SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> But... The Uranium One Deal!
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1510766711

Message started by T And T Garage on 11/15/17 at 09:25:11

Title: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by T And T Garage on 11/15/17 at 09:25:11

Some much needed education on the topic.

You're all welcome.

http://www.yahoo.com/gma/know-uranium-one-deal-013203749--abc-news-topstories.html

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by raydawg on 11/15/17 at 09:34:24

Do you want to dialogue like an adult, or play childish games?

Do you want replies, or just a place to affirm yourself?

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/15/17 at 10:00:01

I don't see the
Mic Drop Moment.
Lots of questions remain.
First
Let's say there is no unethical behavior.
Why is it a good idea?
We are a Net Importer of uranium.
Why hand over control of any to Russia?

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by T And T Garage on 11/15/17 at 10:56:00

5A49514C495F4F280 wrote:

Do you want to dialogue like an adult, or play childish games?

Do you want replies, or just a place to affirm yourself?

I like my affirmation, true. :) But there really isn't a debate on the supposed "clinton uranium scandal".

The only thing she's guilty of is stupidity. To allow her hubby to get paid massively by the russians right around the time of that deal. That's just plain dumb.

There is no "smoking gun" showing any pay-to-play scheme.

BTW, when did this deal go down? How much uranium does russia have compared to the US? Who else was involved in this deal? Where did the uranium go?

Yeah, like I said before - this is what aboutism - nothing more.

Our deal leader sees the walls closing in on him and he points to hillary and says "what about her?"

Sorry, it doesn't work that way tweety.

Oh, and lastly, I wasn't asking for debate in the first place, I was offering education.

You're welcome.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by WebsterMark on 11/15/17 at 11:08:04

"... sees the walls closing in....". Oh that's just precious.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by T And T Garage on 11/15/17 at 11:10:33

596B6C7D7A6B7C436F7C650E0 wrote:

"... sees the walls closing in....". Oh that's just precious.

Yes, yes it is.

Oh, and it's also true.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/15/17 at 11:32:35

66797F7865625363536B79753E0C0 wrote:

No
Aboutism
Just rational thinking

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by WebsterMark on 11/15/17 at 11:33:37

If someone were so inclined, and I'm not suggesting anyone waste their time doing this, you could go back and look at the history of posts involving our two leftist friends regarding their amazing skills of Trump predictions.

He'll get crushed early in the primaries, he'll get crushed at the debates, he can never win the nomination, he'll never beat Hilary, the electoral college won't vote for him, the economy will tank shortly after he's in office, he'll resign before he takes the oath, he'll resign after 30 days, 60 days, 90 days....he'll be impeached and finally, taking top honors, he'll be removed from office using 25th amendment.

At some point in time, wouldn't a person have to be even a little bit right? Somehow demonstrate they have at least a tiny fraction of understanding, some perception of the reality? I'm not asking for the moon here, just some hint that you comprehend the world at large and not CNN sound bites? Come on, throw us a bone. Sew demonstrates this on occasion but our Chicago friend has struck out every at-bat.

Lacking that, why in the world would anyone, other than for entertainment's sake, take anything you say even remotely serious?

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by T And T Garage on 11/15/17 at 11:49:11

1D2F28393E2F38072B38214A0 wrote:

Um, I hate to break it to you web, but new Articles of Impeachment have been put forth today.

But that notwithstanding, I honestly can't understand why you think otherwise.

Tell me how this nimrod compares with his predecessor in his first year.

How much vacation has he taken?

How many bills has he passed?

How many people have been indicted in his administration?

How long has his administration been under investigation?

How much does he tweet?

The list is virtually never ending that shows this guy's ineptitude.

There is one reason and one reason alone that the republicans in the House won't' move for impeachment - their tax overhaul.

I mean, c'mon! Look at this moron's tweet yesterday about the wrong shooting!!

But hey - you go Glen Coco. You do you.

Don't come crying foul when he's either impeached, resigns or is removed.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by WebsterMark on 11/15/17 at 12:12:28

hmmm...... still waiting for evidence why I should do anything other than chuckle at our leftist friend's post. Well yours anyway. You are always wrong, always. Give us something, anything.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/15/17 at 12:34:38

726D6B6C71764777477F6D612A180 wrote:

[quote author=66797F7865625363536B79753E0C0 link=1510766711/0#2 date=1510768801]I don't see the
Mic Drop Moment.
Lots of questions remain.
First
Let's say there is no unethical behavior.
Why is it a good idea?
We are a Net Importer of uranium.
Why hand over control of any to Russia?

No
Aboutism
Just rational thinking

[/quote]

What, no objective discussion?
I'm shocked

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by WebsterMark on 11/15/17 at 12:55:52

What, no objective discussion?
I'm shocked

It doesn't even have to be a discussion. Just something objective; something original; something halfway right.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by T And T Garage on 11/15/17 at 13:06:11

407275646372655A76657C170 wrote:

What, no objective discussion?
I'm shocked

It doesn't even have to be a discussion. Just something objective; something original; something halfway right.

OK. How about the indictments of manafort and gates? How about the arrest of papadopoulos?

Now tell me, is the investigation closed after this?

Ummm... NOPE!

You honestly think nothing will come of this??

;D - whistling while walking past the graveyard is what you're doing.

But hey, you shouldn't fret. Look who's on deck.... pence.

it's almost enough for me to want tweety to stay in.... almost.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by WebsterMark on 11/15/17 at 13:52:10

aw.... that's news? That's original? That's evidence I should pay attention to your opinion, your input on events? Everyone knows those things. You didn't predict that or see it coming or anything.

But you have said Trump would be gone by now. Numerous times. Repeating news isn't a sign of anything other than you can read, cut and paste.....

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by WebsterMark on 11/15/17 at 13:53:12

At least your comrade in arms brings up original topics from time to time. You should learn from him.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by T And T Garage on 11/15/17 at 13:58:26

714344555243546B47544D260 wrote:

aw.... that's news? That's original? That's evidence I should pay attention to your opinion, your input on events? Everyone knows those things. You didn't predict that or see it coming or anything.

Huh? I think I was one of the first on here to say "here we go..." regarding indictments and arrests. You may want to check your facts web.

But you have said Trump would be gone by now. Numerous times. Repeating news isn't a sign of anything other than you can read, cut and paste.....

Hmmm.. don't know if I said "by now", and if I did, then I'm obviously wrong. But suffice it to say, I'd be really surprised if he finishes out his first term.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by T And T Garage on 11/15/17 at 13:59:42

586A6D7C7B6A7D426E7D640F0 wrote:

At least your comrade in arms brings up original topics from time to time. You should learn from him.

Who's that? Bot?

I guess I can concede that. I could stand in far worse shadows.

Like yours for instance! ;D

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by WebsterMark on 11/15/17 at 14:14:25

Well look, had a lot of chuckles today I've got stuff to do the rest of the week. Been fun while I was home but duty calls.

I get paid well from my customers for all the knowledge I've accumulated in my field over the years and I believe payment should be made for services rendered. Is there some place I can send you some money? Maybe $50 to a PO box for part time comedians or something like that? Let me know.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by T And T Garage on 11/15/17 at 14:19:08

4B797E6F68796E517D6E771C0 wrote:

No, I'm good. Please donate it to Planned Parenthood in your own name, thanks.

Now, off to work with you. I'll enjoy the rest of my afternoon in peace and quiet.

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by T And T Garage on 11/17/17 at 15:20:45

Yummmy!

More nothing burgers!!!

http://www.yahoo.com/news/doubts-surface-key-witness-uranium-one-probe-clinton-203614558.html

Gee, I wonder why the cons are trying to make a case about a deal from 2010?

Seems like they might have some problems with their "star witness"...

;D ;D

Oh wait, I forgot to yell "Benghazi!!!"

;D ;D

Title: Re: But... The Uranium One Deal!
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/17/17 at 17:43:47

smear job,” Victoria Toensing, Campbell’s lawyer, told Yahoo News when asked about the doubts law enforcement officials had about her client’s credibility. “That was not the reason” prosecutors removed him as a witness against Mikerin, she said. Instead, it was because “the Obama administration didn’t want to bring a big extortion case against Russia” and risk testimony from Campbell that would have undermined the Uranium One sale and undercut the president’s efforts to “reset” relations with Russia. So instead, “they covered it up,” she said.

The status quo criminals will destroy the witness.
Who knew?

Gutless sack won't admit Libya was a crime.