SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Take to the streets
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1728427130

Message started by WebsterMark on 10/08/24 at 15:38:50

Title: Take to the streets
Post by WebsterMark on 10/08/24 at 15:38:50

It’s been asked before what would cause conservatives to take to the streets the leftist do. Here’s one possibility.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/kamala-harris-is-eyeing-your-401-k-tax-plan-corporate-rate-a4cf247e?st=U6e9q5

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by Serowbot on 10/08/24 at 15:49:43

Freedom?, Justice?, Equality?,
Nope

Money

WSJ
Harris Is the Safer Economic Choice
Both candidates have bad ideas, but Trump’s are worse—and likelier to find support in Congress.
https://www.wsj.com/opinion/harris-is-the-safer-economic-choice-2024-presidential-election-ea06b8bf

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by JOG on 10/08/24 at 17:01:51

Stocks Increase in Price just like hamburger. The less a dollar is worth the more Of them it takes to Buy stocks. You need to think about trusting your source. The American People were better off when Trump was in office. She's a disaster. Simple facts.

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by MnSpring on 10/08/24 at 20:15:59

If Harris wins (the UL, LIBERAL, SOCIALIST REGIME)

Gift money, as much as you can to low income people you trust, to buy you a car/vacation/whatever, when you need one.

Put money in metals, (like gold/silver)
A 'Barter' system will be coming.

Drain your money accounts, and if anyone asks where that went, you tell them it went to xxx Indian Casino and I Lost. Talk to them !
(While you have converted the, 'paper', to gold)

If you are selling land, raise the price 33%, or sell it fast, before she raises Capital Gains.

Then HANG ON, for 4 years.
Which this Nation will completely go down the tubes.
Or, RISE from the ashes, and become a Free Nation again.

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/24 at 03:41:03

The important concept to remember is that when government increases its taxes on corporations so they pay their “fair share”, what that really means is the government gets first claim on their profits before those who are relying on a 401(k) for the their retirement do.

Regarding economists, they’re like a$$holes, everybody’s got one and they don’t mind the way theirs smells.

I realize this is a difficult concept for many of you, but use your common sense. Does taking more money from the top affect you at the bottom? Of course it does. Do you really think the government uses that money appropriately? Of course, it does not. Otherwise, we would not have a deficit.

Yes, tariffs also trickle down to the lower classes, but the one thing about tariffs is they force another domestic company to come in and fill the gap which is potentially a better outcome than increasing taxes on domestic corporation.

Key word: potentially. That’s the problem with economics. It’s not a science it’s not even an art. It’s political spin. There are a few very solid laws of economics. For the most part economics is a blank canvas that anyone can paint on, if they have the paint and an audience to look at it.

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by Eegore on 10/09/24 at 05:37:53

This article is inaccurate in regard to stock value. It claims:

The value of a share of stock is the present value discounted by the expected after-tax future earnings of the company.

That's not exclusively how it works. The value of Company Stock is equal to the present value of the future dividends plus the present value of the forecasted selling price.

Taxes take play but the statement in the article is over-simplified to blame the entire holdings deviations on taxation.

Given the opportunity to let the Government handle my investments, or a Private Company, I would typically choose a private company. Then again huge corporations aren't exactly known for getting all that money from honest straightforward business practices.

Given the opportunity to let a Private Company run air-traffic control around the US or the Government, I would choose the Government. However that level of coordination and funding would require tax dollars.

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by Serowbot on 10/09/24 at 06:53:00

I hope all you financial geniuses are heavily invested in Trump's Truth Social
He's a brilliant, honest businessman
You're in safe hands with him

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/24 at 06:56:30

Given the opportunity to let a Private Company run air-traffic control around the US or the Government, I would choose the Government. However that level of coordination and funding would require tax dollars.

If you had a bottle of life-saving pills that you absolutely had to get into a loved one’s hands the next day, would you use the US Postal Service priority mail, express next day service ……or ……FedEx?

And the value a stock is based on a lot of factors and I don’t think the article blamed everything on taxes. It was making a very clear point that when you raise taxes on corporations, that has the potential of lowering their revenue. There’s no doubt about that. It’s an extra expense that they have to find a way around. If they can’t, that impacts the value of a stock, which impacts 401(k)s, which impacts retirements.

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/24 at 06:58:05

786E79647C69647F0B0 wrote:

I hope all you financial geniuses are heavily invested in Trump's Truth Social
He's a brilliant, honest businessman
You're in safe hands with him

Yes, but have you considered Biden‘s business ventures, oh wait, he’s worked for the government his entire life. Well, then there’s always Kamala, wait…She’s done nothing her entire life but work for the government.

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by Eegore on 10/09/24 at 07:28:13

If you had a bottle of life-saving pills that you absolutely had to get into a loved one’s hands the next day, would you use the US Postal Service priority mail, express next day service ……or ……FedEx?

I would use FedEx.

If you had to buy a bottle of life-saving pills that you absolutely had to get into a loved one’s hands the next day, would you buy from an FDA accredited manufacturer or a private manufacturer with no oversight?

This what if thing can go on forever.

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by Serowbot on 10/09/24 at 08:02:32

0F3D3A2B2C3D2A15392A33580 wrote:

She’s done nothing her entire life but work for the government.

Prosecuting criminals
like Trump for instance

Title: Re: Take to the streets
Post by WebsterMark on 10/09/24 at 09:14:44

5E7E7C74697E1B0 wrote:

Yes it could. For example , I’d rather the airlines handle security instead of TSA.