|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> P.C. Correct /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1516654425 Message started by MnSpring on 01/22/18 at 12:53:45 |
|
Title: P.C. Correct Post by MnSpring on 01/22/18 at 12:53:45 Snowing out this morning, wet heavy, and DFI’s on the road. So decided to, stay home and read. News, came on, (wife watches TV), Local news said it is Snowing out. (Gee, absolutely Fanatic grasp of the Obvious) They Also came on with: ’This Morning a Student by the U of M, was Robbed at Gunpoint’ (Description of the Car, AND the Gun) Nothing said about the person ! So, don’t know, Color of skin, heritage, (look like), M/F, Tall Short Skinny Fat, (or combo of). What a Great JOB the: SNOWFLAKE, ‘Blind in one Eye, hard to see out of the other, ‘ , Kum-By-You Singing, Ultra-Progressive, ANTIFA Ideals Supporting, Fairy Dust Sprinkling, Stand in the Street and CRY, people’. Have done by removing such HORRIBLE, descriptive, words, in describing someone. For the, ‘Greater Good’. Let’s see: “Be on the lookout for a, xyz car” Or, “Be on the lookout for a, white skin, 6 foot, skinny, Male, wearing a blue hooded sweatshirt, and jeans, driving a, ‘xyz’ car” Which one, do YOU, think is better ??????? Well now, for the Panty on a bunch crowd, Was the Info known, about the, ‘person’ ? I Don’t know. However, ‘Observed Reality’, says something different. That their was such a good description of the, Car and the Gun. the, ‘Observed Reality’, asks, ‘Why Not The Person”. Well unless, the robber, rolled down the window, just enough to stick out the gun. That, Could be a Possibility. (After all it was, snowing) One also has to remember, ‘Reality’, is NOT, really Real. According to a self admitted, Resident ANTIFA Ideals Supporter. http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2018/01/22/u-of-m-robbery-gun/ http://www.fox9.com/news/student-robbed-at-gunpoint-outside-univ-of-minnesota-building https://www.twincities.com/2018/01/22/umn-student-robbed-at-gunpoint-monday-morning/ A University of Minnesota student was robbed at gunpoint Monday morning on the West Bank campus in Minneapolis. The suspect threatened the student with a semi-automatic handgun, stole a purse and cellphone, then fled in a gray Volkswagen Jetta, the university said in a public safety alert. The robbery took place around 9:35 a.m. outside Hanson Hall, which is part of the Carlson School of Management. No arrests were made and the U did not give a description of the suspect. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/22/18 at 14:30:57 Obviously a white guy.. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by Eegore on 01/23/18 at 07:34:11 3 people were robbed where I am over the weekend. It was snowing. The descriptions don't include race because they had masks on. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by MnSpring on 01/23/18 at 09:03:09 4F6F6D65786F0A0 wrote:
Well Perhaps the, ‘POINT” was missed. The ‘Point’ was, their was not, ANY, Description None, Nada, Nothing. Not just, one thing missing, Their was simply Nothing. So the, “P.C. Correct”, Pendulum, has swing, way, Way, WAY to Far to the Left. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by Eegore on 01/23/18 at 11:03:44 Who omitted information? The news, the victim, the reporter or the police? |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by MnSpring on 01/23/18 at 11:19:34 4060626A7760050 wrote:
Again, I believe the Point is, ‘Why’, not ‘Who’. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 01/23/18 at 11:32:46 55764B686A71767F180 wrote:
Again, I believe the Point is, ‘Why’, not ‘Who’. [/quote] and you are assuming the 'Why' is some PC police or something, but you are assuming just the same |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by MnSpring on 01/23/18 at 11:53:30 7E574A555D4A544174574B4C794A4C514B4C380 wrote:
Well, reasons, for the news/reporter/victim/police, Not giving ANY, description, Could be, (or more than one) Lazy, Stupid, Ignorant, Crooked, Or, PC Correct. Which do you think it is ? |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by raydawg on 01/23/18 at 12:05:05 Does it really matter? In the end isn’t it just marketing through pandering? I don’t read ads marketing bras. If I don’t care for their marking narrative of any given organization, their advertisiers suffer, not me. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 01/23/18 at 12:18:38 597A4764667D7A73140 wrote:
Well, reasons, for the news/reporter/victim/police, Not giving ANY, description, Could be, (or more than one) Lazy, Stupid, Ignorant, Crooked, Or, PC Correct. Which do you think it is ? [/quote] lazy that's the simplest easiest answer, and there is plenty of evidence to support that the media is truly lazy. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by verslagen1 on 01/23/18 at 12:43:14 59706D727A6D736653706C6B5E6D6B766C6B1F0 wrote:
Well, reasons, for the news/reporter/victim/police, Not giving ANY, description, Could be, (or more than one) Lazy, Stupid, Ignorant, Crooked, Or, PC Correct. Which do you think it is ? [/quote] lazy that's the simplest easiest answer, and there is plenty of evidence to support that the media is truly lazy. [/quote] Until someone steps up and says what's ok to call people of various colors, that's the way it's gonna be. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/23/18 at 12:46:50 Can you identity race by voice? Yeah, sometimes not, but more often than not, I can. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 01/23/18 at 12:50:06 293630372A2D1C2C1C24363A71430 wrote:
ever test that theory? like with real experiments or is that just your self realizing hunch you're going on there? |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/23/18 at 12:58:05 You can't listen to a voice and usually get the race of the person? I didn't say it was perfect, but usually I can tell. Are you often confused when a voice behind you addresses you and you turn to speak and discover the person is a man, but you were expecting a woman? It happens, some men talk with the voice of a woman, but rarely. In public, when you hear a conversation, are you rarely correct about the people who are speaking? I'm most often correct. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 01/23/18 at 13:01:44 77686E6974734272427A68642F1D0 wrote:
start writing it down, let me see some data here, as of now, you just got hearsay, would you put someone's freedom at risk based on your "expert" voice detection? |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/23/18 at 15:25:52 I'd include my thoughts on the race of the perpetrator in my report. I know when a voice is CLEARLY one of a specific race and when it's iffy. People who are afraid of what they know are a strange lot. You avoided the questions and pretend that without a scientific study, nothing is known. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 01/23/18 at 15:51:28 233C3A3D20271626162E3C307B490 wrote:
eyewitness testimony is scientifically known to be notoriously flawed, but here you are defending it like it's the gospel. and we are talking about "ear" witness here, not even eyes I just asked if you had any actual documented proof of what you thought, you provided none. then you positioned yourself to be superior to me by having this skill and questioned my own skills, why, I don't know, how are my skills relevant to your skills? I've heard many voices from many bodies I wouldn't expect, so to report in a police record that this voice belongs to this or that, no, I don't think I'd do that based on voice alone. I would hedge it greatly if at all. and since you claim "People who are afraid of what they know are a strange lot." I'll claim people who are over confident with no evidence are dangerous. also, this is just an interesting side tidbit provided by a comedian, Tom Segura, I saw on Netflix: there is a disorder that happens after one gets hit in the head, or some head trauma called foreign accent syndrome. Which is a speech disorder that causes a sudden change to speech so that a native speaker is perceived to speak with a “foreign” accent. So an American would start speaking with a French accent all the sudden, etc... |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by justin_o_guy2 on 01/23/18 at 18:08:33 Okay, officer, he spoke to me, but, I'm not able to say he was probably any particular race. I will ignore the heavy southern accent and the choice of words. I would not want to include clues that might help you find the guy. |
|
Title: Re: P.C. Correct Post by Eegore on 01/24/18 at 08:34:43 1B380526243F3831560 wrote:
Again, I believe the Point is, ‘Why’, not ‘Who’. [/quote] Well my assessment is "Why" is dependent on "Who" did it. "If" the Police omitted information from a victim statement then the reason is different than if a victim did it. I would say the most accurate is that you don't know and that your assessment is mostly speculation. If you know who omitted information I'd be willing to discuss why. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |