SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Con-flict Of Interest
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1519418315

Message started by T And T Garage on 02/23/18 at 12:38:35

Title: Con-flict Of Interest
Post by T And T Garage on 02/23/18 at 12:38:35

So, what say you conservatives?

You think this is OK? (oh yeah, he's "technically" been off the board for 2 years - but you honestly think he's playing fair?)

C'mon.....

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Alo6KvAOjY0[/media]

“David Zatezalo, President Trump’s top official for mining safety, is set to decide over the next two weeks whether to settle a mining-safety lawsuit filed by an industry group that included Zatezalo at the time. The Mine Safety and Health Administration told TYT that MSHA lawyers have cleared Zatezalo to decide the matter.

The lawsuit was filed in March 2013 by the Kentucky Coal Association, opposing the Obama Administration’s use of a mine-safety rule known as POV, or Pattern of Violations. POV accelerates the penalty process for mining companies that repeatedly violate safety rules. Zatezalo, now the assistant secretary of mine health and safety, served on the Kentucky Coal Association board of directors through 2014.

As has been previously reported, through late 2014 Zatezalo was also chairman of Rhino Resource Partners, a mining company which twice ran afoul of POV during his tenure there. Rhino’s current CEO, Rick Boone, served as an executive under Zatezalo, and now sits on the Kentucky Coal Association executive committee.

The lawsuit filed by the Kentucky Coal Association was combined by a judge with other suits challenging the government’s use of the POV rule against repeat offenders. (Zatezalo also sat on the board of the Ohio Coal Association prior to its participation in the lawsuit.) The court has now given MSHA until March 9 to decide whether to settle the suit by rolling back its use of the POV rule.”

Title: Re: Con-flict Of Interest
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 02/23/18 at 14:19:11

If a corporation cuts corners and people suffer, they need to fine And Jail the upper management who allowed it.
The injured parties and their families need to be Well compensated.

If that guy is affected by the ruling, certainly that's a glaring conflict of interest. Anyone who has stocks or related to someone who has stocks shouldn't be making decisions about slapping the company.

Title: Re: Con-flict Of Interest
Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 02/23/18 at 14:29:57

786761667B7C4D7D4D75676B20120 wrote:

and yet... here's Trump's boy!

and sorry about the whataboutism I'm doing here: what about Trump himself? with his business interests? his family's business interests? Kushner? Ivanka getting clearance in China for some product there.... ???

Title: Re: Con-flict Of Interest
Post by T And T Garage on 02/23/18 at 15:10:11

240D100F07100E1B2E0D11162310160B1116620 wrote:

As I've been saying from the start... could you imagine the fury from the conservatives if Obama had as many conflicts of interest and rampant nepotism in his administration?

Staggering hypocrisy and the dumb-a$$ democrats just let it slide....

Title: Re: Con-flict Of Interest
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 02/23/18 at 15:29:18

Wow,,
It's pointless.

How about you
Offer examples.
I don't know hoot about her and China.
Apparently it's horrible.

Title: Re: Con-flict Of Interest
Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 02/23/18 at 17:23:03

2D3234332E2918281820323E75470 wrote:

Wow,,
It's pointless.

How about you
Offer examples.
I don't know hoot about her and China.
Apparently it's horrible.

it's not horrible quit overacting. but it is apparent.

of course you don't know hoot about it cause your sources only give you one side, but you won't look elsewhere, oh no, cant' trust them "lefty" sites.

to not hijack this thread I'll start a new one, maybe, but not tonight, I"m done here with you all for tonight.