|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Meaningful discourse /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1499891315 Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 07/12/17 at 13:28:35 |
|
Title: Meaningful discourse Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/12/17 at 13:28:35 Is no longer possible. Some people are determined to keep it at sandbox childish. It took me HOURS to get past the bullshit. It's not okay to do that. Nothing even remotely approaching logical rational discourse is possible here any more. And I say TT OWNS that. The Table is nothing anymore, because of the pretense that some Clearly obvious point isn't true. If the objective is to Stop people from actually looking at things and studying the events that preceded them, then Tt is your guy. I've been reduced to pettiness, out of exasperation.. Tt would have been shown the door in any civilised meeting of political minds. Stop the bullshit. The choice to not read and study events that would lend credence to the Zero Hedge article is yours. The names connected, the logic held up. And, I've SEEN your ability to deny the obvious truth. You have no credibility. You fought tooth and nail defending the indefensible Aaand You followed it All up with Eloquent, accurate, reasoned arguments against the minimum wage hike. So, you Prove you're intellectually capable of understanding. After the big game on me. It's not just me. You twist and divert everything that would be supportive of the conservative ideology. It's no longer a place to consider things. If I wanted a soap opera and mud wrestling I could go to Wal-Mart. |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by T And T Garage on 07/12/17 at 14:23:32 756A6C6B7671407040786A662D1F0 wrote:
Well, most of the cons I know love Wally World... Jog - in past posts you've called me things like "butthurt" and "snowflake". Those names allude to being overly sensitive, right? How is it that you fail to see that you are the one acting out in this manner? That our president is acting out in this manner. That the conservatives are acting out in this manner (war on Christmas anyone?). You've seem to have been hurt by my toying with you on CNN. Sorry you couldn't handle that. Perhaps I should have known better. But more to the point, why don't you see your own hypocrisy? Why can't you see that in practically every other instance, you relegate CNN to fake news? That was the point I was making. And when you look further, I conceded to your accusation - even though it was NOT relevant to the thread that I started. Perhaps, you should own that. Tell me, in any other "civilised meeting of political minds" - would you have been credible hijacking a thread? Think about that. That's the thing about having "high morals" - you yourself have to live up to them. |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by Serowbot on 07/12/17 at 14:29:49 Personal attacks are for snowflake losers... Tweeter n' Chief is their king... |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by MnSpring on 07/12/17 at 15:43:27 6E786F726A7F72691D0 wrote:
In , JUST this ONE Post, you just said, “…Personal attacks are for snowflake losers…” So, believing the, (new meaning), of the term, ’Snowflake/s’, is: “A Ultra-Liberal, Crier, etc” So than only a, “A Ultra-Liberal, Crier, etc”, makes, ‘personal attacks’. OK, so your opinion, of someone, calling your Pet’s, comments, “Bull$hit”. Means, in your POV, that person, is a, ’Snowflake’. OK again, got it, it is your POV. But then to add, the Last Statement, where, YOU say: “Tweeter n’ Chief…” I view that as, YOU, calling, YOURSELF, a, ’Snowflake’. Lets see: http://nypost.com/2016/06/25/clinton-white-house-was-a-den-of-cocaine-and-mistresses-ex-secret-service-officer/ https://www.thomhartmann.com/users/telliottmbamsc/blog/2015/10/new-york-post-%E2%80%9Csecret-service-agents-hillary-nightmare-work-with%E2%80%9D http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2713591/Hillary-told-one-agent-f-suit-looked-cheap-Secret-Service-agents-say-guarding-former-First-Lady-wasthe-worst-form-punishment-author-reveals-explosive-new-book.html http://nypost.com/2016/10/26/ex-secret-service-officer-who-wrote-clinton-tell-all-plans-to-file-defamation-suit/ (On and, On and, On and, On and, On and, On, ….) But, ’Tweeting’, is, ‘Horrible’. |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by pg on 07/12/17 at 16:42:39 You mean you put credence into "tyler durden"? Zero Hedge is compilation of conservative blog articles. What is wrong with that? Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by MnSpring on 07/12/17 at 16:59:36 Zero Hedge is compilation of conservative blog articles. What is wrong with that? Oh NO, that is WRONG !!!!!!!!!! Only a, ‘compilation of, Ultra-Liberal, blog articles’. Is, ‘Correct’. Have you not been, TOLD, so ???? |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/12/17 at 17:39:29 After I made the point several times and nobody would own the CNN thing I blocked every thread. Not only did you FINALLY admit what was obvious, you pretended I was SUPPORTING CNN ! How insincere is that? You tried to weasel out with Maybe he was lying about LYING. As If that's ok? |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by T And T Garage on 07/12/17 at 18:44:00 6B7C7A7679691B0 wrote:
LOL - if they're such "pillars" - then why the pseudonym?... Nice try.... |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by T And T Garage on 07/12/17 at 18:50:51 223D3B3C21261727172F3D317A480 wrote:
What difference does it make jog? The fact that they lied has ZERO bearing on the investigation. You can't handle that, can you? |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/12/17 at 19:20:59 I pointed out that CNN lied. Nothing about the investigation. Completely separate things. And, it took Forever to get an admission. You've seem to have been hurt by my toying with you on CNN. Sorry you couldn't handle that. Perhaps I should have known better. Bullshit |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by pg on 07/12/17 at 19:27:57 2F313E3F322F34295B0 wrote:
That's not exactly true, they are building and fostering public support for their witch hunt. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by pg on 07/12/17 at 19:32:41 6A747B7A776A716C1E0 wrote:
The pseudonym is indicative or suggestive of the feud for conservative values. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by T And T Garage on 07/13/17 at 09:06:54 3C2B2D212E3E4C0 wrote:
That's not exactly true, they are building and fostering public support for their witch hunt. Best regards,[/quote] No, they're not... if that were the case, fox news should have been shut down years ago. Nice try. |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by T And T Garage on 07/13/17 at 09:07:38 6B7C7A7679691B0 wrote:
The pseudonym is indicative or suggestive of the feud for conservative values. Best regards,[/quote] LOL - yeah... right..... C'mon - that's weak-sauce, even for you. |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by T And T Garage on 07/13/17 at 09:10:21 233C3A3D20271626162E3C307B490 wrote:
Yeah, great comeback with the swearing... shows how intelligent you are. |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by MShipley on 07/13/17 at 10:39:54 There are 4 kinds of people in this world: The ignorant The fool The wise The arrogant The ignorant is not really bad, they just Don't know, for instance when a 15 year old girl has some guy come along and tells her he Loves her, she of course believes it. The fool knows what is right or wrong but simply chooses to to do what is wrong no matter what the consequences are. this kind does not seek or want any kind of counsel to help him learn and improve. The wise man is exactly that, they are the person that seeks advise and opinions of others so that they can make a logical, educated and wise decision on what ever they are considering. The arrogant has no opinions or ideas. What they do know is that everything someone else knows or believes is wrong. No matter what you ever say or do they will always tell you why you are wrong. Now you can have conversation with the ignorant because they are willing to learn, even the fool can be fun and sooner or later will wise up if they live that long. The wise are always a pleasure to have conversation with but the Arrogant, well you simply do not waste your time with them. |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by T And T Garage on 07/13/17 at 11:03:56 445A616079656C70090 wrote:
Well stated. |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by pg on 07/13/17 at 18:14:46 736D62636E736875070 wrote:
That's not exactly true, they are building and fostering public support for their witch hunt. Best regards,[/quote] No, they're not... Nice try. [/quote] Actually I was a head of the curve on this one. http://www.wnd.com/2017/07/rush-limbaugh-media-leading-coup-against-trump/ Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by pg on 07/13/17 at 18:16:40 5E404F4E435E45582A0 wrote:
The pseudonym is indicative or suggestive of the feud for conservative values. Best regards,[/quote] LOL - yeah... right..... C'mon - that's weak-sauce, even for you. [/quote] No No, you have to admit there is a signficant amount of merit to that statement. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by T And T Garage on 07/14/17 at 05:48:53 6D7A7C707F6F1D0 wrote:
The pseudonym is indicative or suggestive of the feud for conservative values. Best regards,[/quote] LOL - yeah... right..... C'mon - that's weak-sauce, even for you. [/quote] No No, you have to admit there is a signficant amount of merit to that statement. Best regards,[/quote] No, because you seem to think that jr was playing some kind of three dimensional chess... sorry - he just isn't that smart. The fact is - he was looking for dirt. He hoped it would be more, but his intent was illegal. There may have been a myriad of reasons as to why - but rest assured, jr was just the moron on the beach with a metal detector, clueless of what was going on around him... |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by pg on 07/14/17 at 07:52:05 495758595449524F3D0 wrote:
The pseudonym is indicative or suggestive of the feud for conservative values. Best regards,[/quote] LOL - yeah... right..... C'mon - that's weak-sauce, even for you. [/quote] No No, you have to admit there is a signficant amount of merit to that statement. Best regards,[/quote] No, because you seem to think that jr was playing some kind of three dimensional chess... sorry - he just isn't that smart. The fact is - he was looking for dirt. He hoped it would be more, but his intent was illegal. There may have been a myriad of reasons as to why - but rest assured, jr was just the moron on the beach with a metal detector, clueless of what was going on around him... [/quote] You must have been up late watching the TYT. The topic of this post was Tyler Durden. ;) Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Meaningful discourse Post by T And T Garage on 07/14/17 at 07:56:24 647375797666140 wrote:
The pseudonym is indicative or suggestive of the feud for conservative values. Best regards,[/quote] LOL - yeah... right..... C'mon - that's weak-sauce, even for you. [/quote] No No, you have to admit there is a signficant amount of merit to that statement. Best regards,[/quote] No, because you seem to think that jr was playing some kind of three dimensional chess... sorry - he just isn't that smart. The fact is - he was looking for dirt. He hoped it would be more, but his intent was illegal. There may have been a myriad of reasons as to why - but rest assured, jr was just the moron on the beach with a metal detector, clueless of what was going on around him... [/quote] You must have been up late watching the TYT. The topic of this post was Tyler Durden. ;) Best regards,[/quote] Understood - but it relates to the russia meeting, no? I didn't say that what brought this all on is more complex than what the public has seen. But jr is an idiot that had no clue... that's all. Not sure how you can't agree on that one, but whatever. (actually, this thread is about "meaningful discourse" - but like far too many threads, it went off the rails long ago...) |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |