|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> The consequences of liberalism /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1521114457 Message started by WebsterMark on 03/15/18 at 04:47:37 |
|
Title: The consequences of liberalism Post by WebsterMark on 03/15/18 at 04:47:37 SECRET DEBATE TIP FOR GOP March 14, 2018 Ann Coulter On CBS's "60 Minutes" Sunday night, Lesley Stahl asked Education Secretary Betsy DeVos about the "institutional racism" in school discipline. It was like neither of them had ever heard of Nikolas Cruz. The Parkland, Florida, school shooter is our most recent case study of what happens when liberals start babbling about "institutional racism." There's never been such an incredible paper trail as there is with Cruz, leading straight from idiotic liberal ideas directly to mass murder. We know that Broward County Public Schools knew about Cruz's felonies. We know that his behavior wasn't reported because it would negatively impact the record of a student of color. The school district bragged about the policy. Perhaps having no criminal record would have helped Cruz get a good job someday. But it is a fact that one of the consequences of not reporting his crimes was that HE COULD GET A GUN. Unless liberals are going to say that guns had nothing to do with the Parkland shooting, it was the racial bean-counting in school discipline that unleashed this psychotic on innocent students and teachers at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School four weeks ago. Stahl treated as cold hard fact the idea that schools punish "students of color more harshly than their white classmates," citing this real-world example: "Let's say" -- lots of serious journalism begins with "let's say" -- "there's a disruption in the classroom and a bunch of white kids are disruptive and they get punished, you know, go see the principal. But the black kids are, you know, they call in the cops. I mean, that's the issue: who and how the kids who disrupt are being punished." I remember this plot on "Law & Order," but there aren't many examples of it in real life. Teachers in St. Paul, Minnesota, have been hospitalized and permanently disabled by their "disruptive" African-American students, thanks to former St. Paul Public Schools Superintendent Valeria Silva's commitment to ending the "school-to-prison pipeline." One kid was "disruptive" by punching and strangling a science teacher, John Ekblad, giving him a concussion and permanent brain injuries. The African-American student walked away from Ekblad's body splayed out on the floor, saying, "Did you see me slam that white-ass teacher?" This "disruptive" rascal was sentenced to 90 days house arrest and probation. Luckily, he wasn't punished more severely, or he might have ended up on the "school-to-prison pipeline." I'm sure he's doing well now. A popular grade-school teacher, Debbie York, had to undergo repeated surgeries after an 85-pound first-grade student of color assaulted her when she tried to intervene as he was throwing furniture and biting other children. He threw a chair at York, missed her, then body-slammed her, causing permanent injuries. While on sick leave after the incident, York emailed parents to explain why she was gone. For informing parents about the assault in class, she was promptly cashiered from her 30-year teaching career. What matters isn't the safety of teachers and students. Nor is it whether anyone is learning anything. All that matters is that no one ever writes down the bad behavior of black and brown students. When public school teachers -- not a conservative bunch -- in Minnesota -- not a conservative state -- are showing up in a boiling rage at school board meetings to complain about their African-American students having carte blanche to bully and defy them, the problem may not be that our schools are being run by Bull Connor. One teacher, David McGill, complained that an out-of-control African-American fourth-grader had "significantly compromised an entire year of science instruction for the great majority of his classmates." He said there was nothing he could do about it because of the school's racial quotas on student discipline. Superintendent Silva's response was to get snippy about the teacher's word choice: "You said they are 'infecting' other children. I almost fell out of my chair," Silva said. "I didn't mean it --" "Doesn't matter. You said it." Eventually, the school district had to buy off Silva with a $800,000 severance agreement just to get her to leave. It was her or the teachers. CBS's Stahl is either an ideologue, intentionally painting a picture that is the polar opposite of the truth by implying that students of color are the true victims here -- or else she is so stupid and untutored in the subject that she has no business reporting on it. I could go either way. Your choice. (We need an expression for this sort of broadcast. Something like ... FAKE NEWS!) A smart Republican would be dying for liberals to bring up the "school-to-prison pipeline." The more it is talked about, the more ripe the insanity becomes. A kid expelled from high school is twice as likely to end up in prison! Yeah, because he's a thug. He's a thug when he's in high school and he's a thug a few years later, when he's an adult. NO! It's keeping a record of his crimes that's the problem! By the time he becomes an adult, he has no choice. No Democrat should be allowed to run for election this year without taking a position on Parkland's "school-to-prison pipeline" policy. Worried about suburban moms, Republicans? Make the Democrats defend a toxic ideology that prohibits students of color from being arrested for their criminal acts. They'll either defend it and lose the parents, or they'll oppose it and lose their George Soros funding. Republicans should pray that the Parkland shooting comes up in debates. You hear "Parkland," and you say: "Let's talk about the 'school-to-prison pipeline.'" You hear, "equity in school discipline," and you say: "Nikolas Cruz." COPYRIGHT 2018 ANN COULTER DISTRIBUTED BY ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/15/18 at 06:38:33 He's not the only idiot who came from the promise program. |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by T And T Garage on 03/15/18 at 06:56:44 I take it this is for posting batsh!t crazy ann coulter posts? Well web - here's more from your hero: "Any growing interest in soccer can only be a sign of the nation's moral decay." -Ann Coulter on American fans of World Cup soccer "There is a growing body of evidence that radiation in excess of what the government says are the minimum amounts we should be exposed to are actually good for you and reduce cases of cancer." -Ann Coulter, on fears over the fallout from Japan's nuclear crisis, Bill O'Reilly interview, March 18, 2011 "You will find liberals always rooting for savages against civilization." –Ann Coulter "They didn't root for the Nazis against civilization." –Bill O'Reilly "Oh yes they did. ... It was only when Hitler invaded their precious Soviet Union that at the last minute they came in and suddenly started saying oh no, now you have to fight Hitler." –Ann Coulter, "The O'Reilly Factor," May 7, 2010 "I don't really like to think of it as a murder. It was terminating Tiller in the 203rd trimester. ... I am personally opposed to shooting abortionists, but I don't want to impose my moral values on others." --on the murder of Kansas abortion doctor George Tiller, FOX News interview, June 22, 2009 "We just want Jews to be perfected, as they say." --arguing that it would be better if we were all Christian "If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women. It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it's the party of women and 'We'll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'" "If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot." "I was going to have a few comments about John Edwards but you have to go into rehab if you use the word f*g**t." --at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference "I'm more of a man than any liberal." "These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband's deaths so much." -on 9/11 widows who have been critical of the Bush administration "We need somebody to put rat poisoning in Justice Stevens' creme brulee. That's just a joke, for you in the media." "Liberals love America like O.J. loved Nicole." "There are a lot of bad republicans; there are no good democrats." "Liberals are stalwart defenders of civil liberties – provided we’re only talking about criminals." "We need to execute people like (John Walker Lindh) in order to physically intimidate liberals." "Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots." "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity." "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building." Yeah, ann knows what she's talking about...... go right ahead and hook your car to that crazy train. ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by WebsterMark on 03/15/18 at 07:22:33 You do know some of those comments are humor in order to make a broader point don't you?..... And who would argue against any of those broader points? Pick one. My personal favorite: "I don't really like to think of it as a murder. It was terminating Tiller in the 203rd trimester |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by T And T Garage on 03/15/18 at 07:36:01 122027363120370824372E450 wrote:
Tiny minds think alike. Good for you web, good for you. |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by WebsterMark on 03/15/18 at 07:48:12 Wow...that's an in-depth analysis worthy of CNN.... |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by WebsterMark on 03/15/18 at 08:03:21 Seems you've been slapped around by Ann like so many other Leftist.... as she said; she's more of a man that any liberal! |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by Serowbot on 03/15/18 at 09:01:56 That explains the Adam's apple... :-? |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by raydawg on 03/15/18 at 09:34:14 677976777A677C61130 wrote:
Tiny minds think alike. Good for you web, good for you. [/quote] TT.....when will you stop the snark, that you find so distasteful, and detrimental, that drives away liberal viewers from participating here? |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by T And T Garage on 03/15/18 at 10:55:26 7F4D4A5B5C4D5A65495A43280 wrote:
"Slapped around"? Oh, ok web. Whatever makes you feel good. Like I said, you wanna hook your car to that crazy train, be my guest. She's right up there with crazy alex jones. Yeah, you're in good company. ;D |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by T And T Garage on 03/15/18 at 10:55:55 5741564B53464B50240 wrote:
LOL ;D ;D ;D ;D +100 to Bot!! |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/15/18 at 10:56:44 That's not snark. That's leftie decorum. |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by T And T Garage on 03/15/18 at 11:05:08 32213924213727400 wrote:
Well ray, when someone quotes the likes of ann coulter, what do you expect? Do you see me quoting farrakhan or sharpton or any number of lunatic-level liberals? Nope. If someone believes that liberalism is as bad as coulter thinks it is - well, there's a problem. Someone like that will get no respect from me. More than once I've posted on this little forum about the need of conservatism. I've never stated that it's all bad - only some of the conservatives themselves are. Huge difference. The likes of web and others fail to see the need for both sides. I see an awful lot more of folks like me and Lost and Serow out in the real world than them. If my "snark" puts people off, so be it. You're free to complain. But don't be a hypocrite about it. How many times have you called me "sweetie" or made some reference to a sexual act you want me to perform on you? At least I own it. |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/15/18 at 11:07:10 Situational ethics and decorum He's got it all |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 03/15/18 at 11:42:58 32213924213727400 wrote:
Tiny minds think alike. Good for you web, good for you. [/quote] TT.....when will you stop the snark, that you find so distasteful, and detrimental, that drives away liberal viewers from participating here? [/quote] you think the "snark" is driving away liberals from here?? no, it's threads like this one, OVER AND OVER AND OVER again. You all don't like liberals, your disdain for them is clear and plain for any to see, why would anyone want to post here if they are just going to get their heads taken off for have a left of center view about anything. you'll just lump them in with the most extreme of the extreme and think they think like every liberal you hear mocked on your conservative internet, radio or tv shows, why should they bother here? |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 03/15/18 at 11:44:58 2D333C3D302D362B590 wrote:
Well ray, when someone quotes the likes of ann coulter, what do you expect? Do you see me quoting farrakhan or sharpton or any number of lunatic-level liberals? Nope. If someone believes that liberalism is as bad as coulter thinks it is - well, there's a problem. Someone like that will get no respect from me. More than once I've posted on this little forum about the need of conservatism. I've never stated that it's all bad - only some of the conservatives themselves are. Huge difference. The likes of web and others fail to see the need for both sides. I see an awful lot more of folks like me and Lost and Serow out in the real world than them. If my "snark" puts people off, so be it. You're free to complain. But don't be a hypocrite about it. How many times have you called me "sweetie" or made some reference to a sexual act you want me to perform on you? At least I own it. [/quote] [smiley=thumbup.gif] [smiley=thumbup.gif] |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by raydawg on 03/15/18 at 12:06:18 I guess you can justify it, sorta like how Trump does, he blames others for his actions, as he is just responding to the the stuff others said, first. I'm not sure that is working out all that well. I wonder if we don't have anything constructive, to say,add, then I wonder about our need, to say it, at all? Who we made at, them, or ourselves? Going to work, have a good day, peace. |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by WebsterMark on 03/15/18 at 13:46:00 Its not necessarily liberals that I disdain Lost, its leftist. There's a difference. Leftist are like terrorIST, communIST, socialIST. |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by WebsterMark on 03/15/18 at 13:50:02 ... and the difference between Ann Coulter and Al Sharpton for example, is that any semi-intelligent person can argue and destroy Al Sharpton's positions. TT is incapable of arguing against Coulter's position but that's not because of who he is it's just because who she is. She's just miles above him. He can't argue with her. Notice he didn't even try. |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 03/15/18 at 14:50:47 083A3D2C2B3A2D123E2D345F0 wrote:
there are right wing conservative terrorist too, fundamentalists Christians have a LOT more in common with fundamentalists Muslims than I'm comfortable with, and there are right wing AnarchIST, FascIST, Authoritarians that put "leftists" to shame. you're over re-acting, just like Ann Coulter, she's a cartoon, I'm not even bothering reading that dribble, she's a special kind of "ist" too, or at least has strong "-ist" tendencies |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by T And T Garage on 03/15/18 at 15:55:14 003235242332251A36253C570 wrote:
LMAO - really web? It's like trying to debate a two year old... your little post from ann is 100% conjecture. There's never been such an incredible paper trail as there is with Cruz, leading straight from idiotic liberal ideas directly to mass murder. We know that Broward County Public Schools knew about Cruz's felonies. We know that his behavior wasn't reported because it would negatively impact the record of a student of color. The school district bragged about the policy. What I've bolded above is a lie. A flat out lie. If you think it's true - prove it. What matters isn't the safety of teachers and students. Nor is it whether anyone is learning anything. All that matters is that no one ever writes down the bad behavior of black and brown students. What a crock of sh!t. "and the difference between Ann Coulter and Al Sharpton for example, is that any semi-intelligent person can argue and destroy Al Sharpton's positions. " ;D ;D ;D Yeah, ann coulter's positions are soooo concrete, right? The only thing she does is hate liberals. Wow - what an accomplishment. See my post to ray about how I don't hate conservatives policies, but moron conservatives like ann coulter. People like you and her are why we have the moron we do in the oval office. BTW, that's not a platitude, it's a charge. Like I said web - hook yourself to the likes of coulter - I'm sure you'll do great. Hey, since you're such a "fantastic salesman", maybe you should bring a copy of some of her books with you on sales calls! LMAO!!!! |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by T And T Garage on 03/15/18 at 15:55:48 4C7E79686F7E69567A69701B0 wrote:
Liar. See what I did there? |
|
Title: Re: The consequences of liberalism Post by justin_o_guy2 on 03/15/18 at 20:14:17 Yeah, you underscored his point. Thanks |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |