SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Agree with man made. GW and then you get
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1543432336

Message started by justin_o_guy2 on 11/28/18 at 11:12:16

Title: Agree with man made. GW and then you get
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 11/28/18 at 11:12:16

https://www.atr.org/details-horrible-carbon-tax-bill?amp

Keep cheering for it. You won't be able to afford your air conditioning.

Title: Re: Agree with man made. GW and then you get
Post by WebsterMark on 11/28/18 at 12:36:58

Gee.... I don't know why anyone would question scientist.....

How could a government report prepared by hundreds of scientists and with the official imprimatur of the federal government be wrong? The obvious answer is that they have been consistently wrong for decades in predictions of environmental devastation. Anyone over the age of 50 knows that we have heard these sensational, false malthusian forecasts from the federal government, and that reality has contradicted them in almost every instance. Look at history and consider the track record.

In the 1960s, the world became captivated by the likes of media darling and Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich, who warned of a population bomb as humans propagated like field mice. He said people will live elbow to elbow, leading to mass starvation, and there was a 50/50 bet that Britain would survive as a nation. India, we were told, was beyond saving. These false worries became the basis for some terrible population control strategies, like the gruesome one child policy of China.

In the 1970s, the infamous Club of Rome report on “limits to growth” in the world, which was sponsored and funded by the federal government, saw the planet not surviving much past the year 2000 due to poverty, pollution, starvation, overcrowding, climate change, and natural resource depletion. It was all so horrifying that people across the country started wearing lapel pins that said, “Stop the planet, I want to get off.”

In the 1980s, the Carter administration spent millions of dollars on the most comprehensive environmental report ever undertaken by the federal government, employing hundreds of top scientists from more than two dozen agencies. (Sound familiar?) The end product dismally concluded, “If present trends continue, the world in 2000 will be more crowded, more polluted, less stable ecologically, and more vulnerable to disruption than the world we live in now. Serious stresses involving population, resources, and environment are clearly visible ahead. Despite greater output, people will be poorer in many ways than they are today.”

Title: Re: Agree with man made. GW and then you get
Post by verslagen1 on 11/28/18 at 13:51:04

Don't worry, soon those that believe we descended from apes will rise and declare war upon the god fearing.
It will be known as the War for the planet of Apeists.

Title: Re: Agree with man made. GW and then you get
Post by T And T Garage on 11/28/18 at 13:55:00

263522233C3137353E61500 wrote:

Don't worry, soon those that believe we descended from apes will rise and declare war upon the god fearing.
It will be known as the War for the planet of Apeists.

Are you being serious? Do you not believe in evolution?

Title: Re: Agree with man made. GW and then you get
Post by MnSpring on 11/28/18 at 15:17:28

What about that, Ice Age ?

"...On April 28, 1975, Newsweek published a provocative article, “The Cooling World,” in which writer and science editor Peter Gwynne described a significant chilling of the world’s climate, with evidence accumulating “so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it.” He raised the possibility of shorter growing seasons and poor crop yields, famine, and shipping lanes blocked by ice, perhaps to begin as soon as the mid-1980s. Meteorologists, he wrote, were “almost unanimous” in the opinion that our planet was getting colder. Over the years that followed, Gwynne’s article became one of the most-cited stories in Newsweek’s history...."

"...Beginning in 2003, software engineer William Connolley quietly removed the highly inconvenient references to the global cooling scare of the 1970s from Wikipedia, the world’s most influential and accessed informational source.
It had to be done. Too many skeptics were (correctly) pointing out that the scientific “consensus” during the 1960s and 1970s was that the Earth had been cooling for decades, and that nascent theorizing regarding the potential for a CO2-induced global warming were still questionable and uncertain...."

"...When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand. When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions...."

https://youtu.be/1kGB5MMIAVA
[media]https://youtu.be/1kGB5MMIAVA[/media]

Just type in:
"1960 articles about the new Ice Age"

So if someone says, ''the UL's are terribly wrong''
(Just like they were in the 70's)
That means, Everybody, that says that,
Throws Tires in the Ditch.

According to the warmalarmists, and their Parrots.

but, But, BUT, say the UL, Socialistic Progressives.