC. It's funny, I hear all the talk from GOPers about free enterprise and small businesses - just wait until the GOPers do their damage on the internet. If NN falls, you're gonna see a whole new web-verse & it won't be pretty - no more internet startups...

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by raydawg on 06/21/17 at 12:26:10

I am so ignorant on the matter....
I know others have broached the subject, but I never could wrap any understanding around it.
Maybe a new thread, another try, at how this piece fits the puzzle?

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by verslagen1 on 06/21/17 at 13:31:14

With so much fake news, lies, and pre-conceived opinions out there, I think your deluding yourself on the truth will rise to the surface.

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 06/21/17 at 14:18:57

It's just hard to see how someone can See ,,,Establishment,,
And Not See that the Historical Figures who WARNED us of a power, unelected by and unanswerable to the People were right.
The Trump Hating bubs ARE exposed as Not responsive to the People, so Who do they work for?

Can anyone solve that riddle?

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by pg on 06/21/17 at 14:28:09

627C73727F627964160 wrote:

tweety has chosen the worst possible person to head the FCC. It's funny,

Ahh, Barry appointed him Commissioner of the FCC in 2012 and he was unanimously confirmed.

Best regards,

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by T And T Garage on 06/21/17 at 15:03:27

4750565A5545370 wrote:

[quote author=627C73727F627964160 link=1498063364/0#5 date=1498069025]

tweety has chosen the worst possible person to head the FCC. It's funny,

Ahh, Barry appointed him Commissioner of the FCC in 2012 and he was unanimously confirmed.

Best regards,[/quote]

Yep - to fill a republican vacancy.. hardly a leadership position....

President Obama nominated former Federal Communications Commission deputy general counsel Ajit Pai and Senate Commerce Committee senior communications counsel Jessica Rosenworcel on Monday to fill the two vacancies on the Commission left by Republican Meredith Attwell Baker's departure to join Comcast earlier this year and Democratic Commissioner Michael Copps' eventual retirement.

Typical GOP - only knows half the story and pretends that it's gospel... lol

Why not throw in "You didn't build it..."
SMH

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by T And T Garage on 06/21/17 at 15:05:35

46595F5845427343734B59551E2C0 wrote:

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by raydawg on 06/21/17 at 15:06:37

Huh......!???

Did Obama appoint the person to who you refer?
A yes, or no, please.

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by T And T Garage on 06/21/17 at 15:17:19

6A79617C796F7F180 wrote:

Huh......!???

Did Obama appoint the person to who you refer?
A yes, or no, please.

Yes - Appointed to the commission as a replacement - Ajit had worked at the FCC before then. (read the quote I pasted)

Tweety put him in the chairman's seat, not Obama.

Let's not overlook the context folks...

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by raydawg on 06/21/17 at 16:04:23

ok, he replaced a like for like, so to speak, not the best one he could of?

Then tweets put him in the #1 position, is that right?

Why is this person different ?

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by pg on 06/21/17 at 16:22:08

435D52535E435845370 wrote:

[quote author=4750565A5545370 link=1498063364/0#9 date=1498080489][quote author=627C73727F627964160 link=1498063364/0#5 date=1498069025]

tweety has chosen the worst possible person to head the FCC. It's funny,

Title: Re: Here is my take (no Bot read)
Post by T And T Garage on 06/22/17 at 08:10:45

6D7A7C707F6F1D0 wrote:

[quote author=435D52535E435845370 link=1498063364/0#10 date=1498082607][quote author=4750565A5545370 link=1498063364/0#9 date=1498080489][quote author=627C73727F627964160 link=1498063364/0#5 date=1498069025]

tweety has chosen the worst possible person to head the FCC. It's funny,