|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Murdering scumbag /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1738524475 Message started by blod on 02/02/25 at 11:27:55 |
|
Title: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/02/25 at 11:27:55 Obviously not satisfied with the deaths and injuries he has already caused. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Zmj5YFE1HX8?feature=share |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by JOG on 02/02/25 at 20:09:04 You're either absolutely right Or Totally wrong. How will we ever know? I think the Technology is there. The question is What is the Motive for using it? If the technology is there to Solve the problem, the same scientific understanding could be used to make it worse. The globalists have declared the world is overpopulated. I certainly wouldn't jump on this. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/03/25 at 07:40:01 6055465E4542465543270 wrote:
It's not a secret, it's just an extension of operation warp speed. The Trump lovers prefer not to talk about it. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by WebsterMark on 02/03/25 at 08:14:59 What are you talking about? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/03/25 at 09:24:13 013334252233241B37243D560 wrote:
Trump still pushing the mRNA poison. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by WebsterMark on 02/03/25 at 10:51:27 I heard the press conference when this was announced, and I’ve followed this story since my company is heavily involved in data centers. The truth is, no one knows exactly how those vaccines would be delivered. We’re at step six and there’s 49 more steps to go or something like that. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Serowbot on 02/03/25 at 11:05:14 What do real medical scientists that don't eat road kill or have worms in their brains think? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by WebsterMark on 02/03/25 at 13:45:26 1204130E16030E15610 wrote:
No, no no no no. “Real medical scientist“ are often times wrong. And who is an actual real medical science, for you anyway, depends on their political affiliation. The coronavirus vaccine wasn’t as dangerous as some say it was, but it certainly wasn’t as safe as others say it was. I did not trip over dead bodies from people who took the vaccine. But I also didn’t trip over healthy people who died from Covid. In fact, I just saw this the other day not a single healthy child under 18 died from Covid. Zero. Our mistake with the pandemic was insisting everybody take it. That was a mistake, i’m on plenty of others. I’m staying out of these discussions on the vaccine and mRNA. I don’t know enough about it, and I really don’t have any interest in learning about it. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Serowbot on 02/03/25 at 14:01:39 I'm currently in a 6 month mRna flu study 3 months in and fine If I get a brain worm I'll let you know :-? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by JOG on 02/03/25 at 14:38:56 Good luck with that.. What do they pay a guy to do that? Where is it run out of? How did you find out about the opportunity? This is Way outside My understanding of Normal, so I hope you will tell us about it. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/03/25 at 15:00:31 4075667E6562667563070 wrote:
Who are you talking to ? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Serowbot on 02/03/25 at 15:36:09 566370687374706375110 wrote:
My doctor asked if I would be interested It pays about $500 One visit includes a shot, another at 1 month a blood test, then you have an phone app you check in with once a week (takes 20 seconds) for 6 months I have a buddy doing it too If you want to try it, and can try to hook you up... it's a worldwide study :P |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/03/25 at 16:39:30 2B3D2A372F3A372C580 wrote:
My doctor asked if I would be interested It pays about $500 One visit includes a shot, another at 1 month a blood test, then you have an phone app you check in with once a week (takes 20 seconds) for 6 months I have a buddy doing it too If you want to try it, and can try to hook you up... it's a worldwide study :P [/quote] Sounds wonderful. If I were you I would not hesitate ! |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by JOG on 02/03/25 at 17:39:05 I'm not Hesitant I'm not Reluctant I'm not even almost curious I'm in the Notta Muthafukkin CHANCE crowd I don't need the money If I did, I still wouldn't play Russian roulet. But, that some people are willing to actually put their lives on the line for a few bucks Its no surprise. Polyester isn't the Best brain matter. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/03/25 at 18:37:34 1025362E3532362533570 wrote:
;D |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/04/25 at 07:26:38 The coronavirus vaccine wasn’t as dangerous as some say it was, but it certainly wasn’t as safe as others say it was. I did not trip over dead bodies from people who took the vaccine. But I also didn’t trip over healthy people who died from Covid. Agreed. A big problem is the amount of humans blindly accepting the death rates of Covid, and also the amount blindly accepting the death rates of vaccines. Billions could have died from Covid but did not, so if 1% were killed we all would have seen hundreds and hundreds around us die in a year. We didn't. Billions are vaccinated, if 1% died we all would have seen hundreds and hundreds around us die in a year. We didn't. Of course it makes sense to complain a ton of homeless bodies didn't pile up from Covid, but that same logic doesn't apply to nursing homes, sports teams or schools - where most the vaccinated are. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/04/25 at 07:50:27 1F3F3D35283F5A0 wrote:
I have not seen hundreds and hundreds around me die in a year, but I have seen many previously health people die unexpectedly' What I have witnessed more than anything is countless life changing injuries. Is there any evidence to show the Covid -19 " Vaccines " have prevented a single death ? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/04/25 at 08:05:51 What I have witnessed more than anything is countless life changing injuries. I would say I have witnessed more of this than any massive death rates. Is there any evidence to show the Covid -19 " Vaccines " have prevented a single death ? This typically boils down to what you would accept as "evidence". Technically I would say no if the argument is that one must prove the vaccinated human would have died - which is impossible and thus mitigates the ability to ever claim a vaccine saved a life. To me, "evidence" would be that the identical demographic of dying humans pre-vaccine are dying less. In this example I can provide nursing homes and humans that correlate with the age and health levels of that demographic. Since, in the US, the highest vaccinated and boosted demographic is the elderly. This is a continually fulfilling supply as humans continue to age. I do not see the same percentage volume of elderly dying today as there was in 2020, specifically from respiratory related complications. So I find it plausible that some of those humans that have aged more and become more-frail could have benefitted from the vaccination. The percentage of death is lower, not higher and not the same. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Serowbot on 02/04/25 at 08:27:27 0237243C2720243721450 wrote:
... but you did ask “Curiouser and curiouser!” cried Alice BTW, I didn't need the money and I did good things with it that didn't benefit myself Most of the people I met in the study didn't need the money either |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/04/25 at 12:43:10 0727252D3027420 wrote:
I would accept irrefutable proof the the Covid 19 mRNA "vaccines " have prevented a single death as evidence ..... But as we all know there is no such proof, we have to accept and believe what we are told by experts who know better than us ::) |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by thumperclone on 02/04/25 at 13:58:57 Dec 2020 pre vaccine 350,000 covid deaths |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/04/25 at 14:06:00 I would accept irrefutable proof the the Covid 19 mRNA "vaccines " have prevented a single death as evidence .... Ok but what would that proof be? For instance if one requires proof the human would not have died, then literally no medication ever could be proven to work - if that is the proof standard. What would be your standard of proof that a vaccine saved a life? But as we all know there is no such proof, we have to accept and believe what we are told by experts who know better than us Or use simple math. If 200 kids die with Disease A every year in a town and a vaccine is introduced and 3 kids die from Disease A, is it plausible that 197 kids developed natural immunity at the exact same time? No need for laboratory imagery or experts, just simple logic. Why aren't more elderly dying if they are the most vaccinated humans on the planet? I truly expect the same level of respiratory illness would be present if the vaccine did nothing, and a higher rate of death if the vaccine was killing "400% more" per year. It certainly could be damaging in the future, and be essentially useless now - but why aren't the elderly dying today like they were in 2020? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/04/25 at 14:40:21 6747454D5047220 wrote:
There are a lot of unanswered questions, but what I know from personal observations is that a lot of people have died and have / are being severely injured after being poisoned by the mRNA injections. I know we have been lied to, I feel sorry for the gullible chumps who blindly trusted, and even now still trust the medical establishment and the governments. Many of them have already died, and many more will die before their time. Refusing the clot shots was the best thing I ever did. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/04/25 at 16:11:44 There are a lot of unanswered questions, but what I know from personal observations is that a lot of people have died and have / are being severely injured after being poisoned by the mRNA injections. Ok but what would your requirement for a vaccine to have saved a life be? You claim you would accept proof, but what would it be? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/04/25 at 19:37:31 5B7B79716C7B1E0 wrote:
I am unaware of any attempt to prove that the mRNA "vaccines" save lives. If I ever see an effort to prove the mRNA vaccines saved even one life I will let you know if I find it acceptable. To the best of my knowledge there are no plans to make any attempt to show the MRNA jabs work |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/04/25 at 19:52:13 Ok but what would your requirement be for a vaccine to have saved a life? I mean I can provide a standard even if I haven't seen it. Like if I wanted proof a human won a motorcycle race and someone asked me what proof I need, I would say a video, some documentation and maybe some witnesses. I would not have to say only once I see someone try to prove a motorcycle race was won, that then I will let you know if that's evidence or not. You see the issue here, anyone can say they want "proof" of anything really but if there is no measurable standard then they are basically saying they will not accept anything as proof. So the burden is on the rest of the planet to bring information that for as far as they know, you would never accept no matter what. Like flat-Earth basically. Nothing is "evidence" of a round planet to those guys. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/05/25 at 05:34:42 735351594453360 wrote:
There is no standard for proof that does not exist. I would like compelling evidence but I am 99.9 % certain that I am never going to get it. Proof of winning a motorcycle race that never took place is hard to accept :) |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/05/25 at 05:45:14 There is no standard for proof that does not exist. So you already decided proof is nonexistent. The point of providing Your own standard is so you can assess if anything meets it. You offer zero standard which guarantees you won't ever accept any evidence as proof. No better way to always be right and everyone else be wrong than that really. I would like compelling evidence but I am 99.9 % certain that I am never going to get it. Proof of winning a motorcycle race that never took place is hard to accept So basically you won't accept any evidence because you already decided it does not exist. It's clear that motorcycle races exist and that any human could before any race put forth a standard for deciding who would win that race, and what proof they would accept. No reasonable individual requires a race to have already happened to decide how and what demonstrates a clear winner. This is like saying no one can predict the winner of a football game that never happened. You don't have to "accept" the proof but you can indicate what you expect to see given a football game happens. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/05/25 at 08:23:59 537371796473160 wrote:
I don't need to dwell on it, I have learned to accept that things as they are. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by thumperclone on 02/05/25 at 09:16:16 polio, mumps, rubella, tetanus, measles no proof they work? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/05/25 at 09:58:51 polio, mumps, rubella, tetanus, measles no proof they work? Not if one already decides there is no proof. Proof doesn't "already exist" so I can't present information on what my personal standard for proof is. See how that works? We all know any human can decide what they will accept as a standard for something and that the standard does not already need to exist. I will accept video footage of a successful heart transplant surgery and statements from the living patient as proof there was a successful heart surgery. Saying it's hard to provide a personal standard for evidence unless heart surgery has already been done is nothing more than a tactic to avoiding being held to my own standards. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/05/25 at 10:03:39 1D3D3F372A3D580 wrote:
I think the polio vaccinations etc are real vaccinations as opposed to unproven mRNA gene therapy. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/05/25 at 10:20:35 Right, but what would you consider to be proof of an effective mRNA process that would be a vaccine? How does it become "proven"? Just like how we can say proof of a polio vaccine = (Standards here) before the polio vaccine was even invented. That is literally how all standards of proof are submitted and achieved. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by thumperclone on 02/05/25 at 10:34:16 if nobody saw a tree in the forest fall did it really happen? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/05/25 at 10:39:38 5777757D6077120 wrote:
Polio has been virtually eradicated, that tells me the polio vaccine has been successful which is good enough for me. Let me know when the mRNA gene therapy has eradicated covid. Until then please shut up cause I'm getting bored with you :) |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/05/25 at 10:41:16 Polio has been virtually eradicated, that tells me the polio vaccine has been successful which is good enough for me. Let me know when the mRNA gene therapy has eradicated covid. Until then please shut up Ok so your standard of proof is the eradication of Covid specific to the populations exposed to mRNA vaccine. How hard was that? |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by blod on 02/05/25 at 10:42:38 5F7F7D75687F1A0 wrote:
Please go away |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Eegore on 02/05/25 at 10:57:40 Please go away Nah. My problem with requiring a complete eradication is that a totally ineffective vaccine would have to be implemented for far too long before alternatives would be explored. I would be ok with control groups having high percentage reductions. I'm not sure how any medical advancements could ever happen if we require they exist and be successful before we decide what they must do to be considered successful. |
|
Title: Re: Murdering scumbag Post by Serowbot on 02/07/25 at 08:11:16 444A4942260 wrote:
Polio has been virtually eradicated, that tells me the polio vaccine has been successful which is good enough for me. Let me know when the mRNA gene therapy has eradicated covid. Until then please shut up cause I'm getting bored with you :) [/quote] You have to take a vaccine for it to have any chance of working :-? |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |