SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Is bigger always better?
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1498742330

Message started by raydawg on 06/29/17 at 06:18:50

Title: Is bigger always better?
Post by raydawg on 06/29/17 at 06:18:50

I haven't seen any savage chicks visit this board, but just in case...,.
We'll put you down as a yes ;D

All fun aside now.
Found this a good read.
I find Jeff Bezo sort of playing every angle as he talks a good game, etc, yet the man is what might be considered filthy rich and his wealth has the capacity to disrupt the lives of others, is that fair?

I don't know, I just don't like thinking our gubbermint is the answer for everything.

Here is the article:

http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2017/06/29/amazons-whole-foods-buyout-what-farmers-are-saying.amp.html

Title: Re: Is bigger always better?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 06/29/17 at 09:56:55

Is it FAIR?
What would you suggest? How would it be Made Fair, IF in fact it's not Fair that he has enough to affect the lives of others?
If you want to see what a malevolent POS looks like, check out George Soros.
Will Bozos make a mess of Whole Foods? Probably..

Title: Re: Is bigger always better?
Post by raydawg on 06/29/17 at 10:07:57

293630372A2D1C2C1C24363A71430 wrote:

Is Bezo a liberal, progressive, or?
Doesn't he contribute funds to democrats, who make wealth an issue?
Didn't I see a member here calling you out Jog on Obamacare, or opposition to it in trying to find a better program....
Where this guy brought up the cause that the poor will be effected, but according to him, you don't care about the poor, and he even suggested because of such an attitude, he thought you would end up poor too....

Or am I mistaken?

Title: Re: Is bigger always better?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 06/29/17 at 10:20:53

If someone wants to believe I am without empathy and charity, that is their choice.
I saw Bamicare as an anchor, painted with
Flotation Device
handed to drowning people.
I was right.
Throwing matches at a fire, pretending that since it has never been tried as a means to put a fire out it shouldn't be opposed is as stupid as the reason for supporting Bamicare.
I heard
But This has never been tried!
There are REASONS why it had never been tried.
It was stupid to believe it could WORK!
And it didn't.
And I was right.
Again.
You can't know what is in it until you pass it?

Who would sign THAT contract?