|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Reject the reject /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1499289604 Message started by T And T Garage on 07/05/17 at 14:20:04 |
|
Title: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/05/17 at 14:20:04 Hmmm... I wonder why? http://www.yahoo.com/news/almost-every-state-declined-white-houses-request-voter-data-170656453.html |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by pg on 07/05/17 at 14:52:16 That is plain to see, they don't want to be humiliated with a democratic institution that has been compromised. 20% of Rhode Island voters were fraudulent. http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/28/rhode-island-discover-150000-voters-erroneously-on-rolls/ Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/05/17 at 14:55:46 3B2C2A2629394B0 wrote:
"Gorbea said she would not describe it as “fraud.” She added, “It’s really just inaccuracies.”" LOL - just admit it pg - there simply is NO fraud.... whaa whaaaaa Again, nice try....Next....... |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by pg on 07/05/17 at 14:57:32 You just lost that argument, move on.... Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/05/17 at 15:01:44 253234383727550 wrote:
Gee - where's my quote from? The very article you posted. Yeah, nice try. I wonder though, do you know the difference between voter rolls and actual votes?? (silly question, of course you don't) |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by pg on 07/05/17 at 15:05:06 6E707F7E736E75681A0 wrote:
Gee - where's my quote from? The very article you posted. Yeah, nice try. I wonder though, do you know the difference between voter rolls and actual votes?? (silly question, of course you don't)[/quote] We know it is getting under your skin when you starting slinging insults. You have no other card to play. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/05/17 at 15:11:42 5344424E4151230 wrote:
Gee - where's my quote from? The very article you posted. Yeah, nice try. I wonder though, do you know the difference between voter rolls and actual votes?? (silly question, of course you don't)[/quote] We know it is getting under your skin when you starting slinging insults. You have no other card to play. Best regards, [/quote] LOL - well, the likes of you make it so easy..... But truth be told, the only thing that gets "under my skin" is ignorance. You seem to display that in abundance. The RI story you shared is NOT about voter fraud. In case you didn't know - there are thousands of people on the voter rolls that shouldn't be because of death, moving, etc. There is ZERO correlation with those erroneous entries and votes. (hey, even tweety's family is registered in more than one state!!) So, get off it - there is NO voter fraud. It's a made up problem by this president's minions - nothing more. I know, facts are hard to swallow by the likes of you when your team is wrong... but oh well - that's the way it goes. Life ain't fair. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by pg on 07/05/17 at 15:44:13 2C323D3C312C372A580 wrote:
150K erroneous votes and Clinton won 54.4% of the state. That is precisely why Trump is requesting the voter data. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/05/17 at 15:46:43 Eat your crow ,, CNN Democrat Van Jones Admits Russia Collusion Story Is BULLSHIT |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/06/17 at 07:29:54 5E494F434C5C2E0 wrote:
150K erroneous votes and Clinton won 54.4% of the state. That is precisely why Trump is requesting the voter data. Best regards, [/quote] Wow.... OK, one more time.... Rolls do NOT equal VOTES - any of this sinking in?????? SMH |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/06/17 at 07:34:58 617E787F62655464546C7E72390B0 wrote:
No, I won't - let's see tweety's taxes, hmmm? Further, BFD if Van Jones says anything.... suddenly you're a fan? LOL - typical One more thing - this is a thread about our stupid president's request for voter registration info - NOT his russian connections. Go ahead and comment on that, but don't grab the thread to push something entirely different. (Check out the tone with jog - seems he's getting a little angry... so sensitive, isn't he?) |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 07:35:51 But dead people and people registered in multiple places and non citizens need to be removed FROM the roll. AAAND CNN admitted that the Trump/Russia thing was a load of BULLSHIT, sold to people who Need a reason to hate, and did it for Ratings, and WITHOUT EVIDENCE. Gee, nobody saw that coming.. Rubes, |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/06/17 at 07:39:10 66797F7865625363536B79753E0C0 wrote:
LOL - so suddenly CNN and Van Jones are NOT fake news? I had no idea you were such a big fan! Gee - just like the jobs numbers are NOW correct, but last year they weren't. BWAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAAA Hey there jog - where are tweety's taxes???? But honestly, try to stay on topic. Everyone's getting a little sick of the "jog show" |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 07:59:27 I'm staying on this. Jones was CAUGHT admitting to the lies. It was not SUPPOSED to be a story. He got Busted. You're paid to troll aren't you.. This place wouldn't exist without me. Don't like the show? Walk away ORR! Here's a novel idea.. Get Honest. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/06/17 at 08:08:32 687771766B6C5D6D5D65777B30020 wrote:
OK, I'll be honest - you're ranting and raving like a lunatic. It's obvious that you are grasping at straws. You are suddenly convinced that there is no investigation because Van Jones said something... how does that work? How does one go from calling it fake news to real news so fast?? tweety called CNN fake news, didn't he? So who's lying? Who's selling out because they so desperately want something to be true? Look at my history jog - NOWHERE will you see me say that tweety is guilty of collusion. I hope for it, yes - because he's an embarrassment to this country. But I never said there was evidence of it - only this... "wait and see"... So there's my position. Now go ahead and keep screaming - you look like a fool doing it and do more damage to your "stellar" reputation than good. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 08:29:08 Are you actually unable to see that Jones was BUSTED, he didn't KNOW he was being recorded.. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/06/17 at 08:30:41 66797F7865625363536B79753E0C0 wrote:
Is the investigation still going on or isn't it? Simple question - simple answer. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 08:41:09 Why do YOU get to corner ME? How many people are no longer working at CNN? Three, right? Why? Why did they leave? What is CNN saying? Are they saying Jones DIDN'T admit it? You're willing to pretend being busted is the same as making a broadcast. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/06/17 at 08:49:43 425D5B5C41467747774F5D511A280 wrote:
I'm saying - as I have all along - that the investigation is still ongoing. Van Jones is a CNN anchor - is he part of the FBI? Nope. Like I keep on saying... I guess we'll see, won't we? |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 09:26:57 Their reporting lacked facts. Sweet! How lefties describe LIES!!! |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/06/17 at 10:14:02 7A656364797E4F7F4F77656922100 wrote:
Yep - they lied. So.... your point was?.... |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/06/17 at 16:52:20 They lied Lefties ate it up And the other stuff I've been saying. You demand it be spelled out and pretend it isn't when it is. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by pg on 07/06/17 at 18:40:38 504E41404D504B56240 wrote:
Because it was in no uncertain terms fraudulent. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/07/17 at 07:43:14 514E484F52556454645C4E42093B0 wrote:
Where? When? If you're going to accuse me of something, you might wanna have a little proof.... |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/07/17 at 07:43:48 1205030F0010620 wrote:
Because it was in no uncertain terms fraudulent. Best regards, [/quote] Yep - that's what I stated....duh. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/07/17 at 10:29:59 Wow, |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by pg on 07/07/17 at 18:50:44 293738393429322F5D0 wrote:
Because it was in no uncertain terms fraudulent. Best regards, [/quote] Yep - that's what I stated....duh. [/quote] So you profess CNN is a fraudulent media outlet with no integrity whatsoever........ Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 08:34:01 3225232F2030420 wrote:
Because it was in no uncertain terms fraudulent. Best regards, [/quote] Yep - that's what I stated....duh. [/quote] So you profess CNN is a fraudulent media outlet with no integrity whatsoever........ Best regards,[/quote] No - nor do I cite them as gospel. For some reason, jog thinks they are now legit for having an open mic on Van Jones... oh well... to each their own. Again, keep it real - CNN, fox, MSNBC are ALL corporate entities. They will skew to their base. Impartiality is dead in cable news. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 09:58:10 em as gospel. For some reason, jog thinks they are now legit for having an open mic on Van Jones... oh well... to each their own. How is it you're unable to see that a statement caught that admits the way they have been doing things is bullshit is so twisted in your mind? FFS, you catch a republican whispering about how their Big Deal is BULLSHIT, you'd be on that. He ADMITS TO LYING. That's not me saying CNN is now the Fountain of Truth. That's me showing you he admitted to lying. And YOU went with Well, MAYBE he's Lying about LYING.. FFS.. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 10:08:47 36292F2835320333033B29256E5C0 wrote:
Yeah, like I said (about 20 times now) - CNN doesn't work for the FBI or any part of the government. They want ratings. Same as fox, msnbc, etc. The fact is, there's STILL an investigation going on.... what part of that is not true???? |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 12:35:57 If anyone remembers where he said that, I'd appreciate it. He ADMITS TO LYING. That's not me saying CNN is now the Fountain of Truth. That's me showing you he admitted to lying. And YOU went with I did? When? Where? If you're going to accuse me - bring the facts, 'buddy Ohhh, you went there.. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 12:45:30 706F696E73744575457D6F63281A0 wrote:
I guess I misunderstood your post - my bad. However, I DID acknowledge what was said on the "open mic". I also acknowledge that the likes of CNN are dubious. The producers do indeed strive for ratings more often than the truth. However, CNN has been around for decades. They have had some stellar reporting. They have, until very recently, been a trustworthy source of information. Lastly, in my postings on here, I don't ever recall basing an entire thread on a CNN story. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 12:53:05 However, I DID acknowledge what was said on the "open mic And pretended that my pointing it out was somehow My Changing Attitude towards CNN, that SUDDENLY I see CNN as some paragon of Truth. BULLSHIT |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 13:00:05 746B6D6A7770417141796B672C1E0 wrote:
LOL - well, take the source for what it is. I personally don't trust anything that infowars posts. To see you talk about CNN, anyone would think you'd feel the same way about them. Let it go now jog - I've said you were right. That in this particular case, CNN got caught with their pants down. But don't forget - there's still an investigation going on. Our president is still being scrutinized - with good reason. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 13:25:00 nd pretended that my pointing it out was somehow My Changing Attitude towards CNN, that SUDDENLY I see CNN as some paragon of Truth. BULLSHIT No, you tried to pretend that I was suddenly a believer in CNN, because he was BUSTED on a hidden camera. You tried to take the wind out of it by pretending he, ON HIDDEN CAMERA, lied about lying. You engaged in every kind of evasion and obfuscation. That's WHY I decided you're insincere and a troll. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 13:32:18 5B444245585F6E5E6E56444803310 wrote:
You're calling me names - shame on you. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 14:27:40 273936373A273C21530 wrote:
You're calling me names - shame on you. [/quote] Identifying behavior accurately isn't name calling. Your behavior is exactly what a troll does. Odd how much you changed after I made the point. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 14:33:17 223D3B3C21261727172F3D317A480 wrote:
Still name calling... seriously, shame on you. You're calling me names - shame on you. [/quote] Identifying behavior accurately isn't name calling. Your behavior is exactly what a troll does. Odd how much you changed after I made the point.[/quote] But I did change, didn't I? I conceded to CNN lying on this one issue. I feel that I am owed an apology for you calling me names. It's only fair, isn't it? Gee whiz - where are the moderators, huh? lol |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 14:39:32 Hey - you know what I forgot? This is a thread that I STARTED!! jog - YOU are actually out of line on this one!! My original post was the states rejecting the president's request for voter rolls. Then you come in with CNN lying... How about that?? I think the next time you start a thread, I'll post complete non sequitur stuff on it!! Fair is fair - right?? LMAO!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 18:38:55 283639383528332E5C0 wrote:
LOL - so suddenly CNN and Van Jones are NOT fake news? I had no idea you were such a big fan! Gee - just like the jobs numbers are NOW correct, but last year they weren't. BWAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAAA Hey there jog - where are tweety's taxes???? But honestly, try to stay on topic. Everyone's getting a little sick of the "jog show" [/quote] Remember what you did? What RULE would stop that? |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/11/17 at 06:25:48 6B747275686F5E6E5E66747833010 wrote:
LOL - so suddenly CNN and Van Jones are NOT fake news? I had no idea you were such a big fan! Gee - just like the jobs numbers are NOW correct, but last year they weren't. BWAAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAHAAAAA Hey there jog - where are tweety's taxes???? But honestly, try to stay on topic. Everyone's getting a little sick of the "jog show" [/quote] Remember what you did? What RULE would stop that?[/quote] Yep, I can remember - it's right there.... But also remember that this was my thread so..... yeah. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/17 at 09:22:43 I couldn't get anyone to answer my charges. I stood in the way of every thread. You shouldn't have been so unwilling to be honest. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/11/17 at 09:34:46 6F7076716C6B5A6A5A62707C37050 wrote:
You shouldn't tell people what to do. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/17 at 09:41:58 BULLSHIT It was a real event and none of the lefties would admit the obvious. Yeah, I'm gonna get it nailed down. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/11/17 at 09:55:29 352A2C2B3631003000382A266D5F0 wrote:
Ok jog... it's been determined that CNN producers kept airing the "russia" thing, even though they thought it was nothing. You've nailed it down So what now? Hmm? Is the investigation still going on? What does CNN have to do with it? Hmm? |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/17 at 09:58:17 I did what needed doing. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/11/17 at 10:23:53 7D6264637E7948784870626E25170 wrote:
OK... so what now? |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/17 at 11:34:57 That's up to you. You've seen I don't let go. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/11/17 at 11:54:39 7E6167607D7A4B7B4B73616D26140 wrote:
OK - if it's up to me... then answer this: Is the investigation into our president's campaign possibly colluding with russia still going on? If so, why does it continue? |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/17 at 13:07:05 why does it continue If I answer that AGAIN Wil you stop Pretending I haven't |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/11/17 at 13:39:04 3E2127203D3A0B3B0B33212D66540 wrote:
I don't care either way. If you want to answer, then answer. No skin off my taint... |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/17 at 13:42:21 I've addressed that no fewer than three times. You can remember or find it. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/11/17 at 14:12:34 392620273A3D0C3C0C34262A61530 wrote:
LOL - actually, no you haven't. Not in this thread. I just went back and looked. To make it easy on you - answer here, if you dare/like: Is the investigation into our president's campaign possibly colluding with russia still going on? If so, why does it continue? |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/11/17 at 17:13:41 Phhht. Done, you can go look. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/12/17 at 09:46:31 495650574A4D7C4C7C44565A11230 wrote:
LMAO - yep, another typical response. You said you answered it, but you didn't. Thanks. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/12/17 at 12:05:05 You're wrong , still. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/12/17 at 12:26:29 6A757374696E5F6F5F67757932000 wrote:
LMAO - and you moan and complain about people not "owning" it?.... You're pretty typical of every con I know. Full of bluster - until they have to answer a question they don't like the answer to. Thanks for being so typical! LOL |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/12/17 at 12:41:51 I explained it several times. You admitted Toying with me, I'm not gonna do it again. Read, In fact, some of it is repeated today. |
|
Title: Re: Reject the reject Post by T And T Garage on 07/12/17 at 12:48:00 706F696E73744575457D6F63281A0 wrote:
Whaaaa..... oh well, like I said - typical. Thanks for playing. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |