|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Dumping them? /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1510821240 Message started by raydawg on 11/16/17 at 00:34:00 |
|
Title: Dumping them? Post by raydawg on 11/16/17 at 00:34:00 I heard a thought today re: Clinton's The democrats have finally figured out they are not a asset, but a liability. It explains that Donna Brazil was the first salvo, now they are saying they need to hold Bill accountable for his actions against women.... Not sure if it's true, but I think it's awesome thinking. We have Tweeter because of the Clinton's. |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/16/17 at 10:42:54 I'm surprised they are still as relevant as they are.. And considering the damage done to The Agenda, I'm a little confused about why they haven't shot each other. |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by T And T Garage on 11/16/17 at 10:57:44 6B78607D786E7E190 wrote:
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D We have the moron in office because of the Clintons? Not even gonna call you out for grammar on this one ray, it's just plain stupid. Yes, hillary ran a terrible campaign, but your boy tweety got his nomination from the clueless idiots who thought "what the heck? Let's vote for 'im!" Once again, you point fingers with no ideas of the actual scope of things. It's truly mind boggling... |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by raydawg on 11/16/17 at 12:03:20 Useless...... We don't care what you think, haven't you grasped that yet? |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by T And T Garage on 11/16/17 at 13:57:31 2E3D25383D2B3B5C0 wrote:
Oh no! I'm soooo upset!! <<<<sarcasm Yet you keep responding in my posts - how about that? Then, when I'm not posting for a few days - YOU call me out, or make fun of me for not being on here our responding to your posts! Oh ray - you just don't see how dumb you look, do you? Now run along - I hear your dear tweety needs more people to make excuses for him! ;D |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by raydawg on 11/16/17 at 14:18:09 How old are you? Are you in any medication? |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by T And T Garage on 11/16/17 at 14:22:58 283B233E3B2D3D5A0 wrote:
I'm middle aged and no, I'm not on medication. Are you insinuating something? If so, don't go down that path ray - you seem to have a short memory about those things... |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by raydawg on 11/16/17 at 14:50:17 4D535C5D504D564B390 wrote:
I'm middle aged and no, I'm not on medication. Are you insinuating something? If so, don't go down that path ray - you seem to have a short memory about those things...[/quote] You assume a lot? I ask because you seem to have some reasoning issues, maybe just extremely insecure or immature. I would never knowingly tease a person with a handicap. |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by T And T Garage on 11/16/17 at 14:56:39 4E5D45585D4B5B3C0 wrote:
Ha!! This coming from a guy who wanted me to lick his privates? C'mon ray, don't you know that there's a searchable history on this little forum? Like I said - you're the guy that actually calls me out to respond to posts! You're the one that insinuates that "my mommy" won't let me on the computer to reply to your asinine posts. But I have to say - you've got the conservative playbook down pat. Point to others and say "look at them, they're the bad ones" while at the same time, doing the very same thing you accuse others of. A la roy moore, our orange in chief, the turtle mcconnell, crazy alex, etc. Give it up. You're just so dammed obvious. |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/16/17 at 17:01:50 We elected Trump against a herd of status quo idiots, because another four years of business as usual wouldn't be survivable. Yeah, his supporters see things that we appreciate that drives YOU nuttier. |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by raydawg on 11/16/17 at 19:20:22 https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/16/kirsten-gillibrand-bill-clinton-resign-lewinsky-246532 If it's wrong now, it was wrong then, except........ The party was more important than any stupid woman. We tried to tell you, but no..... |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by MnSpring on 11/17/17 at 11:48:09 7C6F776A6F79690E0 wrote:
Barizil and Gillibrand, Will Both be on the DNC Stage, Looking for support to be the POTUS DFL’s Candidate. They have Learned, how to throw someone under the Buss, Sweep under a Rug, from the TV Evangelists, ‘Crying’. And from the, Citizens, of this Nation, Who want to drain the Swamp. (Who are the people the, ANTIFA Ideals Supporters call: Stupid, Ignorant, Moron, Moronic, Imbecile, Short-sighted, petulant child, transparent, clueless idiots, Move along and stay ignorant, Etc. Etc. Etc.) |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by raydawg on 11/17/17 at 12:43:33 4665587B7962656C0B0 wrote:
Barizil and Gillibrand, Will Both be on the DNC Stage, Looking for support to be the POTUS DFL’s Candidate. They have Learned, how to throw someone under the Buss, Sweep under a Rug, from the TV Evangelists, ‘Crying’. And from the, Citizens, of this Nation, Who want to drain the Swamp. (Who are the people the, ANTIFA Ideals Supporters call: Stupid, Ignorant, Moron, Moronic, Imbecile, Short-sighted, petulant child, transparent, clueless idiots, Move along and stay ignorant, Etc. Etc. Etc.) [/quote] Dude..... I am so ready to give a chick the office. We need a new perspective, and if a woman, as prez can be as efficient and as caring, as my wife, then I say, HELL YES! Guys seem to always think any challenge of their "stance" is a challenge to the size of their wang..... And that is where the disconnect to reality asserts itself ;D How about a Connie Rice Donna Brazile ticket, one a brilliant mind, the other, as the enforcer ;) |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/17/17 at 15:04:00 Rice is a swamp creature. |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by T And T Garage on 11/17/17 at 15:07:23 47544C51544252350 wrote:
Well ray, if you were wondering about identity politics, you just posted the candidates that exemplify it! Well done! ;D |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by raydawg on 11/17/17 at 15:36:15 081711160B0C3D0D3D05171B50620 wrote:
How so buddy? She might have swam in that swamp, but she toweled off...... From her position under the B-2 administration, she was constrained by the fool she worked for. Is a competent doctor/surgeon, held accountable for the failure of a hospitals support staff? |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by MnSpring on 11/17/17 at 17:04:01 25362E33362030570 wrote: Dude..... I am so ready to give a chick the office. We need a new perspective, and if a woman, as prez can be as efficient and as caring, as my wife, then I say, HELL YES! Guys seem to always think any challenge of their "stance" is a challenge to the size of their wang..... And that is where the disconnect to reality asserts itself ;D How about a Connie Rice Donna Brazile ticket, one a brilliant mind, the other, as the enforcer ;) [/quote] A Woman in office. Not a problem. Their are just as many ’smart’ Women as Men. (As well as dumb ones) Rice If she would have run in 2007, I think she would have won in a Heartbeat, She didn’t, don’t know why. (Didn’t want to, was told Not to, or didn’t want to commit Suicide, with two holes in the head, with hands tied behind her back ?) 2021, She won’t do it. Brazil As one of the top two ? I don’t trust her at ALL. I Believe she would be a, total, PUPPET. Of whoever lines her Pockets the Best Gillibrand Don’t know enough about her, ‘yet’. What I have seen/heard/observed, (Of course according to the resident, ANTIFA Ideals Supporter Observation, is NOT really, ‘Real') She, also, has learned how, to throw people under the Bus, sweep under the rug, because she wants, the, ‘Deplorable’ vote. (Has learned, but hasn’t had to use the, crocodile tears the Evangelists cry on TV, yet.) Paulin She would be a Female Trump. Sometimes, ‘grating’, yet I believe her Heart is in the right place. J. Napolitano, K. Sebelius, A. Klobuchar, E. Warren, N. Pelosi, Not a Chance !!!!!!!!! While not as bad as HRC, CLOSE ! Now, their is, not One, of the woman, who would run, Who, ARE, the MOST, Powerful Women in Politics. Because they just will sit back, and ‘Pull’ Strings. But who knows, what could rise, after the ’Swamp’ is drained. |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by raydawg on 11/17/17 at 17:27:55 Thanks for your input..... Its nice to even "think" about changing the perimeters to the office...... If we can honestly look backwards, accessing some of the issues and outcomes, I think we should factor in that men were in charge. Not on its face, a total excuse to failed policies etc, no, however, it is a commonality and a contributing factor. The energy, by self promoting/advancing folks, that offer the observation that there is no difference between a man, and a woman, neglect reality..... Both in a civilized setting, and that of nature itself. My own experience is that a woman has a distinct trait that allows her to be selfless, promoting the welfare of others, before herself, trying to ensure those that love her, needs are met..... Men just do not readily do this..... Men see dependency (on them) as a liability/obligation.... Women see it as a opportunity. At its basic level, I will say its mans pride, that keeps him from such. A mans love is given predicated on conditions being satisfied. To step outside that realm, is not his natural instinct. On the other hand, a woman's love is unconditional, by nature..... It is up to her to move civilization forward, from womb, to sustainability, of her charges. Sure, circumstance can play a very pivotal part on how that love/energy is manifest. But it is a building block to "greater" things, let me call it, civility, than what men have used as motivation, and cause, for his/their actions and reasoning. I would appreciate it if you could offer some more names as possible candidates, this could be a really good beginning :) |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by MnSpring on 11/17/17 at 17:49:58 “…My own experience is that a woman has a distinct trait that allows her to be selfless, promoting the welfare of others, before herself, trying to ensure those that love her, needs are met…” Yes. ‘Mothers’, have a special bond with children. It seems that they will, Always, put the welfare of her children, before herself. And if a POTUS, (Female), has that, dedication, it would be the, 'Nation’, first. (Not their Pockets like HRC) “…if you could offer some more names as possible candidates…” LOL, Then I would be like a ‘D.C. Insider’, Got wood to make, for next year, before it snows up to my Azz. The ’Names’ will come out in 1-2 years And, as it goes, the people, on the platform, may Not be the best at, ‘governing’, but the best Azz Lickers. Well unless, we are all, TOLD, what to think/do, by, (ANTIFA Ideals Supporters) |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/17/17 at 17:55:33 She was a part of the setup for the war after Saddam slapped Kuwait. She gave him the green light to attack Kuwait. |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/17/17 at 17:57:08 I'd vote for Cynthia McKinney in a heartbeat. Rice, never |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by raydawg on 11/17/17 at 18:03:40 2E3137302D2A1B2B1B23313D76440 wrote:
Really..... Please feel free to elaborate. Good point on Rice, I forgot that major tidbit ;D |
|
Title: Re: Dumping them? Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/17/17 at 20:19:07 I have Reasons for what I think. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |