SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Not an opinion..
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1729267567

Message started by JOG on 10/18/24 at 09:06:06

Title: Not an opinion..
Post by JOG on 10/18/24 at 09:06:06

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgPEm2gIekhetTzIdgrQJNhdwQMQNkojPmRa5sNqCtQ0cFjr0atlEwJf4OK_AruMZ83ugLxhHhb02xHGMO1LTFG3vWMeODIdgKY0JCAewd5f8y0GHU8_9q1mgg6ACFrNqz4LrJyce3BfoEvikNlYBp8-tmwdnQvfnSe9J2q_cjq62YA7BhRq4kWRtMxJfc/s721/90milesd32df9686929f0b8626dbcd8edc49936_71995c67_640.

Tax on Unrealized Gains is insanity. It's not just going to destroy property owners.
Renters will be paying the landlords taxes. Vote for that horrible creature.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Serowbot on 10/18/24 at 15:58:39

Many ignore the fact that the plan would only impact those whose net worth is more than $100 million, or less than 1% of taxpayers, and falsely suggest that all homeowners should fear a new massive tax bill.

Still worried?

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Eegore on 10/18/24 at 16:04:56

So while I'm not a fan of taxing unrealized capitol gains for anyone, I am also not a fan of being lied to and told I will be taxed the same way.

The difference here is the lie effects me and the taxation does not.

So should I ignore the lie that actually impacts my life in favor of complaining about something that will never happen to me, or should I ignore the taxation and acknowledge the lie?

My opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is, would be acknowledging I am being lied to.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by JOG on 10/18/24 at 21:44:50

Isn't that what she's proposing? Taxing Unrealized gains?
Why ,ohh,WHY, Would I NOT believe THAT? SHE'S a total disaster.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Eegore on 10/19/24 at 02:47:12

Isn't that what she's proposing? Taxing Unrealized gains?
Why ,ohh,WHY, Would I NOT believe THAT? SHE'S a total disaster.

You should believe that. You should not believe it will directly, and only the word "directly" to include all words synonymous with the word "directly" with the exemption of all other known words - directly impact you until you have over 100 million dollars in assets.

This is my opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by WebsterMark on 10/19/24 at 04:23:26

This question only has one answer: no.

Taxing unrealized capital gains is wrong regardless if you believe it affects you or not. But most importantly, it perpetuates the believe for some that government has the inherent right to expand their claim on your assets anytime they perceive a collective need arises.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Serowbot on 10/19/24 at 07:07:38

We have trillions of debt... 1/3 belongs to the Donald and he gave the wealthiest a yuge tax cut, piling that onto the debt
Somebody's got to pay that
Why not those with 95% of the money?

I don't think you'll see any folks with $100,000,000 on the street corner with cardboard signs any time soon
Gains tax or not

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Eegore on 10/19/24 at 07:24:34

Why not those with 95% of the money?

Because people with more money than you are not less deserving of it.

Especially when it's money the Government thinks you/they might make later.

This is my opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Serowbot on 10/19/24 at 08:15:28

0525272F3225400 wrote:

Because people with more money than you are not less deserving of it.

Sure they are
You don't know me,.. I'm very deserving :)

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by zevenenergie on 10/19/24 at 09:04:30

Let's not forget that this is a proposal.During election time.

Harris is literally just a facade and she doesn't make these things up herself. Those at the helm Are very wealthy and if they want to implement this they will not suffer any disadvantages. We will suffer the disadvantages of everything they want.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by WebsterMark on 10/19/24 at 16:54:04

Debt is caused by years of overspending. The idea the rich aren’t paying their fair share is nonsense. The idea you can solve the debt by taxing the rich is even more nonsense.

And my taxes went down with Trump and I am not rich.

As I always say, stop asking the government to do your dirty work Serowbot.

Go stand outside a nice restaurant tonight, a Morton’s or Ruth Cris, and ask a few people’s coming out to pay their fair share. Then send what you get to the government as a donation.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Serowbot on 10/20/24 at 06:42:34

Trump paid $750
Did you?
This may because he is such a bad businessman he lost yuge money
We reward the rich for that
Losing

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by JOG on 10/22/24 at 17:59:13

6D7261727972797265707E72170 wrote:

Bilderbergers?

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by JOG on 10/23/24 at 04:57:59

So,you guys who don't even BeLieve there was censorship watched the Video? Ol' Jeevan just Spillin those beans?

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by WebsterMark on 10/24/24 at 03:10:53

6C7A6D70687D706B1F0 wrote:

Trump paid $750
Did you?
This may because he is such a bad businessman he lost yuge money
We reward the rich for that
Losing

No, I did not.
And just like Trump and hopefully you because you do not strike me as stupid, when I have my taxes done, my tax guy looks for every possible legal loophole to reduce my debt.

The most offensive part of this texting unrealized capital gains is the attitude. No one should be in favor of this.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by JOG on 10/24/24 at 07:38:50

7167706D75606D76020 wrote:

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Serowbot on 10/24/24 at 08:05:23

If you have $100,000,000 in assets
That's a hundred million dollars, in case you don't understand numbers
Do you?

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Eegore on 10/24/24 at 09:15:43

You don't see what that will do to YOU?
If you own a house and it is Valued,for tax purposes, higher than you paid for it, you will be taxed on the Increase in Value.
If you rent, the landlord will be taxed on the increase in the value of His property.
Now,, exactly Who is Actually going to cough up Those dollars?

This is not true. Again the problem is not just the actual proposal but all the nonsense lies people tell about the proposal. You were lied to.

Unless you have 100,000,000 - One Hundred Million in assets, you will not be taxed on unrealized gains. The honest argument using facts and not lies is that humans with 100 Million should also not be taxed on assets they never gained but might someday. So a landlord with hundreds of millions of dollars in tenants would be passing that cost on, but not 99% of average landlords.

This is my opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by WebsterMark on 10/24/24 at 10:34:05

Would a for-profit museum have to pay this tax on a collection of artifacts with an obvious market value over $100 million?

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by Eegore on 10/24/24 at 10:40:25

Would a for-profit museum have to pay this tax on a collection of artifacts with an obvious market value over $100 million?

Since no official proposal is presented that I know of there is no way to tell. I can imagine this would not apply to businesses in specific corporate financial structures - or maybe none at all. This is my opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is.

Title: Re: Not an opinion..
Post by WebsterMark on 10/24/24 at 16:13:30

Actually, the point is moot because anybody with $100 million net worth, is smart enough to hire the right lawyers and tax people, and avoid the tax altogether so nothing will happen.