SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Who could have seen that coming?
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1528669666

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 06/10/18 at 15:27:46

Title: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 06/10/18 at 15:27:46

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06/10/latest-boys-beat-girls-track-event-story/

When will the women who think they are men join the NFL?
Since I don't see women playing pro sports against the men, should I conclude they are not interested?
Or unable?
Wait! Gotta be able, because they are equal.

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 06/11/18 at 12:14:14

Well, speak up SJWs.
Explain again how it's so good to allow males to pretend they aren't.
Where is that
Promote Women mantra Now?

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by MnSpring on 06/11/18 at 15:29:53

Right after, All the Boys that can't compete with Boys,
say/identify as a girl, to they can get more than the, 'Participation' trophy.

Uber will not give you a ride home, because you have been drinking, so guess you Have to Drive !

Not to fear, the Ultra-Liberals are here !

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06/11/too-drunk-to-uber/

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by LostArtist on 06/11/18 at 16:03:30

hot air indeed....

and what's wrong with uber discriminating against customers based on a sinful act they are participating in? do they not have that right? I mean you, as a good Christian, wouldn't want them supporting that kind of debauchery would you?

I really don't care, I'm just bored... go ahead and yell at me for whatever you want...

have fun

;)

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by Eegore on 06/11/18 at 16:09:52

I looked back through some of the posts on this subject and haven't seen one that says its "so good to allow males to pretend they aren't."

All the ones I read say sports intermingling should not be allowed. Are you asking for people that aren't on this forum to create an account and defend this?

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by Eegore on 06/11/18 at 16:12:17

"Uber will not give you a ride home, because you have been drinking, so guess you Have to Drive !"

What happened to the previously favored competitive business model? I can't imagine there's a situation where one has to drive inebriated.

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 06/11/18 at 16:12:56

Now we are seeing consequences for pretending boys are girls and the proponents of it have nothing to say.
Again.
Where were they when the the Muslim woman wouldn't wax the MAN who Said he was a woman?
They have no idea what this crap is doing to society.

If I was a driver and a heterosexual couple did what the uber driver Said they did, I'd put them out.

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by MnSpring on 06/12/18 at 14:07:21

0121232B3621440 wrote:

What happened to the previously favored competitive business model? I can't imagine there's a situation where one has to drive inebriated.

Nothing, The,“…previously favored competitive business model…” Is alive and well.

“…I can’t imagine there’s a situation where one has to drive inebriated. …”
I most certainly can. A Inebriated person, calls Uber, they will NOT give him/her a ride home, (Because it is their Policy, if they actually put it in place, after announcing they want to), their is no Lift, no conventional cabs, no friend to drive. The Next choice of the ‘Inebriated’ person Is ?

Again, for the Snowflakes, Uber has every right, to toss their business into the toilet , Every right !.

The point is, did the people making decisions at Uber, SEE, what a wonderful decision it was, allowing boys to ‘identify’ as girls.
So they will try their own brand, of ‘Righteousness’ ?

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 06/12/18 at 14:13:44

Where is the feminist outrage?
Girls are being shut out of positions on a college team. Who can't see the wrong here?
If my daughter got a scholarship denied because she lost to a BOY, I'd be pissed.
The winners are BOYS.
And the lefties cheer.
While the girls get shafted.
WTF?

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by Eegore on 06/12/18 at 18:01:41

"I most certainly can. A Inebriated person, calls Uber, they will NOT give him/her a ride home, (Because it is their Policy, if they actually put it in place, after announcing they want to), their is no Lift, no conventional cabs, no friend to drive. The Next choice of the ‘Inebriated’ person Is ?"

Walk. Stay where you are. Call 911. I do not think driving themselves is the only option. It could be costly but getting inebriated beyond the point of legal driving is a choice and the potential that Uber will not serve you, or broke down, or your phone app failed is part of that equation.

Are we going to say Uber can not allow their drivers to use discretion, or reserve the right to deny service? Specifically Uber drivers, not other professions of any kind.

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by Eegore on 06/12/18 at 18:08:14

332C2A2D30370636063E2C206B590 wrote:

There is outrage, I googled "men identifying as women in sporting competition" on a PC that did not have a browsing history (article favoring algorithms) and easily found articles against men and women intermingling in non-coed sports.

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by MnSpring on 06/12/18 at 18:29:20

19393B332E395C0 wrote:

"I most certainly can. A Inebriated person, calls Uber, they will NOT give him/her a ride home, (Because it is their Policy, if they actually put it in place, after announcing they want to), their is no Lift, no conventional cabs, no friend to drive. The Next choice of the ‘Inebriated’ person Is ?" Walk. Stay where you are. Call 911. I do not think driving themselves is the only option. It could be costly but getting inebriated beyond the point of legal driving is a choice and the potential that Uber will not serve you, or broke down, or your phone app failed is part of that equation. Are we going to say Uber can not allow their drivers to use discretion, or reserve the right to deny service? Specifically Uber drivers, not other professions of any kind.

Walk. Stay where you are. Call 911. I do not think driving themselves is the only option. It could be costly but getting inebriated beyond the point of legal driving is a choice and the potential that Uber will not serve you, or broke down, or your phone app failed is part of that equation.

Did you miss the: “…their is no Lift, no conventional cabs, no friend to drive. The Next choice of the ‘Inebriated’ person Is ?…”
That is: “…’Inebriated…”, Not Sober

“… Are we going to say Uber can not allow their drivers to use discretion, or reserve the right to deny service? Specifically Uber drivers, not other professions of any kind. …”

You can certainly say that. I never did.

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by Eegore on 06/13/18 at 05:46:52

"Did you miss the: “…their is no Lift, no conventional cabs, no friend to drive."

No. My alternative methods did not include Lyft, Cabs or friends due to the parameters of those options not being available. Walking does not include the use of Lyft, Cabs or friends driving. Staying at the location does not involve the use of Lyft, Cabs, or friends. Calling 911 does not involve the calling of Lyft, Cabs or friends.

My assessment is that the parameters were followed when providing alternatives.

"That is: “…’Inebriated…”, Not Sober"

I stated "inebriated beyond the point of legal driving" and would consider that sentence as evidence that I meant to consider the person inebriated and not sober.

I do not consider that when Uber denies service and no Lyft, Cabs, friends or means any means of public or private transportation are available that an inebriated person, being a person who is not sober, has only one option. That one option being "driving". As such I feel alternatives exist, such as walking or if they are inebriated past the point of walking they could crawl. (At that point I would consider them incapacitated and this in most municipalities, and states by law require a medical evaluation.)

They could stay in the location they are given inclement weather would not result in severe injury or death. They could call 911 given they have the resources and get taken to a hospital (Ive seen thousands of these) for evaluation. Also if inclement weather would result in severe injury or death the use of 911 would be considered appropriate by most emergency service standards.

I do not believe if denied a ride when inebriated that driving is the only option.

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by MnSpring on 06/13/18 at 07:36:42

6545474F5245200 wrote:

"Did you miss the: “…their is no Lift, no conventional cabs, no friend to drive." No. My alternative methods did not include Lyft, Cabs or friends due to the parameters of those options not being available. Walking does not include the use of Lyft, Cabs or friends driving. Staying at the location does not involve the use of Lyft, Cabs, or friends. Calling 911 does not involve the calling of Lyft, Cabs or friends. My assessment is that the parameters were followed when providing alternatives. "That is: “…’Inebriated…”, Not Sober"
I stated "inebriated beyond the point of legal driving" and would consider that sentence as evidence that I meant to consider the person inebriated and not sober. I do not consider that when Uber denies service and no Lyft, Cabs, friends or means any means of public or private transportation are available that an inebriated person, being a person who is not sober, has only one option. That one option being "driving". As such I feel alternatives exist, such as walking or if they are inebriated past the point of walking they could crawl. (At that point I would consider them incapacitated and this in most municipalities, and states by law require a medical evaluation.) They could stay in the location they are given inclement weather would not result in severe injury or death. They could call 911 given they have the resources and get taken to a hospital (Ive seen thousands of these) for evaluation. Also if inclement weather would result in severe injury or death the use of 911 would be considered appropriate by most emergency service standards.
I do not believe if denied a ride when inebriated that driving is the only option.

The assessment, you just stated in about 200 +/- words,
Could have been, stated in 16.
“…I do not believe if denied a ride when inebriated that driving is the only option…”
(I am guessing you are ‘sober’ now)

Ever found, ‘Reasonable’, as a quality of a ‘inebriated’, person ?

Title: Re: Who could have seen that coming?
Post by Eegore on 06/13/18 at 09:48:53

"Did you miss the: “…their is no Lift, no conventional cabs, no friend to drive. The Next choice of the ‘Inebriated’ person Is ?…”"

By my assessment this is a question. The following statement would not be what I consider an answer to that question:

"“…I do not believe if denied a ride when inebriated that driving is the only option…”

While the assessment could have been compressed it would not have answered the posed question which was my intent.

Originally I stated in 12 words:

"I can’t imagine there’s a situation where one has to drive inebriated.”

This was challenged with what I considered a no other option but to drive response due to the lack of Lyft, Cabs or friends. Comparing the original challenged statement to the followed one yield near identical results:

1: "I can’t imagine there’s a situation where one has to drive inebriated.”
2: “…I do not believe if denied a ride when inebriated that driving is the only option…”

This would result in the opinion (1) being answered with essentially the same opinion (2) without addressing the Lyft, Cabs and friends example, so basically ignoring that part of the discussion which would make no sense to me.

"Ever found, ‘Reasonable’, as a quality of a ‘inebriated’, person ?"

Yes but not common. I've been exposed to thousands of intoxicated individuals for the purpose of evaluation so the pool I reference is abnormally large.
Reasonable would to not be inebriated in a location where one would need transportation so I figure the lack of proper planning while sober to be the problem. Especially if one would require Uber as their sole method of transportation and weather is severe.