SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Dictator in Chief! /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1737206281 Message started by WebsterMark on 01/18/25 at 05:18:01 |
Title: Dictator in Chief! Post by WebsterMark on 01/18/25 at 05:18:01 Puddinhead declares we now have a 28th Amendment? For all of you who’s panties will be bunched up Monday at noon claiming that we have installed a dictator, there’s nothing more dictator-like than Biden‘s last minute claim the 28th amendment has been ratified. The deadline has passed years, if not, decades ago, yet somehow the Democratic Party is claiming victory. Sounds like election deniers to me. The only thing worse will be his upcoming pardons his business partners. |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by MnSpring on 01/18/25 at 06:16:23 Nothing but ANOTHER, attempted roadblock, from the UL, Socialist Triad. (saying it came from MUSH for brains) The real SCARY part is more draconian REMOVING OF FREEDOM, which is Newsom's contribution. "... The 28th Amendment refers to proposed changes to the U.S. Constitution, with various proposals including the Equal Rights Amendment for gender equality and Governor Newsom's proposal for gun safety measures. ..." |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by JOG on 01/18/25 at 09:25:21 It's hard to decide if he was lying. He might actually believe what he was saying. YaKnow, lies aren't the same. Do these pants make.... Inconsequential. Bidens lies? Go back to his claims, I had a full scholarship, I graduated near the top. His whole LIfE has been based on lies. He plagiarized and Bullschitted ,grifted and lied through the whole thing. His family, and the Bush family are all crooks. |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by thumperclone on 01/18/25 at 14:05:28 6B5E4D554E494D5E482C0 wrote:
the LIAR IN CHEIF is set to take the helm over 3k lies during his last time in office and you lemmings keep drinking it up |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by JOG on 01/18/25 at 14:17:16 Did biden lie? I WILL NOT pardon Hunter. Check out the new constitutional amendment I signed! I'm sure Trump has lied, he's been wrong and He's been stupid, pushing the jabs. Can you admit that your boy lies? |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by thumperclone on 01/18/25 at 15:14:01 Biden did lie his actions have shown he is not firing on all cylinders the orange FELON is the supposed to be the acute one why then the need to outright LIE? 30,573 during his first term explain why that is alright |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by JOG on 01/18/25 at 16:46:58 I was specific. What lies would you list that Trump told? |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by thumperclone on 01/19/25 at 01:44:50 one for you to chew on coronavirus is under control you can look up more I'm done doing your searches now that Biden is out how long will you keep up the senseless bashing? |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by MnSpring on 01/19/25 at 06:23:02 273B263E233621303F3C3D36530 wrote:
WOW, THAT, is the kettle calling the pot black !!!!! |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by Serowbot on 01/19/25 at 08:40:22 4E524F574A5F48595655545F3A0 wrote:
"One day, it will just go away"-Trump My best friend and his wife and 10 other members of their church are fighting Covid as we speak As for specifics... Trump said Mexico will pay for the wall No wall, no payment |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by JOG on 01/19/25 at 09:11:43 And biden said the border is secure. Are you Certain that Mexico isn't suffering financially Because Trump is unhappy with their handling of the border? Would you be able to admit that Mexico WAS "Paying" if a pile of boxes of evidence stacked next to a corvette was presented? |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by Eegore on 01/19/25 at 09:40:13 It appears to me that this post indicates, and this is an opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is, that politicians lie. |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by WebsterMark on 01/19/25 at 15:36:46 79595B534E593C0 wrote:
Nope. Other than my prediction of pardons, the rest is fact, |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by Eegore on 01/19/25 at 20:16:53 Nope. Other than my prediction of pardons, the rest is fact, My opinion, is that all politicians lie. This is an opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is. |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by blod on 01/19/25 at 23:40:33 5E6B78607B7C786B7D190 wrote:
How about the Covid-19 vaccinations are safe and effective. Trump was the main instigator and therefore murderer No1. Don't forget operation Warp Speed :) |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by JOG on 01/20/25 at 04:48:07 I've hated on Trump many times for his safe and effective. That he believed that when the jabs Started is one thing. After people started falling dead and he Kept pushing it? Bad,very bad. What I Don't see are leftards criticism of biden. |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by Eegore on 01/20/25 at 07:46:55 After people started falling dead and he Kept pushing it? Bad,very bad. What I Don't see are leftards criticism of biden. What I don't see is any criticism of false vaccine death information. Bad, very bad. When a lot of the "dropped dead" are alive, it makes it hard for humans that did not already decide, before the vaccine was implemented, that it would kill people. Multiple Olympians in the last games were on your list of "D.E.A.D" athletes. Almost every human in the "youth" category was over age 30. "Coupla outliers" was the reasoning for repeatedly referencing that blatantly false information. How can Trump possibly look at that information and claim the vaccine was killing millions of young people? Again, if the vaccine was killing even .05 percent thousands would have died daily. Did they? Are there millions of missing humans we don't know about? If anything Trump needs to acknowledge the actual demographic of at-risk and dead humans - not the lies about all these dead kids. I'm not sure he will do that since he was so proud of Warp Speed. So humans that will actually be killed - not the lying dead kid nonsense - the actual at risk demographics will be in the dark. Hopefully the DoD medical records can be kept in the public eye, especially the cardiac issues. |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by blod on 01/20/25 at 09:57:35 0A2A28203D2A4F0 wrote:
Is this BS in your opinion ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx3k725PV5Y |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by JOG on 01/20/25 at 10:49:17 Now Who would report The Suddenly Dead inaccurately? And WHO has the ability to locate the inaccurate reports? And How does that make the actual Suddenly Dead NOT dead? |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by Eegore on 01/20/25 at 11:15:12 Is this BS in your opinion ? The first sentence in that video is "Working age people". I am saying the lies about millions of kids dying are lies. Kids are not "working age people". https://cbn.com/news/health/sudden-deaths-skyrocketed-among-working-aged-people-2021-and-2022 While the individual in the video indicates "hundreds" of examples, if you look at his numbers they compare the Swiss study in 2006 to literally the entire planet. Yeah I expect if I compare one data set to a global majority, the global majority will have higher numbers. Either way, there is an increase and blindly claiming its a vaccine while repeatedly defending blatantly false and mathematically impossible information is pointless. Millions kids have been vaccinated, 1000 dead kids is nothing like claiming 8-million died in the US alone in a single year. A human stating they have "SEEN" two or 3 kids die on "live TV" is nothing close to "proof" that millions of kids died. This video demonstrates an actual assessment of actual dead humans and not catchphrase clickbait headlines designed to make the website money while people get all pissed off over completely inaccurate information. |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by Eegore on 01/20/25 at 11:25:13 Now Who would report The Suddenly Dead inaccurately? And WHO has the ability to locate the inaccurate reports? And How does that make the actual Suddenly Dead NOT dead? Them being alive is what makes them NOT dead. Why would anyone want to use source material that lies to them? Use material that is somewhat close to being maybe accurate. Using lies to show the truth is the problem. It's like a hospital claiming 800 patients died with Covid in one year so they could cash-cow the Federal assistance payments. Then once looked at it appears the hospital had 700 total patients that year. Instead of acknowledging that, a human instead doubles-down and says they have "seen" people saying at hospitals on the news and scurries off to find supporting evidence on the internet. The vaccine is damaging, but not killing millions upon millions of people per-year. There's no way that many die and we aren't seeing supporting evidence, like missing people, mourning families, funerals, abandoned homes, lower school enrollments, millions more job openings, less cars on the road, memorials, abandoned PO boxes/homes/postal addresses, missing players on sports teams, fewer actors in film/TV, fewer STDs, fewer scheduled medical appointments, fewer grocery store sales, etc. |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by blod on 01/20/25 at 11:36:59 7F5F5D55485F3A0 wrote:
So are you saying that this video is not BS ? https://cbn.com/news/health/sudden-deaths-skyrocketed-among-working-aged-peop... |
Title: Re: Dictator in Chief! Post by Eegore on 01/20/25 at 13:05:30 So are you saying that this video is not BS ? I'm saying the video does not represent what I am talking about. Dead kids. We were lied to by many, many sources about these tremendous amounts of dead kids. Your video further supports the undeniable fact that millions of kids did not die from the vaccine. Some did, more than what should have, but not millions and millions, not even a few thousand. The video has merit, while I dispute the mathematical process the human in the video utilized on one aspect of multiple calculations, the video is still more accurate than all these lying nonsense sources stating kids are dropping dead all over the place. Below is an example of blatantly lying source material, that for some reason we were expected to act like it is true. https://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1659717149/3#3 Also in that thread notice the math would require 4345.9957 pregnancies per-day, to mitigate the claimed number of miscarriage's post-vaccine. Why can't the vaccine cause miscarriages without using the preposterous math? |
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |