|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Reasoning failed..... /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1505242532 Message started by raydawg on 09/12/17 at 11:55:31 |
|
Title: Reasoning failed..... Post by raydawg on 09/12/17 at 11:55:31 Why, well here, its right here..... Staring you right in the face: But in the interview and the book, she emphasizes the role played by Russia. While the special counsel investigation ramps up, Clinton told USA Today there “certainly was communication and there certainly was an understanding of some sort” between Moscow and Trump’s team. “Because there's no doubt in my mindthat Putin wanted me to lose and wanted Trump to win. And there's no doubt in my mind that there are a tangle of financial relationships between Trump and his operation with Russian money. And there's no doubt in my mind that the Trump campaign and other associates have worked really hard to hide their connections with Russians,” she said. What mind? No evidenced to support you have one ;D Love this following line, it is just hilarious, SMH... She clarified, "I happen to believe in the rule of law and believe in evidence, so I'm not going to go off and make all kinds of outrageous claims. But if you look at what we've learned since [the election], it's pretty troubling." This is almost like the media playing with a mentally handicapped person, for their own entertainment...... :-[ |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by pg on 09/12/17 at 12:08:56 Someone from the left please tell her to just go away. Best regards, |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by WebsterMark on 09/12/17 at 12:18:14 The Right are the ones keeping her in the spotlight. You think any Democrats want to be associated with her? On my twitter, I asked if we could retroactively rename Hurricane Irma to Hurricane Hilary since neither was a strong as first thought and now we have to listen to all these excuses why not. |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by raydawg on 09/12/17 at 12:34:05 7E696F636C7C0E0 wrote:
Yeah, they have tried to get her to STFU.... |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by raydawg on 09/12/17 at 12:37:58 043631202736211E322138530 wrote:
I think it is solely Hillary, her narcissistic bent is the only place she can live in.... And I think she will run again, as a martyrdom candidate, even if its a third party run. |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by T And T Garage on 09/12/17 at 12:43:22 3E292F232C3C4E0 wrote:
Look at her approval ratings. We already did. |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by WebsterMark on 09/12/17 at 13:52:57 I think it is solely Hillary, her narcissistic bent is the only place she can live in.... And I think she will run again, as a martyrdom candidate, even if its a third party run. I'll take that bet ray. She's done for good. No one's gonna give her money and you can be darn sure she's not going to spend one penny of what's she's accepted in the form of ransom over the years. |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by raydawg on 09/12/17 at 14:14:45 685A5D4C4B5A4D725E4D543F0 wrote:
Ok, what you want to wager? I don't believe she is done..... C'mon Web, you still have liberals saying she WON the POPULAR vote, and therefor she was the people's choice, REGARDLESS of how they say otherwise now, their conviction like the Platt River, a mile wide, a inch deep. Frail little egos that match their frail minds ;D And look, their arguments have not changed, it was Russia, Comey, Bernie, media, that denied the people their Queen, NOT because it was a rejection of her. Have you yet to seen anything otherwise? She could not stand to the scrunity and charge Trump is going through, no f'n way..... But, she is crazy, and disconnected, and she has lots of company in that Clinton machine. What are we to bet? |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by WebsterMark on 09/12/17 at 14:26:15 You name it, it's as safe a bet as there is in the world. They'll run Biden before they run Hilary again. But this bet won't be answered for 3 years so perhaps we'll just argue about it instead! |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by raydawg on 09/12/17 at 14:37:33 4C7E79686F7E69567A69701B0 wrote:
To clarify, I said she will run, even 3rd party, if she can't win the primary. I am saying she will run for office, maybe dogcatcher, again ;) I already stated I think Biden will get the nod. Trump won't run, I think he would rather walk. It will be very interesting to see where this all goes. I think we will all be surprised. I think Bernie will be the Ross Perot third spoke in the race. If he can string together a coherent agenda, I think he could pull it off, as his support is grassroots, not beholden to the Bush and Wassermans swamp creatures of D.C. ;D Think about a wager still, I can ship dungie crabs ;) |
|
Title: Re: Reasoning failed..... Post by pg on 09/18/17 at 18:40:23 5F484E424D5D2F0 wrote:
You might need to tell her again..... ;D http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/18/hillary-clinton-will-not-rule-out-questioning-the-legitimacy-of-the-2016-election/ Hillary Clinton told host Terry Gross on NPR’s “Fresh Air” Monday that she may challenge the results of the 2016 presidential election. Best regards, |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |