|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> dementia setting in /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1743614971 Message started by thumperclone on 04/02/25 at 10:29:31 |
|
Title: dementia setting in Post by thumperclone on 04/02/25 at 10:29:31 your maga FELON wants to put tariffs on illegal fentanyl imports how does that work? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/02/25 at 12:30:34 Un freakin believable I guess he's killin' two birds with one stone? Donald Trump mocked after claiming he'll put tariffs on ILLEGAL DRUGS in bizarre rant https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/donald-trump-mocked-after-claiming-34981105 In a strange new rant ahead of 'Liberation Day', Donald Trump claimed the US could start placing tariffs on all fentanyl imported into the US - despite it being an illegal drug MAGA Tell us how brilliant that is :-? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by ThumperPaul on 04/02/25 at 13:14:36 Liberation Day - the day we are all freed from the beautiful globalization of world markets and free trade. Where the most efficient producers of goods and services are punished and inferior competition might get a lift. It’s basically DEI for business. If you think about it - it’s like socialism for business. Just like price controls are bad for a free market, tariffs, at the other end of the spectrum, are just as bad if not worse. There so much lunacy going on, but this whole tariff agenda is the absolute worst. Mark my words - this isn’t going to go well or end well. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/02/25 at 13:48:04 Trump still thinks other countries pay for tariffs It's like trying to teach a squirrel to play chess :-? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/02/25 at 15:48:36 Well he's gone and done it, tariff madness, but it looks like it won't pass the Senate So score another nothingburger :-? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by ThumperPaul on 04/02/25 at 16:59:34 5B4D5A475F4A475C280 wrote:
Educate me…isn’t the vote in the Senate only with regard to Canadian tariffs? Either way, it’s good to finally see some balls on the GOP side to stop the madness even if it is ceremonious. They’re rightfully nervous that their constituents aren’t going to tolerate more pain from inflation or damage to their portfolios. Trump tries to suggest only ‘short term pain’. That’s idiotic unless the tariffs are un-done sooner rather than later. The tariffs are more likely to cause a long recession or stagflation. And there’s no reason to believe this tariff BS is going to create good or high paying jobs in the US. Hard working average Americans are already struggling with higher prices and wages not keeping pace. There is part of me that wants the Dougs to suffer and finally wake up about their beloved leader’s incompetence, but that’s no good because we all suffer together if this nightmare plays out. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by thumperclone on 04/02/25 at 18:18:10 there just may be an upside to the lunacy in 1890 the GOP supported tariffs they lost half their seats in 1930 they lost 52 house seats and 8 in the senate after which they had no congressional control for 60 years we shall see the maga FELON might be doing the country a favor |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/03/25 at 03:00:03 Hang on a second you economic gurus, you do know US manufacturers pay tariffs when we sell products made here into those countries right? I told you before my company sold products into Brazil and paid the tariff for years, but when they increase the tariff, we built a plant in Brazil so we could stay competitive. Brazil benefited from that. Do you think BMW is just gonna give up on the US market entirely? I read Germany (and perhaps most, if not all of Europe, I don’t know ) imposes a 10% tariff on US automobiles plus value added tax. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/03/25 at 03:13:21 It is true that we also have tarifs in the Netherlands. Because if I buy JB weld in large packaging in America where it is half the price, then the postman has an invoice from the tax authorities, which means that it becomes the same price as if I bought it in the Netherlands. Ask me how I know. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/03/25 at 03:28:37 I hear more and more people with a leftist orientation who are experts are taking down the Trump administration. This will only get worse over time. But when I look at the qualities of some of these people, I see a moderator who throws gasoline on the fire. A man who puts a piece of wood in his cylinder and then has a mental breakdown here, because he can,t get it out again. And someone who reacts like an inbred hillbilly with mental problems at the slightest word. They vote for this here: http://https://i.imgur.com/TseCEjFm.jpg I would not cross a genius businessman who is a high achiever with a dream team of highly intelligent people who says that America will go bankrupt if we do not transform the government. But no, there are people who know better.... ;)::) I find it so cute and I realy love you. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by ThumperPaul on 04/03/25 at 06:21:34 2F3023303B303B3027323C30550 wrote:
No mental breakdown. But you amused everyone and humiliated yourself with your genius idea of using pure oxygen and a torch to burn up the piece of wood in the cylinder. As far as being somewhat qualified and educated, I am a Finance Major with specialization in international finance and globalization of world markets. I studied under John Ivancevich and other notable experts. I was a career Underwriting and Finance professional and retired well at age 55. Mark - Your example of your company isn’t representative. Are you not paying any attention to what CEOs are saying? What any respected economists around the world are saying? How major investors are reacting? Or are all these people wrong and the Trump Kool-Aid economics gang is right with their faulty, biased, rosy assumptions? The crazy thing about forecasting is that you can create any answer you want by simply using bad assumptions. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/03/25 at 07:11:36 Interesting! Where did you get your Finance Major? John Ivancevich? Wow! What courses did he teach you? What theories about globalization did you find most applicable in practice? I have a practical talent, and I have had a forge for 27 years, and many blacksmiths from home and abroad have visited my forge because it was so practical in its orientation. I was known for my practical solutions and my technical insight. Through my father who was a genius and entrepreneur in the maritime world I came into contact with many extremely rich and intelligent people for whom I did assignments. You got a free tip. My hobby is tuning 2-stroke engines so all in all I think it was not that crazy. I think you have trouble implementing out of the box ideas. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/03/25 at 07:11:48 Mark - Your example of your company isn’t representative. Why is it not representative [color=#000000]? Are you not paying any attention to what CEOs are saying?[/color] CEOs will tell you they’re going to achieve net by2030 and not a single one of them believes that. What any respected economists around the world are saying? How major investors are reacting? Or are all these people wrong and the Trump Kool-Aid economics gang is right with their faulty, biased, rosy assumptions? The crazy thing about forecasting is that you can create any answer you want by simply using bad assumptions. and that works both ways ,you’re making bad assumptions because you hate Donald Trump, and everything about him. You can’t see the forest for the trees. The truth is nobody knows how this is gonna turn out with certainty. Nobody. As I’ve always said, give it time and see what happens.. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by MnSpring on 04/03/25 at 07:37:22 "... It's like trying to teach a squirrel to play chess ..." Is that the same as trying to teach a Muppet that guns save lives ? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/03/25 at 08:55:43 625E435B4653446657435A360 wrote:
You're right Paul, the earliest report I saw didn't mention that At least it's a baby step :-? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/03/25 at 10:41:26 I think it is mainly an attack on Europe. By levying 54% on China, China will focus on the European maket and we know what the consequences are. And at the same time Europe will have a harder time selling its products in America. What Trump is doing now has never been done before. It is speculation what the effect will be. What is clear is that every citizen will get a view of how the world economy works. And that the hidden structure of the financial world will become visible to everyone. It clearly has a function if you look at it from the point of view of spiritual development of humanity. And let's be honest, you can't take your couch upstairs with you, so there must be a good reason why we walk around here in the world. One thing is certain, left-wing ideology is not a sign of spirituality. If you look at Doge, it turns out that the vast majority of fraud in the government comes from the left. So they will fight hard. If it happens that they can cripple the trump administration then america is minced meat. The left will never tackle government spending. Musk got the astronauts out of space and there was no news about it. That is a sign of how wrong the people who still hold a large portion of power are.. Trump is doing well. MAGA: Reunite the United States. (In case you still think America is great). |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/03/25 at 11:40:10 293625363D363D3621343A36530 wrote:
Wrong... the vast majority of fraud comes from military spending, which won't be touched |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/03/25 at 11:50:15 Bingo. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/03/25 at 13:43:05 That's right the f35 program alone has cost $1.7 trillion and we're taking food from the hungry |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/03/25 at 14:47:59 Defense is a no go, but if you tackle the waste of the government, at some point you also tackle defense because the tax money goes to defense and a healthy government checks its expenses. Up until now, defense can get away with not being accountable. So what Trump is doing is very beneficial. Up until now, you had presidents who were corrupt themselves and made big problems even bigger. Trump is going completely against this. His policy makes a lot of people very nervous. I dare say that defense has more power over the government than the other way around. The three large infestation companies.... ehhh sorry investment companies that I will call Blackrock for convenience are actually weapons manufacturers that determine where and when there is war. They also oversee all other financial transactions, including cash withdrawals at the cash register. They buy up all the houses in America. Trump was able to become president because they allowed it. Defense can never be tackled by a president but a healthy government can. The bigger the man the bigger the fall. If the financial world were to focus on the heart that would bring about an enormous revolution. Trump is at the base of this revolution even though you wouldn't say so. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by ThumperPaul on 04/04/25 at 06:21:34 Zevenenergie - if you keep blabbering and mocking long enough, something intelligent might come out eventually. The ever popular and ignorant, “Nobody Knows” argument…. We’ve done the mass tariff thing 3 times in American history. 1828, 1930, and 2025 All spaced out about 100 years apart because everyone who remembers the last one needs to be dead for the next one to happen. The last 2 caused a depression. I hope this one makes us rich though. My disgust for Trump as a human being is irrelevant. I’ll fully support good policies if he has any. The problem with people that have a giant hard-on for Trump is that they can’t evaluate things clearly in an objective manner. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/04/25 at 09:51:39 My heart never deceives me. I see very clearly. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/04/25 at 10:47:10 Tariffs contributed to, but definitely did not cause the Great Depression and the circumstances between now and then are vastly different. You remind me of that dude on Good Wil Hinting trying to pick up girls by impressing them with phrases he picked up from reading a book or two. I don’t have a hard-on for Trump, I wish he’d never ran again. But he stands so much further above those idiots currently occupying the Democratic Party leadership, there’s no option. Let’s just wait and see on the tariffs. All those countries need the American market, they cannot survive without us. Do you really think we’re going to miss anything from Canada? I saw a video of Canadian liquor stores, pulling Makers Mark, and Jack Daniels off the shelves. But you know they sold that crap on eBay the next day. There’s no way they’re gonna do without Kentucky Bourbon. They’ll find a way to get it or they’ll pay for it. They’ll be a combination of recessions. We’ll lower some of the tariffs, and they’ll lower some of their tariffs on us. US manufacturing will pick up some business which help the US economy which will contribute to the world’s economy. The bottom line is the tariffs some nations have been charging us isn’t fair, and we never should’ve allowed it to begin with. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by ThumperPaul on 04/04/25 at 11:16:53 That’s cute Mark. In reality, I’m actually dumbing down my comments for some readers. Since there is no interest is acknowledging anything that I’ve said has merit, I’m done wasting my breath. Stock markets tanking. Notable economists providing dark views. History shows what happens. Manufacturing jobs? Robotics and automation are the future. “Not Fair” - whining 3 year old toddler logic. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/04/25 at 12:17:04 I would love some intelligent reactions from left-wingers But most of the time they don't get any further than bad trump or personal attacks. And I don't see you doing much else, it's just a bit more sneaky and unsimpatic. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by ThumperPaul on 04/04/25 at 13:20:52 233C2F3C373C373C2B3E303C590 wrote:
You’re not interested in intelligent dialogue. You just want to pontificate your arrogant view of the world (which is mostly convoluted crap). Not that I need to explain myself, but …. I’m not a left winger and I actually voted for Trump despite my disgust for him as a human being as actions as President the 1st go round. Somehow I surmised he was the lesser of two evils (different wings of the same dirty bird). But I’m not going to give the guy a free pass when I have an educated belief that he is implementing destructive policies. My view is shared by many with knowledge on the subject. Trump loyalists are so blind to bad policy. At least there are some GOP Congress people now standing up and trying to pass legislation to address tariffs. There’s hope this terribly bad mass tariff madness ends sooner than later. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/04/25 at 13:33:01 Bottom line, Trump still doesn't know how tariffs work and he has no one to tell him he's wrong And most MAGAs don't understand either |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/04/25 at 13:40:14 093528302D382F0D3C28315D0 wrote:
|
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/04/25 at 13:54:10 594F58455D48455E2A0 wrote:
What a stupid comment. Of course Trump knows how tariffs work, as I do, as you do, as everyone does. If tariffs didn’t work genius, why are other countries imposing tariffs on us? Answer that. Of course tariffs work. The question is will tariffs work for us in the circumstances we’re in now. That’s unknown right now. Will they force other countries to negotiate and lower their tariffs to us in return for a lower tariff from us? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/04/25 at 13:55:12 That you call my view “convoluted crap” says more about your style of discussion than the content. It is okay to disagree, but if you truly believe in intelligent dialogue, mutual respect is a minimum requirement. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by MnSpring on 04/04/25 at 14:09:57 5569746C7164735160746D010 wrote:
OH, you are just starting that, now ? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by ThumperPaul on 04/04/25 at 14:20:04 6744795A5843444D2A0 wrote:
OH, you are just starting that, now ?[/quote] NO, I’ve been doing it for people like you for decades. It still doesn’t help in your case though. So I’ll stop. Go play your broken record. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/04/25 at 15:56:00 This nuts is not gonna look good at the pearly gates bro. Looks like your having one of your breakdowns again. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/05/25 at 05:32:50 734F524A5742557746524B270 wrote:
OH, you are just starting that, now ?[/quote] NO, I’ve been doing it for people like you for decades. It still doesn’t help in your case though. So I’ll stop. Go play your broken record. [/quote] You’ll be back. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ukfNXFgUEiU&pp=ygUXeW91J2xsIGJlIGJhY2sgaGFtaWx0b24%3D |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/05/25 at 09:34:07 He's crashing the world and doesn't know what a tariff is Not qualified :-? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by MnSpring on 04/05/25 at 17:14:55 6472657860757863170 wrote:
And AGAIN, which DFI, FDS, WOKE, UL Socialistic, ''news site", said that ? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by MnSpring on 04/05/25 at 17:21:05 "Oh Oh Oh" (car 54 where are you) How's that tree hugging, (Before the Climate Change DFI's), "Save a Tree, Use a Plastic Bag". Going ?????" |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by thumperclone on 04/06/25 at 03:38:05 And AGAIN, which DFI, FDS, WOKE, UL Socialistic, ''news site", said that ? [/quote] who told you to say that? a mag nut job fake news site.. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/06/25 at 05:20:00 382E39243C29243F4B0 wrote:
Why do you keep saying that? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by thumperclone on 04/06/25 at 06:05:05 can't you see what's happening? stock market is in a tailspin I've lost 2 years' worth of gains in my 401k in a week |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/07/25 at 04:44:54 I’ll ask again, if tariffs are so bad they destroy a nation’s economy, why do so many countries impose them on us? From AI: As of December 31, 2024, specific tariffs on U.S. agricultural goods vary by country, often influenced by trade agreements, retaliatory measures, and national policies. While I don’t have an exhaustive, up-to-the-minute database of every country's tariffs as of that exact date, I can provide a detailed snapshot based on available data and trends up to that point, leveraging my tools to reflect the situation as accurately as possible for April 7, 2025, with knowledge extending through late 2024. Below is a list of tariffs imposed by key countries on U.S. agricultural goods as of December 31, 2024, focusing on major trading partners and notable retaliatory actions. Note that tariffs can fluctuate due to ongoing trade negotiations or disputes, and some rates may reflect retaliatory measures from earlier U.S. tariff policies. ### Key Countries and Tariffs on U.S. Agricultural Goods (as of 12/31/24): 1. **China** - **Soybeans**: 25% (retaliatory tariff from 2018, maintained through 2024 despite Phase One Agreement waivers). - **Pork**: 25% (retaliatory, with additional 10% in some cases). - **Corn**: 15% (imposed in 2024 as tensions rose). - **Wheat**: 15% (escalated in late 2024). - **Cotton**: 15% (added in 2024 retaliatory measures). - **Context**: China, the largest market for U.S. agricultural exports, has kept retaliatory tariffs from the 2018 trade war largely intact, with adjustments in 2024 reflecting renewed U.S.-China trade friction. The Phase One Agreement (2020) saw temporary waivers, but by late 2024, these were scaled back. 2. **Canada** - **Dairy Products (e.g., butter, cheese)**: Near 300% (under supply management system, not retaliatory but standard protection; USMCA limits U.S. access via quotas). - **Prepared Foods (e.g., coffee, orange juice)**: 10% (retaliatory from 2018, maintained in some form through 2024). - **Context**: Canada’s tariffs on U.S. agriculture under USMCA allow duty-free access for compliant goods, but high tariffs persist on over-quota dairy and retaliatory measures linger from earlier disputes. 3. **Mexico** - **Pork**: 20% (retaliatory, adjusted from 15-25% range in 2018-2024). - **Fruits (fresh/processed)**: 20% (retaliatory, maintained through 2024). - **Processed Vegetables**: 25% (retaliatory, escalated in 2024). - **Context**: Mexico, a top U.S. agricultural export market, has used retaliatory tariffs sporadically since 2018, with 2024 rates reflecting responses to U.S. steel/aluminum tariffs and border policy disputes. 4. **European Union (EU)** - **Dairy**: 50% (standard high tariffs on U.S. dairy, plus occasional retaliatory increases). - **Corn**: 25% (retaliatory from 2018, sustained in 2024). - **Whiskey (often tied to agricultural inputs)**: 25% (retaliatory, ongoing from 2018). - **Context**: The EU imposes high baseline tariffs on agricultural goods, augmented by retaliatory tariffs from U.S. Section 232 actions. By 2024, these remain in place amid stalled negotiations. 5. **India** - **Agricultural Products (general)**: Up to 100% (e.g., on pulses, nuts; standard protectionist policy, not solely retaliatory). - **Tree Nuts (e.g., almonds)**: 30-100% (specific rates vary, retaliatory hikes from 2019 maintained). - **Context**: India’s high tariffs predate U.S. actions but were raised on specific U.S. goods like almonds in retaliation to U.S. steel tariffs, with no significant reduction by 2024. 6. **Turkey** - **Tree Nuts**: 10-70% (retaliatory, doubled in 2018, adjusted back down by 2024 but still elevated). - **Rice**: 25% (retaliatory, sustained through 2024). - **Context**: Turkey’s tariffs spiked in response to U.S. metal tariffs and have remained a tool in trade disputes, affecting U.S. agricultural exports. 7. **Japan** - **Rice**: 700% (standard protectionist tariff, not retaliatory; U.S. exports minimal due to quotas). - **Beef**: 38.5% (outside U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement quotas, unchanged in 2024). - **Context**: Japan’s tariffs on U.S. agriculture are moderated by the 2019 U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement, but high rates persist on sensitive products like rice. 8. **South Korea** - **Agricultural Products (average)**: 79% (standard rate on sensitive goods, moderated by KORUS FTA for U.S. exports). - **Rice**: Over 100% (outside quotas, no significant U.S. exports). - **Context**: The KORUS FTA keeps most U.S. agricultural goods at 0% tariff, but high rates apply to over-quota or non-FTA items. ### Notes: - **Trade Agreements**: Countries with Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) like Canada, Mexico (USMCA), and South Korea (KORUS) allow most U.S. agricultural goods duty-free access within quotas, but retaliatory or over-quota tariffs apply outside these frameworks. - **Retaliatory Tariffs**: Many tariffs stem from U.S. actions under Sections 232 and 301 (e.g., steel/aluminum, China trade war), with countries targeting U.S. agriculture to inflict political pressure. - **Data Gaps**: Exact rates for every country and product as of 12/31/24 are subject to last-minute changes (e.g., negotiations or new disputes). This list reflects the most consistent data through late 2024. - **Global Average**: The global trade-weighted average tariff on agricultural goods is around 10%, but U.S. exports face higher rates in protectionist or retaliating markets. For a more precise tariff on a specific product or country not listed, additional real-time data beyond my current scope would be needed. Would you like me to dig deeper into a particular country or product? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Eegore on 04/07/25 at 05:35:55 I’ll ask again, if tariffs are so bad they destroy a nation’s economy, why do so many countries impose them on us? Because each tariff on each product impacts each economy differently. Some tariffs are good for the US, some are not. This blanket approach seems to me, and this is an opinion for anyone incapable of understanding what an opinion is, is designed to force the hand on a lot of WTO related agreements. It won't hurt anyone who makes decisions as they are so far detached from the average consumer's financial status, so the "hurt" is practically nonexistent for them This is an opinion. My opinion is that working all these trades independently will never be efficient enough, so this is the step needed to get some long-standing trade agreements adjusted quickly. Also it makes Trump feel good seeing the planet react to him. This is my opinion. This post is an opinion. The previous sentence indicates this post is an opinion. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/07/25 at 06:58:34 Have you ever heard of a drinking game? You take a drink every time somebody says a certain word. If we played a drinking game where every time you wrote the word opinion, we would die of alcohol poisoning. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Eegore on 04/07/25 at 07:08:34 I don't see it unless I go back and look at the post externally. It's ok though, if the system doesn't add it in, MnSpring will make sure everyone knows when I have an opinion. This is an opinion. The previous sentence indicates this post is an opinion. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/07/25 at 07:40:11 Burb. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by MnSpring on 04/07/25 at 08:43:49 182A2D3C3B2A3D022E3D244F0 wrote:
WOW that. 'AI' summery sure does sound/read, like some of Eegore's posts ! (well except for the; 'I have an opinion. This is an opinion. The previous sentence indicates this post is an opinion') |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by WebsterMark on 04/07/25 at 09:39:04 4C6C6E667B6C090 wrote:
darn!t….three more shots! I’m ripped! |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by zevenenergie on 04/07/25 at 10:24:16 Egore was Russian in a previous incarnation. He is very happy to be living in America now. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Eegore on 04/07/25 at 11:22:35 WOW that. 'AI' summery sure does sound/read, like some of Eegore's posts ! (well except for the; 'I have an opinion. This is an opinion. The previous sentence indicates this post is an opinion') AI should sound much better than anything I post. My opinion is AI should sound much better than anything I post. This post is an opinion. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Eegore on 04/07/25 at 11:24:46 darn!t….three more shots! I’m ripped! It was really bad the first time, I didn't realize it was repeating the "Opinion" definition in full multiple times. It might get out of hand again, but it seems much more toned down this time around. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/07/25 at 12:38:12 Let's just make it a given that every post on here is an opinion Except mine ;D |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by MnSpring on 04/07/25 at 12:43:27 4767656D7067020 wrote:
Who, or what, is. 'IT' ? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by MnSpring on 04/07/25 at 12:56:51 6177607D65707D66120 wrote:
Not everything said here is a 'opinion'. Many times, a FACT is stated. Like the FACT, that 2+2=4. (Only DFI, UL, WOKE, FDS Socialists can say: 2+2 can sometimes = 3 or 5, just depends on how/when/where, the 'problem' was solved, and if Bernie, AOC, Kama-la, CNN [along with others], was involved) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Eegore on 04/07/25 at 13:00:17 Who, or what, is. 'IT' ? Software. "It" will input clarifications like opinion and then learn. Slowly given how little is said here, but still, "It" is doing better it seems. My opinion is "It" is doing better it seems. The previous sentence indicates an opinion. EDIT: Another example is the quotations. The software will take my inflection and cadence of speech and decide where quotes are used. I paused .25% or more per statement over my average so the quotes were inserted automatically. |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Serowbot on 04/07/25 at 16:07:12 4A695477756E6960070 wrote:
Not everything said here is a 'opinion'. Many times, a FACT is stated. Like the FACT, that 2+2=4. (Only DFI, UL, WOKE, FDS Socialists can say: 2+2 can sometimes = 3 or 5, just depends on how/when/where, the 'problem' was solved, and if Bernie, AOC, Kama-la, CNN [along with others], was involved) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D [/quote] That would be your opinion |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by MnSpring on 04/07/25 at 17:24:16 5C4A5D40584D405B2F0 wrote:
What ? It is a, 'opinion', that 2+2=4 ??????? |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by thumperclone on 04/07/25 at 17:34:59 [quote if Bernie, AOC, Kama-la, CNN [along with others], was involved)[/size][/i] you were told to say that |
|
Title: Re: dementia setting in Post by Eegore on 04/07/25 at 17:46:03 What ? It is a, 'opinion', that 2+2=4 ??????? I would say that is your opinion that he meant it that way. That is my opinion. This post is an opinion. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |