|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Yeah, that's not racist.. /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1533860091 Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 08/09/18 at 17:14:51 |
|
Title: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/09/18 at 17:14:51 http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=58817 New York Times' newest editorial board member Sarah Jeong is not a fan of "dumbass f**king white people" sharing their opinions on the internet and she wants the whole world to know it. The Times announced on Wednesday they were hiring Sarah Jeong to join their editorial board: Sarah Jeong is joining The New York Times editorial board. ... [Jeong] will join us in September as our lead writer on technology. ... Born in South Korea, Sarah grew up in North Carolina and California. She's both a journalist and a lawyer. She's both a journalist and a lawyer. She's a journalist,a lawyer and a racist. There, fixed it for you. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by eau de sauvage on 08/09/18 at 17:39:57 @Jog, Is this supposed to somehow mitigate your racist rants? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/09/18 at 17:44:20 I got pissed off at some people and Exactly one time said something I regret. Otherwise Show me. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by T And T Garage on 08/09/18 at 21:18:39 233C3A3D20271626162E3C307B490 wrote:
All it takes is one time to show everyone who you are. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/09/18 at 22:03:14 You sure proved what you are. And you worked at it for three days. I was being jerked around and got mad. Said it and regretted it. I want to see what this newby Eau has to say. Let him back up that claim. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by eau de sauvage on 08/09/18 at 22:41:50 081711160B0C3D0D3D05171B50620 wrote:
Maybe you missed it, I said "@Jog, Is this supposed to somehow mitigate your racist rants?" If you'd would give me a specific question then I'm happy to answer. BTW what is 'newby' supposed to imply? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/09/18 at 22:54:46 Posts: 796 Newby Sure, explain why you think I'm such a racist. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by eau de sauvage on 08/10/18 at 03:23:19 736C6A6D70774676467E6C602B190 wrote:
1. No I didn't ask what a 'newby' was, I asked you what is the point of mentioning it, what are you implying? 2. Maybe you are not a racist maybe you just act like one, I can't see into your mind I can only formulate ideas based on how you present yourself. 3. What is your take on Trump's attacks of the black athletes 'taking a knee' during the national anthem. Do you think Trump is right to insist this is stopped, and if so why. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by T And T Garage on 08/10/18 at 05:07:34 647B7D7A6760516151697B773C0E0 wrote:
The difference is that I'm proud of myself. I'm not ashamed. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/10/18 at 08:04:43 4B594D4E595F5D380 wrote:
1. No I didn't ask what a 'newby' was, I asked you what is the point of mentioning it, what are you implying? You don't have the history here that I do, so what are you pointing at that I'm guilty of? 2. Maybe you are not a racist maybe you just act like one, I can't see into your mind I can only formulate ideas based on how you present yourself. 3. What is your take on Trump's attacks of the black athletes 'taking a knee' during the national anthem. Do you think Trump is right to insist this is stopped, and if so why. [/quote] You mentioned racist rants. I'm waiting. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by MShipley on 08/10/18 at 11:40:00 WOW eau, one of the things you complained about was people changing the subject but I guess that only counts when others change the subject. This thread was not about JOG it is about Sarah Jeong and the New York Times hypocrisy because we all know that if a conservative said something like this they would be calling for them to be fired. Ohhh, but it is white people so they don't count. "What is your take on Trump's attacks of black athletes 'taking a knee' during the national anthem. Do you think it is right for Trump to insist this is stopped, and if so why." The fact that you see this as Trump attacking black people shows your racist bias. Trump is against all (no matter what color) from taking a knee and quite frankly so am I. I think it is an insult to the country and the people who have given them the life they have. Should Trump insist it stop. Maybe not, but he has a right to his opinion. On the other side, these organizations are privately owned. These people represent the organization. They do have the freedom to take a knee if they wish but the owner also has the right to fire them or not rehire them. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by MnSpring on 08/10/18 at 14:07:45 Just wonder if a, White, Male, of Anglo decent/heritage, would have said the words: ”dumbass fuc king black people”, marking up the internet, with their opinions like dogs, pizzing on fire hydrants” “oh man it's kind of sick, how much joy I get out of being curl to young gay people”. What kind of response would their be, from the, ’80%’, media ? http://www.informationliberation.com/files/new-york-times-editor-sarah-jeong-11.jpg |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by MnSpring on 08/10/18 at 14:23:03 7A646B6A677A617C0E0 wrote:
Let’s see, Sure does look like you just stated, You are PROUD, to be a Troll ! |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by T And T Garage on 08/10/18 at 14:27:47 1734092A2833343D5A0 wrote:
Let’s see, Sure does look like you just stated, You are PROUD, to be a Troll ! [/quote] You're the one calling me a troll, not me. I don't consider myself a troll. In fact, that's one of the things I'm proud of. But I wonder, if someone calls someone else an idiot - how would that work. Would that person be "proud to be an idiot"? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by MnSpring on 08/10/18 at 14:39:41 6C727D7C716C776A180 wrote:
Do you want to make a comment on post # 11 ? Or, do you just wish to call me a, ‘idiot’, (among the numerous other slanderous racist names you have called me already) simply because I disagree with you ? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by MnSpring on 08/10/18 at 16:43:50 Just wonder if a, White, Male, of Anglo decent/heritage, would have said the words: ”dumbass fuc king black people”, marking up the internet, with their opinions like dogs, pizzing on fire hydrants” “oh man it's kind of sick, how much joy I get out of being cruel to young gay people”. What kind of response would their be, from the, ’80%’, media ? http://www.informationliberation.com/files/new-york-times-editor-sarah-jeong-11.jpg |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by eau de sauvage on 08/10/18 at 18:57:45 6C724948514D4458210 wrote:
That was meant to catch JoG but I see you have taken the bait and toppled in head first. Your comments are both wrong in fact and wrong in law. You have branded yourself as a racist with your acquiescing to how Trump decided to spin it. Reminds me of Kellyanne Conway bringing up the 'bowling green massacre' to justify the muslim ban. The dark undercurrent of racism that America was built on is not such an undercurrent after all, as Trump's ascent to the top has shown. He used every dog whistle possible. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by T And T Garage on 08/11/18 at 06:21:54 7B586546445F5851360 wrote:
Do you want to make a comment on post # 11 ? What comment could I make? She made totally racist comments. However, she does not speak for all liberals. If you think she does, then you must also think that the kkk speaks for all conservatives. Or, do you just wish to call me a, ‘idiot’, (among the numerous other slanderous racist names you have called me already) simply because I disagree with you ? [/quote] I don't want to call you and idiot. I don't name call anymore. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by MnSpring on 08/11/18 at 07:37:19 2A343B3A372A312C5E0 wrote:
“…What comment could I make? She made totally racist comments. However, she does not speak for all liberals. If you think she does, then you must also think that the kkk speaks for all conservatives…” Such a Fantastic Grasp of the Utter Obvious ! That answer would be Troll 101, "...do not answer the question, but ‘spin’ it to what you think will benefit you..." Just checked your favored, Yahoo ’News’. This is what they said: "The issue at hand was the political correctness, or lack thereof, of Jeong’s tweets, which openly mocked white people. (Here is the FIRST, ’not her fault’) But what the conversation has largely failed to take into account is the fact that the situation was precipitated by an alt-right trolling campaign that has target other liberal-leaning media and entertainment figures who have come under fire recently for past social media offenses. (And the second) And that in itself is more worrisome than any series of tweets” And just in the, yahoo story, their are SO MANY other, EXCUSES. Please explain, how her behavior, (Not the first time for her, and probably won’t be the last), is the ‘alt-rights’ fault ? As one of you favorite, ’news’, sights says. Why is that story, NOT on 80% + of the broadcast media, like the Charlottesville episode was ? “…I don’t name call anymore…” Good, so from now on, if someone does not agree with you, you will not call them, Stupid, Idiot, Moran, Crazy, Bat $hit Crazy, … |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by T And T Garage on 08/11/18 at 14:51:39 7655684B4952555C3B0 wrote:
“…What comment could I make? She made totally racist comments. However, she does not speak for all liberals. If you think she does, then you must also think that the kkk speaks for all conservatives…” Such a Fantastic Grasp of the Utter Obvious ! That answer would be Troll 101, "...do not answer the question, but ‘spin’ it to what you think will benefit you..." No, it doesn't benefit me, I'm just stating the fact that this woman does not represent all liberals. That's all there is to it. If you don't agree with that, then you must agree that the kkk represents all conservatives. Just checked your favored, Yahoo ’News’. This is what they said: "The issue at hand was the political correctness, or lack thereof, of Jeong’s tweets, which openly mocked white people. (Here is the FIRST, ’not her fault’) But what the conversation has largely failed to take into account is the fact that the situation was precipitated by an alt-right trolling campaign that has target other liberal-leaning media and entertainment figures who have come under fire recently for past social media offenses. (And the second) And that in itself is more worrisome than any series of tweets” And just in the, yahoo story, their are SO MANY other, EXCUSES. Please explain, how her behavior, (Not the first time for her, and probably won’t be the last), is the ‘alt-rights’ fault ? As one of you favorite, ’news’, sights says. First off, it's not up to me to explain or defend her behavior. Second, are you certain it was Yahoo? Are you sure it wasn't a posted story from another outlet? Please provide a link. Why is that story, NOT on 80% + of the broadcast media, like the Charlottesville episode was ? Good question. “…I don’t name call anymore…” Good, so from now on, if someone does not agree with you, you will not call them, Stupid, Idiot, Moran, Crazy, Bat $hit Crazy, … [/quote] I will continue to name call our idiot president and his idiot supporters in public office. But I will do my best to refrain from that on here to other posters. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/11/18 at 17:14:33 The last known kkk member was Hillary's mentor. This idiot broad has been voted for. Thankfully, everyone she endorsed lost. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by T And T Garage on 08/11/18 at 18:06:47 5D4244435E5968586850424E05370 wrote:
And...? How do you feel about a nazi running in IL on the republican ticket? People will vote for him. What's that say? Are all conservatives nazis? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/13/18 at 17:57:13 41534744535557320 wrote:
That was meant to catch JoG but I see you have taken the bait and toppled in head first. Your comments are both wrong in fact and wrong in law. You have branded yourself as a racist with your acquiescing to how Trump decided to spin it. Reminds me of Kellyanne Conway bringing up the 'bowling green massacre' to justify the muslim ban. The dark undercurrent of racism that America was built on is not such an undercurrent after all, as Trump's ascent to the top has shown. He used every dog whistle possible. [/quote] Nobody has the right to tell someone what political statement to make. Trump is wrong on this. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by LostArtist on 08/14/18 at 10:01:48 77686E6974734272427A68642F1D0 wrote:
That was meant to catch JoG but I see you have taken the bait and toppled in head first. Your comments are both wrong in fact and wrong in law. You have branded yourself as a racist with your acquiescing to how Trump decided to spin it. Reminds me of Kellyanne Conway bringing up the 'bowling green massacre' to justify the muslim ban. The dark undercurrent of racism that America was built on is not such an undercurrent after all, as Trump's ascent to the top has shown. He used every dog whistle possible. [/quote] Nobody has the right to tell someone what political statement to make. Trump is wrong on this. [/quote] --- huh, something we agree on... check that out! |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/14/18 at 11:10:58 It's about the hundredth time I've said it. If it's making a political statement to kneel, then Not kneeling is also a statement. I've held and stated that belief from the start of this uproar. Sad that I have to type the same stuff Over and Frikken over. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by LostArtist on 08/14/18 at 11:47:36 6F7076716C6B5A6A5A62707C37050 wrote:
sadder that you feel the need to lash out about it, I probably agreed with you back then about it too, probably even said so... so just relax |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/14/18 at 12:38:03 Waiting for Eau to read it.. Time to stop letting ONE FUKKING ANGRY OUTBURST to define me. And defend the repeat offender. Wow |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by faffi on 08/14/18 at 14:16:19 What is it with these weird comma placements, strange sentence splits and use of parentheses ad nausea combined with several fonts that seems to be the trend among some of the members? Is it supposed to make things more clear, confusing or just a lack of writing skills? JOG2 writes short enough messages that I can be bothered to read and try and decipher, but a couple of others I simply ignore because my brain hurt just attempting to make sense out of it. Or perhaps it's just because I'm a bloody foreigner :-/ Why punctuation can be important (OK, maybe not splendid English, but you get the geist of it) : a) Kill him not, wait for me. b) Kill him, not wait for me. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by Eegore on 08/15/18 at 05:46:05 It seems to be specific to this forum. When I read them its not uncommon for me to copy/paste to notebook so the font sizes and colors just revert to normal text as its easier to read. I don't know if its intentional by the posters to get people to not read the whole message but a few people have stated they have just stopped reading the multicolor and multi-font sized long posts. They are harder to read. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/15/18 at 09:32:37 few people have stated they have just stopped reading the multicolor and m Haven't seen that. This isn't eighth grade English. I don't follow the rules. I spell it like it sounds sometimes. Capitalize for emphasis, If a post is confusing Say so. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by eau de sauvage on 08/20/18 at 17:42:09 Finally I see what prompted this thread, it was an alt right racist meme... Here's the full context... https://www.vox.com/2018/8/3/17644704/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-tweets-backlash-racism In tweets like the one embedded above, Jeong appeared to be commenting on the idea that white people often believe they are being discriminated against when they aren’t. To equate “being mean to white people” with the actual systemic oppression and marginalization of minority groups is a false equivalency. But Jeong’s detractors removed this type of context, and began to circulate her old tweets in curated roundups that quickly went viral: Meet the newest member of the New York Times editorial board. I'd say that these tweets were part of her resumè when she applied for the job. pic.twitter.com/CLgFvPeAgM — Garbage Human (@GarbageHuman_) August 2, 2018 The screencapped tweets painted a picture of Jeong sarcastically engaging in the same hyperbolic ranting rhetoric employed by alt-right internet groups like Gamergate. As members of those movements have done countless times before, Jeong’s detractors organized to deploy a system of performative outrage, using the screencaps as “evidence” that Jeong was racist and launching a torrent of violent, racist, and misogynistic speech at both Jeong and the New York Times to voice its displeasure. The screencapped tweets also circulated among fringe alt-right sites like the Daily Caller and Gateway Pundit. The cries of racism against Jeong then drew supporters in the mainstream — including writer Andrew Sullivan, who published a widely derided opinion piece that characterized Jeong’s comments as promoting “eliminationist rhetoric” and portraying white people as “subhuman.” On Thursday morning, Jeong issued a statement. As a female journalist on the internet as well as a woman of color, she is no stranger to harassment — as she herself noted before explaining that in the tweets being circulated as proof of her supposed “racism,” she had been engaging “in what I thought of at the time as counter-trolling.” |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by eau de sauvage on 08/20/18 at 17:43:03 42504447505654310 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/20/18 at 17:55:59 Bullshit |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by MnSpring on 08/20/18 at 17:57:13 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D "And the Spin goes on, and the Spin goes on" ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by eau de sauvage on 08/20/18 at 18:42:30 When all you get is 'bullsh!t' from the barely literate JoG and 'it's spin' from the verging on sociopathic MnSpring, you just know you've hit the raw nerve. Back to your conspiracy theorist, tinfoil hat wearing, neo nazi sites, the both of you. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by T And T Garage on 08/20/18 at 18:47:06 54465251464042270 wrote:
[smiley=tekst-toppie.gif] Before mn says it, I'll tell you that there's no such thing as "tin foil". It's aluminum. But we get your point - well taken Eau! |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by justin_o_guy2 on 08/20/18 at 19:42:53 You're hilarious Eau. Barely literate.. LMAO.. |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by eau de sauvage on 08/21/18 at 02:20:08 It's the naked truth. 342B2D2A3730013101392B276C5E0 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by MnSpring on 08/21/18 at 07:46:43 30223635222426430 wrote:
EAU, did you know, their is no ‘official’ place that says that John F. Kennedy, was having sex with Marlin Monroe ? None, Nada Does Not exist. Their are LOTS of places and statements where people, do believe, they were boinking. But NO, ‘Official’, Government statements. Now A good buddy of yours, who several times has given your posts a thumbs up, DOES BELIEVE, they were Boinking. A Suggestion, perhaps you should re think your statement about, ’Tin Foil Hats’. “…Back to your conspiracy theorist, tinfoil hat wearing, …” |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by Serowbot on 08/21/18 at 08:08:42 It's tinfoil if you put the shiny side out... If you put the dull side out, it don't block the moonbeams it absorbs them. Be warned... :-? |
|
Title: Re: Yeah, that's not racist.. Post by T And T Garage on 08/21/18 at 08:40:57 4751465B43565B40340 wrote:
;D |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |