|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> loyality /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1738331390 Message started by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 05:49:50 |
|
Title: loyality Post by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 05:49:50 what other criminal organization demands total loyalty to the boss like the current blamer in chiefs' administration? |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by WebsterMark on 01/31/25 at 05:54:25 5D415C44594C5B4A4546474C290 wrote:
Every single one, including the Biden Administration. WTH? Do you think any President is gonna hire someone for his cabinet who is not loyal? Obama‘s attorney general said he was his wingman. Dude, wake up. Turn off CNN. Turn off MSNBC. Stop listening to Tammy Duckworth and that idiot senator from Hawaii and Pocahontas. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 08:11:35 actually I got the idea from watching a History channel piece on the Mafia |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by WebsterMark on 01/31/25 at 08:18:50 BS. It’s a talking point that the Democrats and liberal media have been repeating constantly since Trump announced his choices. I’ve heard and read it a thousand times. Here’s one of hundreds of articles. https://www.npr.org/2024/11/16/g-s1-34532/trump-cabinet-loyalists |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 08:33:35 the ONLY prerequisite for a tRUMP appointment is arse kissing |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by WebsterMark on 01/31/25 at 08:56:31 You can’t be so foolish as to think appointing people loyal to you is a trait unique to Trump, are you? And if that were true, I’m sure I could find where you elsewhere pointed out cabinet members during his first term refused to endorse him which means loyalty to the degree you think was present wasn’t. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by Eegore on 01/31/25 at 09:00:24 Every single one, including the Biden Administration. Agreed. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by WebsterMark on 01/31/25 at 09:41:09 I’ve never hired someone I thought would be disloyal either to me or the organization I was working for. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 10:03:16 7E4C4B5A5D4C5B64485B42290 wrote:
with qualifications |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by MnSpring on 01/31/25 at 10:42:01 6B776A726F7A6D7C7370717A1F0 wrote:
I believe it would be a person, who was 'Qualified', Not a. '3-fer', cause it would look good. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 12:03:11 name one potential appointee who is qualified for the post |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by Serowbot on 01/31/25 at 12:44:51 Do you really think an alcoholic Fox News weekend host with a history of sexual abuse is the best person in the country to run the entire military? ...or a guy that denies vaccines, thinks our water causes trans, eats road kill, and had a worm in his brain should run our healthcare system? "I hire all the best people"- tRump ::) |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by JOG on 01/31/25 at 12:46:03 736F726A776275646B686962070 wrote:
Explain why Any of them aren't. Have you even Looked at the trainwrecks biden had? BYW,I know I shouldn't be surprised, but you misspelled Loyalty. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by Serowbot on 01/31/25 at 12:47:03 See above |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by JOG on 01/31/25 at 12:50:24 Your memory of reality is short. You have a history of believing allegations. Unless they are true and against a democrat. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by Serowbot on 01/31/25 at 12:51:54 1B2E3D253E393D2E385C0 wrote:
Did he misspell it, "arse kissing"? |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by JOG on 01/31/25 at 12:58:21 You thought that was clever? Seriously? [ch129300] |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by JOG on 01/31/25 at 13:03:11 You lefty clowns throwout a charge out, and No Specificity . Name an appointee and EXPRESS WHY YOU don't think they are qualified. Have you LOOKED at the Muthafukkin FREAKSHOW biden had? I've always despised Our diversity is our strength. I've pointed out Why diversity Isn't strength. And Hegseth straight up said it's the dumbest thing he's ever heard. Check out his background. He's qualified. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by Serowbot on 01/31/25 at 13:06:40 0B3E2D352E292D3E284C0 wrote:
Hello? 4A5C4B564E5B564D390 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by JOG on 01/31/25 at 13:16:35 Look,you need to quit being a professional leftard. We,the American people, the MAJORITY have looked,listened and said You are Wrong. Now, you and your leftard friends need to Shaddup and Let the Adults run things. Look at the Big Blue Cities your policies are used. They are the most crime ridden economic failures in America. So WHY THE FUKK would anyone listen to anything you leftards Say? The BIGGEST question is How long do you have to be That Wrong before you figure out just how much of a FUKKING Idiot you are? |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 13:47:11 democrats are largest party independents are second republicans third unaffiliated make up the rest your ranting shows how juvenile you are the orange FELON won by less than 2% |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 13:53:18 BYW,I know I shouldn't be surprised, but you misspelled Loyalty.[/quote] OMG :o were you able to figure out what I was talking about? here Mr. English diagram this sentence: F you you FKN FK |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by JOG on 01/31/25 at 14:01:30 7A667B637E6B7C6D6261606B0E0 wrote:
If you weren't so separated from reason and logic you would never have said that. YOU LOST IN A MUTHAFUKKIN LANDSLIDE. If you Libtards Were The Majority He would NOT HAVE WON. Not by one tenth of a percent |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by Eegore on 01/31/25 at 14:04:22 your ranting shows how juvenile you are And then.... here Mr. English diagram this sentence: F you you FKN FK |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by Serowbot on 01/31/25 at 14:12:00 1520332B3037332036520 wrote:
So these are the adults? Really? Quote:
This is indefensible |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by JOG on 01/31/25 at 14:26:30 5070727A6770150 wrote:
Okay, I'll take a swing at it Based on what I remember from my sixth grade English teacher I'm going with Fukk you you fukkin fukk. After your calling me a POS which I responded to with what I thought was a clever poem,I Think I can interpret your Very Cleverly disguised insults. I Have a pretty good, good being Sufficient, Adequate, Having the Ability to bring forth Understanding because of being exposed to my vocabulary, ability to express my beliefs and describe what I see, yet ,even though I Have such abilities and capabilities, I lack words sufficiently negative to describe exactly what a lowlife Muthafukker I see you as. I despise you, and I well know, you hate me,with the same intensity. But you are not intellectually capable of expressing it. And you also believe You are my intellectual superior. Boil in your own juices. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 14:31:02 failed diagram means which are the verb, noun, pronoun etc. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by thumperclone on 01/31/25 at 14:33:05 0A3F2C342F282C3F294D0 wrote:
Okay, I'll take a swing at it Based on what I remember from my sixth grade English teacher I'm going with Fukk you you fukkin fukk. After your calling me a POS which I responded to with what I thought was a clever poem,I Think I can interpret your Very Cleverly disguised insults. I Have a pretty good, good being Sufficient, Adequate, Having the Ability to bring forth Understanding because of being exposed to my vocabulary, ability to express my beliefs and describe what I see, yet ,even though I Have such abilities and capabilities, I lack words sufficiently negative to describe exactly what a lowlife Muthafukker I see you as. I despise you, and I well know, you hate me,with the same intensity. But you are not intellectually capable of expressing it. And you also believe You are my intellectual superior. Boil in your own juices. [/quote] my dog is your intellectual superior! if I have trouble expressing it how do I get under your skin? |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by JOG on 01/31/25 at 14:43:54 IDK what kinda dog you have, but that Sumbitch must be some kinda mechanic. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by MnSpring on 01/31/25 at 16:40:49 726E736B766374656A696863060 wrote:
A-Yep !!!!! Not a problem saying that about a member of this forum. if you are of the, 'correct political bent' ! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D OH, BTY, Bot, who is, 'us', ? in regard to. UL, DFI, FDS, WOKE, SOCIALIST |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by Eegore on 01/31/25 at 16:47:55 IDK what kinda dog you have, but that Sumbitch must be some kinda mechanic. Nice. |
|
Title: Re: loyality Post by MnSpring on 01/31/25 at 16:50:51 706C716974617667686B6A61040 wrote:
Wrong. "... The partisan identification of registered voters is now evenly split between the two major parties: 49% of registered voters are Democrats or lean to the Democratic Party, and a nearly identical share – 48% – are Republicans or lean to the Republican Party. ..." https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/the-partisanship-and-ideology-of-american-voters/ The really BIG difference is. The Democratic Party has the most, Gimme, GIMME, GIMME people. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |