SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Now, WHO is This?
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1499615309

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 07/09/17 at 08:48:29

Title: Now, WHO is This?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/09/17 at 08:48:29

Sounds so much like someone here..

https://www.infowars.com/harry-potter-doppleganger-attacks-infowars/

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 08:27:48

5E4147405D5A6B5B6B53414D06340 wrote:

Sounds so much like someone here..

https://www.infowars.com/harry-potter-doppleganger-attacks-infowars/

LOL - infowars... too funny!!

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 09:44:02

The Reporting Source means

That idiot didn't just get hizass handed to him.

BULLSHIT.

She made a zombie out of him.

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 09:49:27

657A7C7B6661506050687A763D0F0 wrote:

The Reporting Source means

That idiot didn't just get hizass handed to him.

BULLSHIT.

She made a zombie out of him.

LOL - infowars... too funny!!

All your eggs in this one basket?... be careful! Did you see jr's confession this weekend? Have we seen our president's taxes yet?

Yep - CNN is out for ratings... infowars is a joke. Even crazy alex said it's all theater.

Too funny!

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 09:52:09

Do we need a rule that states a Nonsequiter isn't a response?

That guy Lost on every point.

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 09:56:40

514E484F52556454645C4E42093B0 wrote:

Do we need a rule that states a Nonsequiter isn't a response?

That guy Lost on every point.

One guy - like two points... so? That's supposed to legitimize our current joke of an administration??

Of course CNN does these stories for ratings!! Duh!! Fake news seems to be in the eye of the beholder.... huh?

It's infowars... the same "network" that crazy alex said that Obama and hillary are demons that smelled like sulfur!!!

Nope - not legit. For all we know that guy could have worked for infowars...

You wanna talk about a fake news "network" - infowars is at the top of the list.

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 10:01:22

Nope - not legit. For all we know that guy could have worked for infowars..

Wow, as IF that guy could stand in the same room with Alex Jones. He'd crap his pants.

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 10:02:46

736C6A6D70774676467E6C602B190 wrote:

Nope - not legit. For all we know that guy could have worked for infowars..

Wow, as IF that guy could stand in the same room with Alex Jones. He'd crap his pants.

Probably - but to think that anything coming from the infowars site has any credibility is laughable.

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 10:19:03

And yet, the observed reality aligns more with what Used to Be the Norm from them than any mainstream source.
I don't listen to him anymore. The people he interviewed stopped being retired people who saw the events unfolding.

The problems to be solved, well, one side sees a problem where the other sees not only No Problem, but it's GOOD!

Until these Great Champions of Justice understand private property rights there can be no Social Justice.
The notion that it's okay to force a baker to contract with someone to do something that would celebrate what is morally reprehensible to him is the ultimate injustice.
And if you called it Good , then you're trying to build what can't exist.
It's not possible to have a society of general acceptance while the party demanding it engages in injustice to create it.

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 10:33:02

3C2325223F3809390931232F64560 wrote:

And yet, the observed reality aligns more with what Used to Be the Norm from them than any mainstream source.

BWAAAHAAHAAHAAAHAAHAAHAAAAA!!!! And you call CNN fake news????? You're hilarious!!!!

I don't listen to him anymore. The people he interviewed stopped being retired people who saw the events unfolding.

Stop! Stop! My side hurts from laughing!!!

The problems to be solved, well, one side sees a problem where the other sees not only No Problem, but it's GOOD!

Until these Great Champions of Justice understand private property rights there can be no Social Justice.
The notion that it's okay to force a baker to contract with someone to do something that would celebrate what is morally reprehensible to him is the ultimate injustice.
And if you called it Good , then you're trying to build what can't exist.
It's not possible to have a society of general acceptance while the party demanding it engages in injustice to create it.

alex jones is nothing but a performer - he said it himself. infowars is a joke - they are not credible. There is no defending them.

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/10/17 at 10:40:35

I know how desperately you need that to be true.
They WERE more relevant, but that that dude got pwned is obvious. His Talking Points ARE what is part of you lefties source of Truth.
And she Destroyed Everything he said.

How much of what HE said do You agree with?
She destroyed every bit of it.

Even IF he Owns the Alex Jones show,
That doesn't Change the Words, their meaning
Or how easily she made every idea he Put out,
A piece of wreckage, the kind of wreckage created by reason crushing ideology.

ntil these Great Champions of Justice understand private property rights there can be no Social Justice.
The notion that it's okay to force a baker to contract with someone to do something that would celebrate what is morally reprehensible to him is the ultimate injustice.
And if you called it Good , then you're trying to build what can't exist.
It's not possible to have a society of general acceptance while the party demanding it engages in injustice to create it.

Title: Re: Now, WHO is This?
Post by T And T Garage on 07/10/17 at 11:01:52

7A656364797E4F7F4F77656922100 wrote:

I know how desperately you need that to be true.

To be clear - I'm not the one saying that alex is a performer - HE IS. I don't "desperately need" anything. I'm merely pointing out facts.

They WERE more relevant, but that that dude got pwned is obvious.

But you forget - it's infowars. That guy could have been a plant. And so what if he's not? Do you equate everyone who's not a con as that guy?? Seriously? How little you think of others....

His Talking Points ARE what is part of you lefties source of Truth.
And she Destroyed Everything he said.

Again, how many talking points, hmm? You honestly think that he's the standard bearer of everyone on the left?? Don't make me cite people like david duke or alex jones, ok?

How much of what HE said do You agree with?

His first part, about the alt right co-opting the term fake news is spot on. Actually, most of what he says I agree with. His only mistake was not to continue the conversation. And the "fake news" about crazy alex's supplements was the wrong choice. I'd have gone with the hillary and Obama "demon smell" - or the Sandy Hook "fake".

She destroyed every bit of it.

Your perception of "destroyed" is pretty loose...

Even IF he Owns the Alex Jones show,
That doesn't Change the Words, their meaning
Or how easily she made every idea he Put out,
A piece of wreckage, the kind of wreckage created by reason crushing ideology.

How many ideas jog? 2? Tell me how she destroyed the fact that several conservative "news" outlets did in fact post fake news during the 2016 campaign (I can cite several if you'd like).

You're truly grasping at straws and pinning your hopes of defending tweety on infowars' credibility... a house built on sand.

ntil these Great Champions of Justice understand private property rights there can be no Social Justice.
The notion that it's okay to force a baker to contract with someone to do something that would celebrate what is morally reprehensible to him is the ultimate injustice.
And if you called it Good , then you're trying to build what can't exist.
It's not possible to have a society of general acceptance while the party demanding it engages in injustice to create it.