SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Global delusion
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1520857046

Message started by WebsterMark on 03/12/18 at 05:17:26

Title: Global delusion
Post by WebsterMark on 03/12/18 at 05:17:26

Could the decades long global delusion finally be wearing off? Are more and more people beginning to come to their senses?

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/should-we-chill-out-about-global-warming/

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by LANCER on 03/12/18 at 21:11:32


774542535445526D41524B200 wrote:
Could the decades long global delusion finally be wearing off? Are more and more people beginning to come to their senses?

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/should-we-chill-out-about-global-warming/



For 9/10ths of the population of the world, the answer is NO.

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by WebsterMark on 03/13/18 at 04:34:44

If true, then that's down from 95% and next year maybe it will be 85% and the year after that, 80% and so on. Eventually the majority will agree with what many have been saying for decades now: Sure, humans impact temps, but to a much smaller degree than activist (I mean scientist) predicted and that the vast majority of the warming we saw was part of an as of yet not understood cycle.

Question for you, a very short 15,000 years ago, could you have stood on the shores of Chicago's Lake Michigan? No, it was a glacier. Has there been warming over that 15,000 years? Yep. Did we have anything to do with it? Nope.

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by T And T Garage on 03/13/18 at 05:59:38


734146575041566945564F240 wrote:
If true, then that's down from 95% and next year maybe it will be 85% and the year after that, 80% and so on. Eventually the majority will agree with what many have been saying for decades now: Sure, humans impact temps, but to a much smaller degree than activist (I mean scientist) predicted and that the vast majority of the warming we saw was part of an as of yet not understood cycle.

Question for you, a very short 15,000 years ago, could you have stood on the shores of Chicago's Lake Michigan? No, it was a glacier. Has there been warming over that 15,000 years? Yep. Did we have anything to do with it? Nope.


Three words for you genius.....

RATE.  OF.  CHANGE.

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/13/18 at 07:27:54

I
Destroyed
That
Claim
And
Its
Importance
Months
Ago.
The FACT IS
The dire consequences that the warmlarmists screeched and screamed about,,

Haven't happened
In OVER TWENTY YEARS.
So.
STFU already.
The GW religion is based on the lies of Gore. You were duped.
Stop believing the lies and FFS stop trying to make everyone accept life through Your loony tunes lens.

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by raydawg on 03/13/18 at 08:15:26

Three words for you genius.....

RATE.  OF.  CHANGE.


Snarky name calling, it works for you?

As with the democrats refusing to believe the republican house finding on Russian/Trump collusion......BECAUSE it was a republican agenda driven finding, is the EXACT same liberty others can use to question who gather the rate of change data, as agenda driven.

See, and I didn't need to be snide.

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by verslagen1 on 03/13/18 at 08:27:11


322C23222F322934460 wrote:
Three words for you genius.....

RATE.  OF.  CHANGE.

Learning punctuation from mnspring?

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by raydawg on 03/13/18 at 08:32:50


2F3C2B2A35383E3C3768590 wrote:
[quote author=322C23222F322934460 link=1520857046/0#3 date=1520945978]Three words for you genius.....

RATE.  OF.  CHANGE.

Learning punctuation from mnspring?[/quote]

Ya know, it seems as a few might be using more than one aliases in posting......sometimes you can see a subtle likeness,.

Good Catch!

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by T And T Garage on 03/13/18 at 08:48:06


5C4F574A4F59492E0 wrote:
Three words for you genius.....

RATE.  OF.  CHANGE.


Snarky name calling, it works for you?

As with the democrats refusing to believe the republican house finding on Russian/Trump collusion......BECAUSE it was a republican agenda driven finding, is the EXACT same liberty others can use to question who gather the rate of change data, as agenda driven.

Actually, no ray - you're comparing apples to oranges.  The republican house finding is a joke, because it basically states that russia did indeed mess with the election, but it messed with both sides... yeah, like doping all the horses in a race...lol.  Sorry, russia's not that stupid.

The climate data - the rate of change - is a fact.  There is no faking core samples or meteorological data.  There is no debate on man's impact on the climate.  The rate of change is the crux.

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

But go ahead and deny all you want.  It's happening whether anyone believes it or not.

See, and I didn't need to be snide.



Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by T And T Garage on 03/13/18 at 08:49:15


2D3E2928373A3C3E356A5B0 wrote:
[quote author=322C23222F322934460 link=1520857046/0#3 date=1520945978]Three words for you genius.....

RATE.  OF.  CHANGE.

Learning punctuation from mnspring?[/quote]

Yeah, I guess my ire got the best of me.

How's this vers:

Three words for you genius:

1.  Rate
2.  Of
3.  Change

Better?

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by T And T Garage on 03/13/18 at 08:50:05


4D5E465B5E48583F0 wrote:
[quote author=2F3C2B2A35383E3C3768590 link=1520857046/0#6 date=1520954831][quote author=322C23222F322934460 link=1520857046/0#3 date=1520945978]Three words for you genius.....

RATE.  OF.  CHANGE.

Learning punctuation from mnspring?[/quote]

Ya know, it seems as a few might be using more than one aliases in posting......sometimes you can see a subtle likeness,.

Good Catch![/quote]


Yep, you're right about one thing - you truly are an idiot.  (hey, your words, not mine)

Title: Re: Global delusion
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/13/18 at 10:44:32

republican house finding is a joke, because it basically states that russia did indeed mess with the election, but it messed with both sides... yeah, like doping all the horses in a race...lol.  Sorry, russia's not that stupid.

The intent was to sow discord.
Gotterdone...

Wikileaks, never shown to be Wrong, said Russia and No State was the source of the emails.
Hinted Seth Rich was, and offered a reward for the killers.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/16/indictment-reveals-russians-also-organized-anti-trump-rallies-after-election.html

Search

Russians promoted anti Trump rally

Plenty more

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.