|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> The Moral High Ground /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1533677874 Message started by T And T Garage on 08/07/18 at 14:37:54 |
|
Title: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/07/18 at 14:37:54 With the news - that the President of the United States lied to the American people readers are no doubt wondering "where to from here?" The two schools of thought can be summed up in the choices presented through various and diverse sources, namely, move on or move out. The "move on" crowd's argument goes something like this; 'the President admitted he made a mistake, you have your pound of flesh, now let's move on with the serious issues facing the country'. While this approach is appealing even to some of us who have little regard for the policies of this Administration, it's just not as simple as all that. The 'Move On Crowd's argument is predicated on the notion that presidents, just like the rest of us, ought to be entitled to a little privacy. This argument fails on two grounds; (A) The President made this issue public when he denied it eight months ago and (B) The President is not, by definition, 'like the rest of us'. So we get to the other, and in my view, only school of thought remaining. For America to move on, and we must, the president must move out of the White House. Either the President should resign or be removed from office. Nothing short of this sad conclusion will suffice to restore the institution of the presidency to its former and necessary glory." I did not write this. You all should find out who did..... |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/08/18 at 06:34:20 Do you really think, that anybody, except your puppets, that read posts here. Are going to ‘fall’ for your ‘inference’ that, that was recently written ? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by Eegore on 08/08/18 at 06:50:40 Is he trying to infer that it was written recently or was he trying to indicate that Pence wrote that? The question I get out of it is if those standards existed in the 90's, why don't they exist today? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/08/18 at 07:24:30 2E0D3013110A0D04630 wrote:
No. But I would hope people like you would read it, search on it and see just how hypocritical this administration is. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/08/18 at 07:25:04 1434363E2334510 wrote:
Great question Eegore. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MShipley on 08/08/18 at 08:52:58 When people were "moving someone out" on a MORAL HIGH GROUND, Jesus responded "let he who has never sinned cast the first stone". |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/08/18 at 08:59:35 746A515049555C40390 wrote:
Smart man that Jesus. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/08/18 at 11:44:58 0121232B3621440 wrote:
Infer Or Imply? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by Eegore on 08/08/18 at 14:20:42 "Infer Or Imply?" Infer. I was using the reference in the post previous to mine: "Are going to ‘fall’ for your ‘inference’ that, that was recently written ?" |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/08/18 at 15:25:07 I Infer When I conclude based on what was said. I imply by what I say. Still unclear about your post, But Meh I'll live |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MShipley on 08/08/18 at 16:26:15 564847464B564D50220 wrote:
Smart man that Jesus.[/quote] A little more than a man. :) |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by raydawg on 08/08/18 at 17:02:29 Who's morality? Seems morality is subjective, often changing depending on who is in power. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/08/18 at 17:20:03 27342C31342232550 wrote:
The author of the quote I posted. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by raydawg on 08/08/18 at 21:05:08 4F515E5F524F54493B0 wrote:
The author of the quote I posted.[/quote] And yours? If not, then why post it? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/08/18 at 21:14:34 60736B76736575120 wrote:
The author of the quote I posted.[/quote] And yours? If not, then why post it? [/quote] Well ray, I didn't write the article, this sin't about my morality - I posted it for everyone else to read and get their take on it. This is about the author now changing his morality because now his guy is in office. How many times do I have to post about the massive hypocrisy of this administration? (that's rhetorical) |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by raydawg on 08/08/18 at 21:46:10 Just say you, and the author agree then.... Why can’t you be frank, and truthful, over such a obvious post by you? What are you trying to avoid, accountability? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/09/18 at 21:16:59 40534B56534555320 wrote:
Seriously ray? You're asking me "why can't you be frank?" Did you forget this exchange between you and I? T - Did your original post have a point? If so, I'm curious as to what it was. R - Thanks, I appreciate your interest..... But again, this format seems to be more about personality’s than it is about debate and consensus...... It’s hard enough to dialogue live, this media is next to impossible. T - OK. I'll leave it at that then. There was no point. R - Perfect, thanks. Be "frank"? How can you ask that when pretty much everything you post could be asked that same question? If I have to spell it out, I will. The original statement I posted was from mike pence on Bill Clinton. My point was simple. Does mike pence still hold true to those convictions? (I don't think he does - do you?) That's the point of my point. My morality doesn't enter into it. I'm not the one who wrote it. I'm not professing my morality - pence is. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by Eegore on 08/10/18 at 05:59:50 "Just say you, and the author agree then.... Why can’t you be frank, and truthful, over such a obvious post by you? What are you trying to avoid, accountability?" Why does the quote have to have a direct nexus to the person posting it? If I post a Machiavellian quote on the forum and ask about its morality does that automatically mean I agree with the original author? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/11/18 at 01:43:42 Ask TT. When I was posting proof of CNN lying he pretended that proved I supported CNN. So, there's that. Did I mention He's a troll? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by thumperclone on 08/11/18 at 05:28:24 Did I mention He's a troll?[/quote] look in the mirror you are soliciting a knee jerk reaction btw so am I ;) |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by thumperclone on 08/11/18 at 05:29:37 back on topic: the quote applies to our current potus clown |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/11/18 at 06:32:21 677B667E637661707F7C7D76130 wrote:
look in the mirror you are soliciting a knee jerk reaction btw so am I ;) [/quote] No, I'm EXPLAINING what someone did and why he's a troll. You don't want to admit it, because he's on your team. Reprehensible behavior Followed by We need rules.. Yeah, right And, I answered the question. It's an accurate and appropriate response |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/11/18 at 06:52:06 534C4A4D50576656665E4C400B390 wrote:
look in the mirror you are soliciting a knee jerk reaction btw so am I ;) [/quote] No, I'm EXPLAINING what someone did and why he's a troll. You don't want to admit it, because he's on your team. Reprehensible behavior Followed by We need rules.. Yeah, right And, I answered the question. It's an accurate and appropriate response[/quote] So, Thumper's post is both calling you out and a little self depreciating. He knows exactly what this is about. Yet instead of agreeing with him, you must respond to keep pointing fingers at others. Here's a little advice - its not everyone else's fault. Take Thumper's advice - look in the mirror. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by thumperclone on 08/11/18 at 07:07:34 he can not his own faults are magnified in others when he is shown his errors he will always change topic been doing it for 12+ years now ::) |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/11/18 at 17:32:45 Watching lefties surround and protect TT is no shock. He's never even apologized. Funny how much he has changed, tho.. Not in character, but in technique. He's literally, actually, a troll. My Opinion. Ymmv |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/11/18 at 18:02:49 627D7B7C61665767576F7D713A080 wrote:
You're obviously entitled to your opinion. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/13/18 at 08:25:35 5E404F4E435E45582A0 wrote:
Interesting you say that. So when Sarah Jeong says: “Dumbass fuc king white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants,” and “Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins.” And Yahooooooooo says: "...But what the conversation has largely failed to take into account is the fact that the situation was precipitated by an alt-right ..." https://www.yahoo.com/news/racist-york-times-reporter-alt-224200065.html So it must mean that you believe that Sarah Jeong is a D.F.I. and responsible for what she says. And you must believe, Yahooooooooooo, 'news', is a D.F.I., for Blaming someone else, and making up all sorts of excuses for her ? Right ? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/13/18 at 08:44:10 2E0D3013110A0D04630 wrote:
Interesting you say that. So when Sarah Jeong says: “Dumbass fuc king white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants,” and “Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins.” And Yahooooooooo says: "...But what the conversation has largely failed to take into account is the fact that the situation was precipitated by an alt-right ..." https://www.yahoo.com/news/racist-york-times-reporter-alt-224200065.html Actually, that was not a Yahoo story. It was from Inverse. Yahoo only posted it. So it must mean that you believe that Sarah Jeong is a D.F.I. and responsible for what she says. Yeah, Sarah was an idiot to post what she did. And you must believe, Yahooooooooooo, 'news', is a D.F.I., for Blaming someone else, and making up all sorts of excuses for her ? Well, as I said, Yahoo didn't report the story, Inverse did. So, no, I don't believe that Yahoo is a DFI (which I am assuming stands for dumb f-ing idiot?) Right ? Wrong [/quote] |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by Serowbot on 08/13/18 at 11:02:32 We're doing a lot of arguing about arguing lately... ::) |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/13/18 at 12:04:11 Yeah, Sarah was an idiot to post what she did. Yeah, Sarah was a racist to post what she did. There, FIFY |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by Serowbot on 08/13/18 at 14:47:55 I just can't keep up with interweb acronyms... :-[ |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/13/18 at 17:49:52 Y Definition / FIFY Means: The definition of FIFY is "Fixed It For You" The Meaning of FIFY |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/13/18 at 21:31:58 405F595E43447545754D5F53182A0 wrote:
Well jog - she used your excuse. She was ticked off by some right wing haters. She regrets her comment just like you did I'm sure..... How about that? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/13/18 at 23:01:36 Comment? She's got bunches of them. You can't accept what I have exposed about you. Keep deflecting and pretending. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/14/18 at 20:37:29 435C5A5D40477646764E5C501B290 wrote:
You talk about me deflecting? You're the one who made a racist comment and then tried to blame it on everyone else but yourself... even though you made it. As I've said over and over on here - all someone has to do is look at the posting history to see who is who on here... You've done nothing but show us who you are. Thanks. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/14/18 at 20:56:22 You weren't being a jakass? I explained what I Did. You haven't. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/14/18 at 21:13:37 I admitted I said it. I also said that in a moment of anger. I wanted to piss you off. She's a racist pregnant dog. Get over it. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by verslagen1 on 08/15/18 at 07:16:16 Do you think donny has auto correct on his twitter account? She's a dog? really? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by Serowbot on 08/15/18 at 07:43:03 Trump hires only the best dogs.... ::) |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/15/18 at 09:23:42 6A757374696E5F6F5F67757932000 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/15/18 at 09:24:51 746B6D6A7770417141796B672C1E0 wrote:
I am over it. Go ahead call her a racist. You're the one that keeps bringing it up... |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/15/18 at 10:03:57 Waiting for the lefties to admit it. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/15/18 at 10:17:07 726D6B6C71764777477F6D612A180 wrote:
Why? Admit what, that this girl, years ago, posted some racial nonsense? OK, I admit it - she did. Happy? How about you and the conservatives? Anything to say about the nazi (running as a republican) for office in Illinois? Anything to say about the the increase in white nationalists (also running as republicans) suddenly running for public office? Yeah, this girl you mention posted racist things. She does not represent the entire democratic party. if you believe that, then you must also believe that the kkk represents the entire republican party. You don't, do you? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/15/18 at 11:45:00 Not the point. She's a racist And Is being embraced by people who Pretend to be in strong opposition to racist people. Just wanted to see her rightfully defined. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/15/18 at 11:57:10 534C4A4D50576656665E4C400B390 wrote:
Not by me. And as far as I can see, there aren't too many people on this forum that support what she said. They may have forgiven her (because she did issue an apology). But in this same vein, why have you not commented on the nazi that's running as a republican in Illinois? Using your prose - We'd like to see him rightfully defined. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by Serowbot on 08/15/18 at 12:46:37 Trump is a huge name caller.... He calls a lot of people stupid... ... but, it was recently calculated that 73% of the people he has called stupid are black... Blacks are 12% of the population... Go figure... :-? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/15/18 at 14:49:26 He's rude to whomever he is responding to that has said something he feels deserves a good slap. If he's rude to a statistically smaller segment of society at a rate that is not representative to their percentage of the population, so what? If that's who is lipping off, that's who gets talked smack to. Have you seen the prison population? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/15/18 at 14:57:27 5A454344595E6F5F6F57454902300 wrote:
No, but hopefully our president will . ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/15/18 at 15:09:50 Trump has called the following people dogs on Twitter: Glen Beck; Ted Cruz; David Gregory; Steve Bannon, Chuck Todd; George Will; Bill Maher and "Rev" Wright. When the discussion of fake news comes up, this is a classic case. It's false that Trump used dog as a racist term. It's just flat out false. But it will be hinted at in some 'newscast' and spoken as absolute fact in others. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/15/18 at 15:12:11 625057464150477854475E350 wrote:
Pointing out that trump acts like a petulant child isn't really helping your case of defending him any... |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/15/18 at 17:52:04 I’m not defending him, I’m pointing out calling him racist for calling her a dog is not correct. The same papers printing an editorial tomorrow about fake news are proving they are in fact publishing fake news. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/15/18 at 21:31:40 7D4F48595E4F58674B58412A0 wrote:
The jury is still out on our president being a racist. I think omarosa might have real dirt on this. I guess we'll see. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/16/18 at 04:43:40 That "jury" has been out for an awful long time now on a lot of topics, none of which have been found so maybe its time to stop wishing for something that's not there. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/16/18 at 05:54:41 497B7C6D6A7B6C537F6C751E0 wrote:
It's not a wish, it's a fact. All you have to do is look at his twitter feed. This is what's on public display - one can only imagine what he says in private. Now it looks like omarosa (and mark burnett) might have proof of his racism. (as far as the "jury" - they had hillary on trial for 4 years on Benghazi, so...) |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/16/18 at 06:13:27 It's not a wish, it's a fact. All you have to do is look at his twitter feed. This is what's on public display - one can only imagine what he says in private. Now it looks like omarosa (and mark burnett) might have proof of his racism. Nothing on his twitter feed indicates he's racist. Racist is a serious charge with a very specific meaning that SHOULD require actual proof, not just disliking someone. Calling someone a dog who happens to be black when you've called dozens of people dogs who are white is not proof of racism. Again "looks like" and actually having are two different things. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/16/18 at 07:48:11 506265747362754A66756C070 wrote:
There's plenty of fuel for the fire: "Sleepy eyes" Chuck Todd? "fine people on both sides"? "These aren’t people. These are animals."? "Now this judge is of Mexican heritage, I'm building a wall."? "bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists."? And let's not forget the entire birther movement. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/16/18 at 08:03:07 Again, none of that is proof of racism. (Chuck Todd?) Labeling someone a racist should be a serious thing that requires serious evidence. By your standards, given what Bill Clinton said about Obama when Hilary was running against him, you should label him a racist. And by default, since Hilary didn't disagree with his comments or leave him, you should label her a racist too. Since you did not support Carson's presidential run, I could label you a racist. How far would I have to look to read a negative comment of yours about Clarence Thomas? A racist has a specific meaning and watering it down for political gain doesn't help. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/16/18 at 09:42:59 083A3D2C2B3A2D123E2D345F0 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/16/18 at 11:03:38 Racist Trump just tweeted touching comments about passing of The Queen of Soul. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/16/18 at 11:39:37 417374656273645B77647D160 wrote:
OK, fair enough. But by your logic, if one tweet doesn't make him a racist, then one tweet doesn't exonerate him either. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by Serowbot on 08/16/18 at 12:45:39 477572636475625D71627B100 wrote:
Who wrote it for him?... |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/16/18 at 13:29:22 554B444548554E53210 wrote:
Wait, let’s get this straight. Because, you, were commenting on a position or ability to do a job, those comments were NOT, ‘racist’, BECAUSE, of skin color ! “… the reason I think he was a bad candidate is because of his incompetence, not his color…” So then WHY, when ANYONE commenting on ANYTHING, the, ‘wanna be king’, did, The ‘Obama’ crowd said only ONE thing: ‘Your Racist’! “…When Clinton said “he’d be getting us coffee”, he was referring to his inexperience, not his race …” If you, REALLY, believe that, contact Lost for some Ocean Front Lots on the North Texas Boarder. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/16/18 at 13:38:01 10330E2D2F34333A5D0 wrote:
Wait, let’s get this straight. Because, you, were commenting on a position or ability to do a job, those comments were NOT, ‘racist’, BECAUSE, of skin color ! That statement doesn't make sense. But to clarify, my opinion did not take carson's skin color into consideration. “… the reason I think he was a bad candidate is because of his incompetence, not his color…” So then WHY, when ANYONE commenting on ANYTHING, the, ‘wanna be king’, did, The ‘Obama’ crowd said only ONE thing: ‘Your Racist’! That's your opinion. You're entitled to it. But that's not the way it was. You're saying "anyone" and "anything". Not true. Not even close. “…When Clinton said “he’d be getting us coffee”, he was referring to his inexperience, not his race …” If you, REALLY, believe that, contact Lost for some Ocean Front Lots on the North Texas Boarder. Yes, I really believe that. Laugh all you want. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D [/quote] |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/17/18 at 05:40:56 When Clinton said "he'd be getting us coffee", he was referring to his inexperience, not his race. Still, Clinton could have chose different words. And also still - not as bad as what our sitting president has said on a public forum. That is perhaps the biggest crock of manufactured BS seen on the TT in a while. That's not at all the truth. Everyone knows what he said and what he meant. Insisting Trump is a racist on the order of real, genuine racist waters the definition down and makes progress impossible. This is why we're stuck in this logjam of race issues. Race hustling is a major strategy of the Democratic party and now that Trump is busting that monopoly, you're doubling down to try and hang on. I just read his positive numbers with African Americans has doubled from 19 to 38%. If a fraction of the African American population woke up to the crap they've been sold, the Democratic party would have to tear itself down and rebuild. Maybe this will be another great accomplishment by Trump. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/17/18 at 06:03:52 427077666170675874677E150 wrote:
"Another"? There were others? As for those numbers - just like you have done - I hold them in suspicion. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/17/18 at 10:14:43 That is perhaps the biggest crock of manufactured BS seen on the TT in a while. That's not at all the truth. Everyone knows what he said and what he meant. Yeah, that Obama was too inexperienced to be a "serious" candidate. But here you go again accusing someone of lying with zero proof, just to make yourself feel better. It’s not my fault you are who you are. No one believes they were talking about Obama’s inexperience, everyone knew they were essentially calling him “boy”. That was the default position for Southern Democrats when Clinton was groomed for politics. They’ve changed to a degree but African Americans are foolish for blindly handing over support to national Democratic politicians year after year. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/17/18 at 13:07:52 6F5D5A4B4C5D4A75594A53380 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/17/18 at 15:55:52 3F212E2F223F24394B0 wrote:
Seeing as how you also believe that filling up your Elect Car, none of the elect was ever produced by, (gasp) coal. Then it is clear that you must also believe, that when Clinton, got a Blow Job, It is not SEX. Wondering, do you believe JFK was F ucking MM ? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/17/18 at 16:50:21 41625F7C7E65626B0C0 wrote:
Seeing as how you also believe that filling up your Elect Car, none of the elect was ever produced by, (gasp) coal. Nope, I never said that mn. Please stop putting words in my mouth. Then it is clear that you must also believe, that when Clinton, got a Blow Job, It is not SEX. Nope, I don't believe that either. (but for the record, our current orange menace has done much worse) Wondering, do you believe JFK was F ucking MM ? I'm sure he was. Good for him! [/quote] |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by raydawg on 08/17/18 at 17:30:27 http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/17/rahm-emanuel-under-increasing-fire-for-linking-chicago-violence-and-morals-in-minority-neighborhoods.html |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/17/18 at 19:04:57 11021A07021404630 wrote:
Yeah, how about that ray? A Jewish mayor in Chicago believes in God and family! That must crush you conservatives to admit that. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/18/18 at 04:41:00 4E5D45585D4B5B3C0 wrote:
There's a melted snowball in Hell this morning...... Rahm told the truth so now he's screwed. Pointing out what anyone who watches LivePD already knows is the end of Rahm. It's Saturday morning at 6:30 when I write this, how many were shot in Chicago last night? Why were they shot? What were the circumstances? Now, big question. WHY were they shot?Try to answe that honestly. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/18/18 at 07:12:43 003235242332251A36253C570 wrote:
There's a melted snowball in Hell this morning...... Rahm told the truth so now he's screwed. Pointing out what anyone who watches LivePD already knows is the end of Rahm. It's Saturday morning at 6:30 when I write this, how many were shot in Chicago last night? Why were they shot? What were the circumstances? Now, big question. WHY were they shot?Try to answe that honestly.[/quote] Not sure why you're so worried about Chicago - You have a better chance of getting shot in your own little town of St.Lous. Chicago is safer than St. Louis. How about that? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/18/18 at 11:22:21 In a answer to the question: 'Wondering, do you believe JFK was F ucking MM ?' 647A757479647F62100 wrote:
WOW, call CNN/NYT/PBS/Etc. T&T Believes in Conspiracy Theories ! How does that, “Tin Foil Hat”, fit ? Is yours custom made, not just folded out on the kitchen table ? Do you buy your tin foil in bulk ? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/18/18 at 12:22:45 6D4E735052494E47200 wrote:
WOW, call CNN/NYT/PBS/Etc. T&T Believes in Conspiracy Theories ! How does that, “Tin Foil Hat”, fit ? Is yours custom made, not just folded out on the kitchen table ? Do you buy your tin foil in bulk ? [/quote] Well, first off, there's no such thing as tin foil. It's aluminum foil. Also, sorry mn, it's not really a conspiracy theory. You don't think Kennedy was having an affair with Marilyn? Well, you're free to believe whatever you'd like to... |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/18/18 at 15:17:14 160807060B160D10620 wrote:
The spin goes on, the spin goes on Drums keep pounding a rhythm to the brain La de da de de, la de da de da |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/18/18 at 16:01:25 74576A494B50575E390 wrote:
The spin goes on, the spin goes on Drums keep pounding a rhythm to the brain La de da de de, la de da de da [/quote] Sonny and Cher sing it better. But nice try. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/18/18 at 17:33:13 Remember. He called me a liar. I was wrong in my recollection of which places changed their ways of dealing with dead wood and underbrush. Jakkass. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/18/18 at 18:05:26 4E5157504D4A7B4B7B43515D16240 wrote:
Well, because you lied. You fabricated a statement out of thin air with no proof. What you should have done is just let it be and not mention it. But it seems that it bothers you quite a bit when you get caught in a lie. You continue to make excuses to try an save face. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/18/18 at 22:15:38 No, you twisted jakkass, I was WRONG. But you keep pretending. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by WebsterMark on 08/19/18 at 04:45:08 495758595449524F3D0 wrote:
There's a melted snowball in Hell this morning...... Rahm told the truth so now he's screwed. Pointing out what anyone who watches LivePD already knows is the end of Rahm. It's Saturday morning at 6:30 when I write this, how many were shot in Chicago last night? Why were they shot? What were the circumstances? Now, big question. WHY were they shot?Try to answe that honestly.[/quote] Not sure why you're so worried about Chicago - You have a better chance of getting shot in your own little town of St.Lous. Chicago is safer than St. Louis. How about that?[/quote] You take everything personally and are hyper-paranoid about being labeled a liar. My point was good for Rahm for pointing out the obvious which means he's toast now. Yes, St Louis, like Chicago, LA, Baltimore etc are plagued with areas that are sh!tholes. The moral high ground in these ares is a tiny little rise in the bottom of a pit. I have no idea how we get these people out of that pit. Seriously watch PDLive one night. What the F is wrong with these people? How did they descend to such depths? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/19/18 at 06:30:23 6C7375726F6859695961737F34060 wrote:
No, you weren't wrong, you lied. You presented it like it was fact, with no proof. Anyone that can read can see that. Nice name calling by the way. How is it that "T&T ruined this forum"again? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/19/18 at 06:35:03 487A7D6C6B7A6D527E6D741F0 wrote:
Well, making blanket statements about cities doesn't help. It gives the perception that "all is lost". How about praising those "rises in the pit" instead of tearing down the entire city? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/19/18 at 09:23:07 5C424D4C415C475A280 wrote:
No, you weren't wrong, you lied. You presented it like it was fact, with no proof. Anyone that can read can see that. Nice name calling by the way. How is it that "T&T ruined this forum"again?[/quote] Let me count the ways |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/19/18 at 11:33:02 706F696E73744575457D6F63281A0 wrote:
No, you weren't wrong, you lied. You presented it like it was fact, with no proof. Anyone that can read can see that. Nice name calling by the way. How is it that "T&T ruined this forum"again?[/quote] Let me count the ways [/quote] No need to count jog - just look at you own posts... all 44,800 of them. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/19/18 at 12:23:36 4C525D5C514C574A380 wrote:
That is clearly implying that I am singing that song. I am not singing it. PROVE to me that I said that ! I never said I was singing it. PROVE to me that I said that ! I never said I sing better that Sonny & Cher. PROVE to me that I said that ! You are LYING when you imply, that I said, I sing better than, Sonny & Cher. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/19/18 at 12:50:52 5A794467657E7970170 wrote:
That is clearly implying that I am singing that song. I am not singing it. PROVE to me that I said that ! I never said I was singing it. PROVE to me that I said that ! I never said I sing better that Sonny & Cher. PROVE to me that I said that ! You are LYING when you imply, that I said, I sing better than, Sonny & Cher. [/quote] Wow, you're just as witty as ray too! Good job mn! |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/20/18 at 08:45:02 667877767B667D60120 wrote:
So what you call: “…Sonny and Cher sing it better. But nice try….” When you are clearly implying, I said I/ believe, I sing better than, Sonny & Cher. ? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/20/18 at 08:49:41 2D0E331012090E07600 wrote:
So what you call: “…Sonny and Cher sing it better. But nice try….” When you are clearly implying, I said I/ believe, I sing better than, Sonny & Cher. ? [/quote] I don't know what you're trying to say. It makes no difference. You just want to drag this out for nothing. I say no. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/20/18 at 16:24:33 On one side of your mouth you say: 7C626D6C617C677A080 wrote:
Then the Other side of your mouth you say: "...I say no..." When you respond to a post, can you announce, which side of your mouth you are responding from? The, 'Inept' side, or the, 'Lying', side ? |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by Serowbot on 08/20/18 at 16:57:53 This is the Tall Table?... Really?.... Did somebody cut the legs off the chairs?... :-/ |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/20/18 at 17:40:38 12310C2F2D3631385F0 wrote:
Then the Other side of your mouth you say: "...I say no..." When you respond to a post, can you announce, which side of your mouth you are responding from? The, 'Inept' side, or the, 'Lying', side ? [/quote] Try and carry on a conversation please? Otherwise, stop wasting our time. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by MnSpring on 08/20/18 at 17:59:03 LOL And the Spin goes On, and the Spin goes ON ! |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/20/18 at 18:01:52 2F0C3112100B0C05620 wrote:
So, that's a no? OK. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/20/18 at 19:46:07 I thought TT left. I would have sworn the Muppet chided us for making him leave. Never helps out on the board. Just screws up whatever is here. I can do that. |
|
Title: Re: The Moral High Ground Post by T And T Garage on 08/20/18 at 19:52:11 4B545255484F7E4E7E46545813210 wrote:
|
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |