|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Hannity's insanity... /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1523977826 Message started by Serowbot on 04/17/18 at 08:10:26 |
|
Title: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/17/18 at 08:10:26 He's not a client,.. but he wants to claim attorney client privilege?... Th Fox swamp is draining. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by raydawg on 04/17/18 at 10:21:25 He must have small hands too! |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/17/18 at 10:24:37 44574F52574151360 wrote:
Vrrrroooooommm!... |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by raydawg on 04/17/18 at 10:46:07 6F796E736B7E73681C0 wrote:
Vrrrroooooommm!...[/quote] HAHAHAHAHAHAHAhahaha......... He prolly wears boots that make him look taller too! ;D |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/17/18 at 10:51:53 This is all Hillary's fault... Hannity will explain how as soon as he can think of something. :-? |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by raydawg on 04/17/18 at 11:51:03 4254435E46535E45310 wrote:
Gee, what is taking that Russian tang? So many experts said he would be gone before my tulips were planted. Glad only fools pay attention to those experts ;D |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by T And T Garage on 04/17/18 at 14:21:56 Like I've said many times before, you can't make this stuff up... Look at the conservatives and how far they've gone off the deep end. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/18/18 at 09:15:38 Will Fox fire him?... He's their top dude in ratings,... but,... All that partisan reporting on a topic he should have disclosed his involvement in,... and the obvious affair cover-up he won't admit to. I think they'll have to fire him... like they did O’Reilly. Fox swamp draining. :-? |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by MnSpring on 04/18/18 at 09:44:52 So the FBI, can raid a Attorneys office and take files. Yet they can NOT, Take files from H.R.C., DNC, DFL, D.B., P.P., EPA, etc. Why ? |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/18/18 at 09:48:02 They can and did both with warrants... |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by raydawg on 04/18/18 at 09:49:56 Its gonna be a BIG swamp draining....... Wide and deep. Get every creep. Will be years, Till the mud won't seep. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/18/18 at 15:30:05 Here's a thought... If Hannity didn't think he was a client, why did he ask Cohen not release his name as the third client?... He's toast... :-? |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by eau de sauvage on 04/19/18 at 05:58:59 At least he has a good lawyer...oh wait... https://www.vox.com/2018/4/18/17252554/trump-cohen-new-york-state-laws |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/19/18 at 08:17:19 Hannity says he has 7 lawyers on retainer that he consults with from time to time,... makes you wonder why he would choose to consult with an expert that exclusively handles the hushing of illicit affairs... Toast,... well done?... :-? |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by MnSpring on 04/19/18 at 08:40:21 3721362B33262B30440 wrote:
Were any of them, "covert”, search warrants', ? "Court filing reveals prosecutors obtained “covert” search warrants" Here is a description on, 'covert” search warrants', from: https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/covert-entry-search-warrant/ "...A covert-entry search warrant authorizes a law-enforcement officer to clandestinely enter private premises during the absence of the owner or occupant without prior notice. Such law-enforcement officer can search the premises and collect intangible evidence. They can collect photographs and eyewitness information. This is also termed as sneak-and-peek search warrant or surreptitious-entry search warrant ..." |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/19/18 at 09:22:37 I don't know which were "covert" or not,... but if a judge approves it, it's for reason. Covert, is done when a judge believes there is adequate reason to suspect that the subject will try to destroy or hide evidence if alerted prior to search... |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/19/18 at 16:30:16 but if a judge approves it, it's for reason. Everything is done for a reason. Not all reasons are Right. That judge misbehave. That was a politically motivated move. The judge may have gained ground with the left, but it's probably not gonna work out well for the judge in the long run. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/19/18 at 16:50:02 If Cohen wasn't going to hide or destroy any evidence,... how will the "covert" search make any difference?... Do you believe he would have volunteered the exact same evidence without the search?.... If so,... then where's the problem?... :-?... |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/19/18 at 17:53:22 I thought this was about the judge releasing hannitys name. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by Serowbot on 04/19/18 at 18:17:35 26393F3825221323132B39357E4C0 wrote:
The judge had no idea who the third client was until Cohen revealed him to be Hannity.. It could have been Bill Clinton or Matt Lauer for all she knew. It could have been Obama... (not likely, but it could) How could it possibly be politically motivated?... |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/19/18 at 20:07:08 It's Trumps lawyer. You don't really think that other client wasn't someone on the right, do you? That name had no business being revealed in public. If the judge didn't know then that name should only have been revealed in private. Releasing names like that is wrong. I expect repercussions for the judge. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 04/20/18 at 05:52:37 6F7076716C6B5A6A5A62707C37050 wrote:
I don't really know lawyers to be particularly partisan in their selection of clients, you don't think that conservative lawyers only have conservative clients do you? you being represented by a lawyer isn't top secret confidential information or anything. there is nothing wrong here. sorry JOG, as much as you apparently want Hanity to be a victim, he's not, he's just a customer of a lawyer. Lawyers sometimes even advertise their clients to build their future clientelle And Hanity very well might not have done anything wrong by getting occasional legal advice from Cohen, and those particular communications between them should be kept under lawyer client privilege, unless they break the law. for some reason you seem awful upset about Hanity being a little embarrassed |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by justin_o_guy2 on 04/20/18 at 07:07:02 Ohhh, it's because of WHO. I'm not about that. It's a matter of privacy. It's not a public thing. It's not over. Like so many other things that are stewing. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 04/20/18 at 09:07:09 5E4147405D5A6B5B6B53414D06340 wrote:
again, there's nothing private about you being a client for a lawyer. That information in and of itself isn't protected. and Hanity says he wasn't a client, but still wants privilege protection... I don't think it's any secret that Cohen and Hanity were friends, Hanity bragged about it on his TV show several times, and since Cohen is a lawyer, it's not unheard of for a friend to ask another friend about their professional opinion about this or that... I've asked engineer friends to confirm my reading of an electrical wiring diagram before. you seem to be making this into a much bigger deal than it deserves. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by verslagen1 on 04/20/18 at 10:28:48 7B524F50584F514471524E497C4F49544E493D0 wrote:
It's already been shown that mere association with cohen has an implication that he's trying to shut someone up. Of course as long as it's not you, it's ok to trial by press. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 04/20/18 at 10:35:25 6A796E6F707D7B79722D1C0 wrote:
It's already been shown that mere association with cohen has an implication that he's trying to shut someone up. Of course as long as it's not you, it's ok to trial by press.[/quote] eh, I don't quite buy that. Sure that might be his specialty, but it's not like that's the only use for a lawyer, they really do know quite a lot of things. I'm with-holding judgement on that. Like the engineer I asked about the wiring diagram, he wasn't an electrical engineer, or electrician, but he would have better knowledge than me about how to follow the diagram correctly, he just confirmed my understanding of it for me. Sure there'll be some liberals and media types that will jump to conclusions, but the same thing happens with conservative media types as well. and for someone as media savvy as the President, you'd think he'd have some way to help Cohen play the media better... |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by MnSpring on 04/20/18 at 12:23:31 7A534E51594E504570534F487D4E48554F483C0 wrote:
Or it might Not be. The point is, the POTUS Hating Press has decided, it is. Anybody, that is remotely associated, is, guilty. (according to 80% of the Media) |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 04/20/18 at 12:44:12 7D5E634042595E57300 wrote:
Or it might Not be. The point is, the POTUS Hating Press has decided, it is. Anybody, that is remotely associated, is, guilty. (according to 80% of the Media) [/quote] HOLY CRAP!!! you recognized a "might" are you actually picking up nuance in language??? I'd buy you a beer or cookie if you were here . just a bit of fun ribbing for you, no worries There's always the exception to the rule though. and I think you're exaggerating the press's bias in this, not that it's not there, but really isn't as extreme as you think it is. |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by MnSpring on 04/20/18 at 13:39:28 4F667B646C7B657045667A7D487B7D607A7D090 wrote:
Well than make it 75%, That would be 1 out of 4. Where the 1 out of 5. Has been well discussed, on this forum, and many other forums, (Links and all) By Liberal, and Ultra-Liberal people, stating that information. YET ! Perhaps it's 1 - 3.95, as those numbers probably count, Ya HOOOOO, as a, 'news', place ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by FormerlyLostArtist on 04/20/18 at 15:00:58 6744795A5843444D2A0 wrote:
Well than make it 75%, That would be 1 out of 4. Where the 1 out of 5. Has been well discussed, on this forum, and many other forums, (Links and all) By Liberal, and Ultra-Liberal people, stating that information. YET ! Perhaps it's 1 - 3.95, as those numbers probably count, Ya HOOOOO, as a, 'news', place ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D [/quote] again, you have this idea that the liberal media makes up the majority of the media in this nation. and the numbers prove that's not just true. Fox News has more viewers, and there is NO liberal radio in this nation, and newspapers are 60-40 (40% conservative) and online it's easily 50/50, there really is NOT a censorship of conservatives online despite what the conservative media has been telling you. I'd have to run the numbers but when you look at media as a whole, I bet you'd find that more people have access and view/consume conservative media of all types than liberal or mainstream media. but, sure, keep playing the victim and Yahoo is just a news aggregator like google News or MSN or a bunch of news sites online. it's stories are just as valid as the source they pull them from like every other news story/site |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by verslagen1 on 04/20/18 at 15:35:16 725B46595146584D785B47407546405D4740340 wrote:
Oh, there are a few... http://ltradio.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_progressive_talk_radio_stations |
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by eau de sauvage on 04/20/18 at 22:35:58 To get a warrant approved requires a judge to be convinced that there are good reasons. And do remember the judges who approved it were GOP appointees, as well as the three judges who approved the Page surveillance not to mention the judge who selected the judges for the fisa warrants. Will that stop the 'must be political' bullcrap? Obviously not. And Comey was also a GOP and republican member, and Roosenstein also a GOP. 786761667B7C4D7D4D75676B20120 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Hannity's insanity... Post by eau de sauvage on 04/20/18 at 22:37:47 That's a bit naive, democrats also need lawyers to fix up their hush money contracts. 637C7A7D60675666566E7C703B090 wrote:
|
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |