SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Damnthose Russian bots
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1531189100

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 07/09/18 at 19:18:20

Title: darnthose Russian bots
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/09/18 at 19:18:20

https://www.theepochtimes.com/why-blacks-are-leaving-the-democratic-party_2584977.html

#walkaway is real
And it's reasonable
TDS is gonna perpetuate trump support

Title: Re: darnthose Russian bots
Post by raydawg on 07/09/18 at 19:32:13

November 2020.

New York Times.

Hillary Clinton blames her 3rd presidential election lost on illegal aliens who crossed over the southern borders of the United States to vote.
She has proof from CNN that many of these criminals brought their children, as they cast votes illegally for Trump, which was arranged by Paul Manafort in collusion with Mexico, while he set in solitary confinement in prison.
Ms. Clinton says she has ordered Bob Mueller to open a Special Counsel
Investigation into the matter.
Mr. Mueller’s office reports they will take Ms. Clinton’s recommendation into submission just as soon as they wrap up with the Russian one....

Title: Re: darnthose Russian bots
Post by Eegore on 07/09/18 at 20:48:16

I don't think anyone said #walkaway isn't real. It exists.

But to say a real human posted 20,000 tweets in 3 minutes is excessive. Bots are being used by real humans to artificially move the content to the top of the search list. The "viral" spreading of the content is fabricated, not the movement itself.

Title: Re: darnthose Russian bots
Post by raydawg on 07/09/18 at 21:52:57

Or, it’s a red herring.
Sorta like all those polls pushed by the liberal media saying Hillary was going to win, etc.
Who really knows what data is fabricated to present a needed outcome?

Do you, or are you just regurgitating their facts?

Title: Re: darnthose Russian bots
Post by Eegore on 07/10/18 at 05:59:49

I have not gone to Arc Digital and cross referenced their data with the IP providers, but I can request that this be done. Getting IP's to cooperate could prove difficult.

It is possible but not plausible that the evidence was fabricated. There are thousands of photos that are in reference to news events that happened the same day. The time needed to photoshop an image far exceeds the time it took to distribute the information in real time.

To photoshop 20,000 tweets about an event that happened July 01, and have that distributed same-day would require more man-hours than actually sending the tweets.

So how do we interpret the physical evidence? One person sending 20,000 tweets about an event that happened that day in 3 minutes = the fasted person in the world. Or maybe the images were photoshopped by 20,000 separate people with a two-minute deadline. The tweets were photoshopped or typed ahead of time, then the event was choreographed to match?

The problem I have with saying the information distributed is real and not fabricated is the massive speed in which a response to real-time events is distributed. That isn't a regurgitation, that is my personal assessment based off of data I have actually looked through, and experienced in the past.

Again #walkaway is real - nobody denies its existence, but one person typing that many tweets is most likely not a real person.

Title: Re: darnthose Russian bots
Post by raydawg on 07/10/18 at 08:57:30

Not saying its not real, just us pinheads talking about it make it real, if you understand "that" implication.

Computer technologies is amazing, in the sense any thing can be done as fast as the server will allow.

Using FB as example, you have any idea how quickly they shop you around?
If I am looking at something, and they can search it out quicker than I can, and have a vendors ad load onto my viewer faster than I can Google another possibility....... WHOA.

Now politico folk can use any information they want, interpret it, as needed, and sell it to any buyer who can benefit from its so called, data/information.

Until they can actually vote, it can't change anything that a stump speech can't do, just faster perhaps.
But like the stump speech to be effective, you need a willing participant, first, by wanting to listen to that politician, you attend, or wanting data to back up, what you already want to believe.

Does that make it more clear?

No doubt technology will play a bigger and bigger role in all sorts of life....
I saw it first hand while still working at Boeing.
They had these computer based robotics that are suppose to do what man did for many, many years.
Lots of precision drilling, by hand, within 1000th of a inch tolerance, is needed to assemble aircraft.....
Then you have fasteners, etc, that go into these holes.
Machines were designed to do this faster, cheaper, more accurately....
So far, no go, lots of variables that must be factored in the build stream.

Think of a creek, tumbling down from the mountain, it has been there since mankind's earliest days.
It knows its path, and follows that path, 24/7, 7 days a week, 12 months a year, or does it?
One small deviation, can alter much, if that veritable wasn't factored in.
But how do factor in the unknown?

Well, if Trumps election taught us anything, it should be just that, you can't ;D