SuzukiSavage.com /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1534966237 Message started by MnSpring on 08/22/18 at 12:30:37

Title: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by MnSpring on 08/22/18 at 12:30:37 (Just type that in any search engine) Totally Dropped, Disappeared, Forgotten, All the corners rounded off, and it rolled into the weeds. Anybody else,  ANYBODY  else. “If Jane Sanders had been Jane Doe, she never would have gotten the loan,” "Sanders stated that there were $2.6 million in donations coming to the school. Only $676,000 ever came in.” "Sen. Sanders improperly used his elected position to pressure the People’s United Bank to grant the loan” JUST, the first three ! https://wjla.com/news/bottom-line/opinion-investigation-of-alleged-bank-fraud-by-jane-sanders-should-get-more-news-coverage https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/02/11/4-keys-to-understanding-the-investigation-of-a-loan-helping-bernie-sanders-wife/ https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/15/us/politics/bernie-sanders-jane-sanders-investigation-burlington-college.html Goes to show, how the right application, of a ultra-liberal’s nose, to the ‘correct’ Butt, of another Ultra-Liberal. Make things, ‘Just’, Disappear. But of course, Lying, Scamming, and Spinning, is nothing new to the Sanders. "Sen. Bernie Sanders had a surprisingly good financial year in 2016. While the Democratic socialist was warning against the concentration of wealth in the hands of “the top 1 percent,” he was also joining their ranks." "A financial disclosure document filed in May shows that the independent lawmaker from Vermont made more than $1 million in 2017, given him income of that figure or more for the second year in a row, “ "But the senator’s income places him high above the national threshold for qualifying for the so-called "One Percent," the group of super-wealthy individuals that is supposedly knocking U.S. society out of balance.”

Title: Re: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by T And T Garage on 08/22/18 at 12:34:12 So, what was the outcome of the investigation? Was she found guilty of any wrongdoing?

Title: Re: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by MnSpring on 08/22/18 at 12:38:39 796768696479627F0D0 wrote: So, what was the outcome of the investigation? Was she found guilty of any wrongdoing? So you are not comprehending this: "...how the right application, of a ultra-liberal’s nose, to the ‘correct’ Butt, of another Ultra-Liberal. Make things, ‘Just’, Disappear...."

Title: Re: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by T And T Garage on 08/22/18 at 12:40:45 62417C5F5D4641482F0 wrote: [quote author=796768696479627F0D0 link=1534966237/0#1 date=1534966452]So, what was the outcome of the investigation? Was she found guilty of any wrongdoing? So you are not comprehending this: "...how the right application, of a ultra-liberal’s nose, to the ‘correct’ Butt, of another Ultra-Liberal. Make things, ‘Just’, Disappear...." [/quote] If you're saying that it's all some sort of liberal cover up, then why hasn't the right-wing picked it up to make an example of these "terrible liberals"? Let me put it another way - if you're able to see the conspiracy, why hasn't anyone else?

Title: Re: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by Serowbot on 08/22/18 at 12:53:08 Sometimes it's right application of innocent... Pub's rarely have that... Snopes... GOP Lawmaker: Allegations Against Jane Sanders Were ‘Hearsay’ Vermont House Rep. Don Turner confirmed he was the source for allegations by President Donald Trump's state campaign chair. https://www.snopes.com/news/2017/07/07/gop-lawmaker-allegations-sanders/ Quote: MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) -- A Republican lawyer who reported Democratic U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders and his wife to federal officials was passing on information he heard from a GOP lawmaker who says he didn't have direct knowledge of the allegations. The lawyer, Brady Toensing, sent letters to federal officials alleging that Sanders' office pressured a bank to approve a loan to a now-closed college run by the senator's wife. The source of that information was Republican Rep. Don Turner, the minority leader of the Vermont House. Turner says he was relaying what his friends told him, but that his friends didn't have direct knowledge of the negotiations. Toensing, an attorney who served as Donald Trump's Vermont representative during last year's campaign, said Monday he was standing by the allegation. Sanders says the allegations against his wife, Jane, are politically motivated. tRump strikes again... ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by MnSpring on 08/22/18 at 16:03:16 Yep, 'Snoops' is such a seller, stand up, honest place, that would Never, 'pick a side'. And their has Never been, someone, who got paid a great deal of money, to 'say' something ! Most certainly, a person, DID, commit  Suicide, with both hands tied behind his back, and two shots to the head. And of course,  B.S. is  Really, Not, in the 1%. Simply because he says so ! ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D

Title: Re: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by T And T Garage on 08/22/18 at 16:15:11 4764597A7863646D0A0 wrote: Yep, 'Snoops' is such a seller, stand up, honest place, that would Never, 'pick a side'. And their has Never been, someone, who got paid a great deal of money, to 'say' something ! Most certainly, a person, DID, commit  Suicide, with both hands tied behind his back, and two shots to the head. And of course,  B.S. is  Really, Not, in the 1%. Simply because he says so ! He's actually not.  The 1% crowd has wealth in excess of $8.4 million. ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D   ;D   To ask again though - if you're able to see the conspiracy about Jane, why hasn't anyone else?

Title: Re: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by MnSpring on 08/22/18 at 16:34:43 4B555A5B564B504D3F0 wrote:  The 1% crowd has wealth in excess of $8.4 million. Again you are wrong: " Here's how much you have to earn to be in the top 1% in every US state. What exactly does it mean to be among the top one percent of U.S. earners? According to a 2013 Economic Policy Institute report, "to be in the top one percent nationally, a family needs an income of $389,436." "According to statistical data from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the top 1% had an adjusted gross income of $465,626 or higher for the 2014 tax year. The Washington Center for Equitable Growth put the average household income for this group at $1,260,508 for 2014." "In 2010, the number of US households was 117 million so there were 1,170,000 households in the top 1%. But the problem of economic disparity lies not nearly so much with the "one percenters" as with the top one-hundredth of that top percentile, about 30,000 people and 12,000 households." Wait, hasn't B.S. just gone, Nuts, wanting to TAX  the 1% ? BTW, here is a little link for ya, Find someone to read it to ya. https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurengensler/2016/06/16/one-percent-by-state-income-inequality/#45952e6be3ad Never mind the TRUTH, that it really the top, 1% OF THE Top 1%.

Title: Re: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by T And T Garage on 08/22/18 at 16:48:39 0B281536342F2821460 wrote: [quote author=4B555A5B564B504D3F0 link=1534966237/0#6 date=1534979711]  The 1% crowd has wealth in excess of $8.4 million. Again you are wrong: " Here's how much you have to earn to be in the top 1% in every US state. What exactly does it mean to be among the top one percent of U.S. earners? According to a 2013 Economic Policy Institute report, "to be in the top one percent nationally, a family needs an income of $389,436." "According to statistical data from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the top 1% had an adjusted gross income of $465,626 or higher for the 2014 tax year. The Washington Center for Equitable Growth put the average household income for this group at $1,260,508 for 2014." "In 2010, the number of US households was 117 million so there were 1,170,000 households in the top 1%. But the problem of economic disparity lies not nearly so much with the "one percenters" as with the top one-hundredth of that top percentile, about 30,000 people and 12,000 households." Wait, hasn't B.S. just gone, Nuts, wanting to TAX  the 1% ? BTW, here is a little link for ya, Find someone to read it to ya. https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurengensler/2016/06/16/one-percent-by-state-income-inequality/#45952e6be3ad Never mind the TRUTH, that it really the top, 1% OF THE Top 1%. [/quote] I was referring to wealth, not income - and that's exactly what I posted. To be clear mn, there's a difference between income and wealth.

Title: Re: Jane Sanders Bank Fraud. Post by eau de sauvage on 08/22/18 at 20:39:12 @TT, Let me put it another way - if you're able to see the conspiracy, why hasn't anyone else? Mn has a rare gift.

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.