SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> The Cafe >> Triumph's 400 Thumpers
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1687953030

Message started by ohiomoto on 06/28/23 at 04:50:30

Title: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by ohiomoto on 06/28/23 at 04:50:30

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCts-qNa2FI[/media]

Speed 400
http://https://www.cycleworld.com/resizer/urzzCBk7ac8e7ySI8btuqORWvxg=/1440x0/filters:focal(719x576:729x586)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/octane/OQJ6G54GJBBRHGNKWPFCL2O7W4.jpg

Scrambler 400 X
http://https://www.cycleworld.com/resizer/XrRD4fpPH8CNAUzInW_iU0rrJmM=/1440x0/filters:focal(772x583:782x593)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/octane/VIJZLCZ7BNAU5FIVIJMLRGYZLM.jpg

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by ohiomoto on 06/28/23 at 05:03:17

I actually like these better than the Bonneville T100 which is really the only modern-era Triumph I would consider.   Not as retro but I think the lines are more balanced.

T100
http://https://cdp.azureedge.net/products/USA/TM/2023/MC/CRUISER/BONNEVILLE_T100/50/JET_BLACK/2000000018.jpg

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 06/28/23 at 08:14:29

While pricing has not yet been announced, Triumph says both the 2024 Triumph Speed 400 and Scrambler 400 X will be attractively priced versus the key competitors in each market.  

Dangitt

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Dave on 06/29/23 at 07:37:20

The specs show 39.5 horsepower.

That is great.....I believe 30HP is a minimum to be able to keep up with traffic on the USA highways.

The price is expected to be around $5,000.

https://www.cycleworld.com/motorcycle-news/triumph-speed-400-first-look/

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by J Mac on 06/29/23 at 18:24:23

Cool.  I like that price.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by MMRanch on 06/29/23 at 18:53:20

I think the rest of the story might show up in the torque figures:

Versys 300   = 19.2 ft/lbs/10,000    40   HP.  Over 11,000 rpm
RE 350"J"     = 20   ft/lbs/  4,000     21   HP            6,100
Triumph 400 = 27.7 ft/lbs/ 6,500     39.5 HP           8,000
LS650          = 37    ft/lbs/ 3,400     31   HP            6,500

Seems odd that the one with the highest HP has the lowest torque.

Thump - Thump - Thump ...

Really , I'm thinking ---  that Triumph is going to take a chunk of the market    !
It's got some Torque and Some HP too !!  

https://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/model/triu/triumph-scrambler-400x-2024.html

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by zipidachimp on 06/30/23 at 00:35:54

How come all these cool bikes are coming to market when I'm approaching the end of my riding days????  Timing has never been my strength, rats!
Cheers!  8-)

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Dave on 06/30/23 at 03:34:49


607260727F6C636E652D0 wrote:
I think the rest of the story might show up in the torque figures:

Versys 300   = 19.2 ft/lbs/10,000    40   HP.  Over 11,000 rpm
RE 350"J"     = 20   ft/lbs/  4,000     21   HP            6,100
Triumph 400 = 27.7 ft/lbs/ 6,500     39.5 HP           8,000
LS650          = 37    ft/lbs/ 3,400     31   HP            6,500

Seems odd that the one with the highest HP has the lowest torque.



That doesn't surprise me at all.....the Kawasaki is a parallel twin and all the other engines are single cylinder.  The Kawasaki makes the HP by having 2 smaller pistons revving a bunch faster than a single.  The twin would be a better engine for highway use where you want to maintain faster cruising speeds.......riding in the curvy mountain roads would require that you shift more often than a single.  (My little Kawasaki 250 required you to shift down 2 gears whenever you came out of a tight uphill corner in the mountains - but it could go 80mph on the interstate all day long).

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 06/30/23 at 12:39:11

I think we are amidst a thumper renaissance , what was old is new , again. If your rode a thumper as a youngster it is very likely you will revert back to a thumper as you age. Most have other bike(s) too. Twins are fun but thumpers are satisfying , can’t explain the difference. I’m hard into the Thumper side of camp. Come on BSA get with the plan ! The longer BSA takes the smaller their market share is becoming. Triumph just stole BSA’s
USA market , brilliant time to release the new thumpers.Very attractive bikes , if price point is a value they will sell a ton of those bikes. Getting the new thumpers to USA market before BSA , could be huge for Triumph and possibly crippling for BSA ! Snooze you loose !

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 06/30/23 at 12:53:58

Just saw it in the pic , right there in my face !
The Triumph single is going to be a great , yup you guessed it
One badas$ flat tracker !

Close your eyes an imagine some fiber glass bodywork on it with 19” hoops
Some real sexy shapes and lines.

This bike should sell real well.  8-)

Honda will miss out on market share too by not importing the GB350 !  :-/

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 06/30/23 at 22:45:50

Let’s hope Triumph isn’t dangling a carrot like BSA has been for years.
Can they deliver ? To the US market ? RE  with good bikes at a good price.
Can they , will they try to compete in that same market , I think it would be great timing ( sooner the better ) for Triumph. I’m not gettin excited till the local dealer has a few on the floor. I noticed the tail section of the frame is a bolt on , what ever you want. Road racer , flat tracker , standard , just make a new tail section for the bodywork. I like that feature.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by MMRanch on 07/01/23 at 05:28:12

 I think we are amidst a thumper renaissance

Hay Zip , you are Soooo lucky ... now that your of the right age all these small and LIght (Old Man) Thumpers are showing up. !!!   :)

How LUCKY CAN WE GET  ???  ;)

The RE 350 "J" has a "Performance Cam" now that kicks the power level up about 20% , an air filter system 5% , exaust 5% , and a fuel modular thing 5-10% , Torque and HP numbers both.   Makes it a different bike from what I understand ...  :-?     It's already Torque rich for a air cooled 350 single.

Honda is going to have to bring the CB350 air cooled single to the USA now too !  It's even prettier than the Meteor is !!  ;)



Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Serowbot on 07/01/23 at 07:45:44

That looks like one heck of a bike!

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by ohiomoto on 07/01/23 at 17:33:29

Mag wheels, inverted forks, monoshock, and water cooling remove these bikes from the "Retro" category.   But the "Retro" seat and tank have an allure.

I think the frame is a little more traditional as well.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by MMRanch on 07/01/23 at 19:42:49

This needs to come to the USA in a 500cc bike.

https://www.rideapart.com/news/491449/honda-cb350-wide-global-release-rumors/


Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/01/23 at 19:52:37

It's about at the top of my weight limit. It sounds like it's got everything I want in a bike.
Have they said what the seat height is?

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 07/02/23 at 13:24:25

Haven’t seen a spec sheet on it yet. Only visual thing on the bike I absolutely can’t stand , totally makes the bike look thrown together without any prior planning or they were too far down the line to go back and change it. Gives it a Chinese like quality look to the bike , besides paint work.
Most here know me pretty good by now.

Who here sees what I’m seeing ?
Clue : you rarely see it on any bike  , let alone on a so called quality bike.
So chime in , let me know what is that visual distraction that is just plain old crappy looking !

For me it could be a deciding factor not to buy it , shame on you Triumph !

Who can see it ? Let’s here it !

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 07/02/23 at 13:32:16

I’ll bet it’s being built in India , the biggest market , makes total sense. India , Europe and then the US , that tells me 1 to 2 years before we’ll see it. I do like that it’s not a parallel twin and it is their engine not some Honda clone. Probably like the BSA , jointly developed , with Rotax. Real world is  Triumph gives them a rough draft of engines looks and then Rotax does what it does best is build engines.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by ohiomoto on 07/02/23 at 19:33:54

The dingleberry horn Ruttly?

I don't dig it but not many people will sit on a rock and stare at the bike for hours, so I'll forgive and forget.

If I had a scrambler, I would pull the headlight screen.  It's just too trendy for me.  

I'm pretty much fine with everything about these for the price point they are targeting.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by jcstokes on 07/02/23 at 21:06:27

Will apparently be sold in New Zealand from January 2024, price unknown.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 07/02/23 at 22:14:44

No , but I missed that I’ll have to go back and look. Are we knocking off more points ?

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 07/02/23 at 23:37:16

Hopefully they fix that pre production , definite eye sore.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Dave on 07/04/23 at 04:19:17


1C3B3A3A22374E0 wrote:
Who here sees what I’m seeing ?
Clue : you rarely see it on any bike  , let alone on a so called quality bike.

Who can see it ? Let’s here it !


I don't believe I see what you dislike.  Everything I see appears to be pretty common on modern motorcycles.

I am not a fan of the rear fender extenders/license plate mounts or short front fenders that are on a lot of bikes these days, and I would prefer proper fenders that actually keep crap from being thrown on you and/or the bike.

Even new sport touring bikes have front fenders that are really short and allow road debris/mud/water to be thrown up on the engine/frame.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 07/04/23 at 05:16:35

Clue :
They did an excellent job of hiding it on both bikes , in plain view
The first thing your eyes focuses on

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by TheSneeze on 07/04/23 at 09:25:46

The covers over the carb/intake area.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Dave on 07/04/23 at 14:30:02

I suppose the little emblems that say "SPEED" and "SCRAMBLER 400X" are a bit cheesy looking.

I would likely remove those and paint or powder coat them to be a bit nicer looking.

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 07/04/23 at 15:30:12

Both Fuel tank use great colors that help hide imperfections. Big imperfections ! Both tanks are different capacity and don’t get me wrong I like both models , BUT !
The dimpled fuel tanks to me screams CHEAP and these bikes deserve better. Dimples for space relief for triple trees and fork legs is well hidden. I have to say it looks like crap , the graphics just continue the trendy cheap look. And the properly named Dingleberry horn. If I wanted cheesy graphics I’d buy a R/E. Let the YouTube reviews roll , see what they find out.
Clearly not excited
Yet !

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Ruttly on 07/08/23 at 10:17:26

The Topic Terminator strikes again

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by Serowbot on 07/08/23 at 11:44:34

They could have made the tanks lower capacity...
I'll take the dimples.
In fact,... they look kinda' cool...

Title: Re: Triumph's 400 Thumpers
Post by justin_o_guy2 on 07/08/23 at 19:19:25


7C6E7C6E63707F7279310 wrote:
This needs to come to the USA in a 500cc bike.

https://www.rideapart.com/news/491449/honda-cb350-wide-global-release-rumors/



I'm liking that

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.