SuzukiSavage.com - Print Page

SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> No "WARRANT" needed for masks
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1750163485

Message started by Eegore on 06/17/25 at 05:31:25

Title: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by Eegore on 06/17/25 at 05:31:25

CA is proposing a law to prohibit law enforcement from wearing masks on duty.

If there is already a law requiring a "WARRANT" then why is CA proposing these laws? Why is there no mention of the current WARRANT requirements?

http://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1749410695/11

Non-MAGA website references that will probably be called MAGA FAKE websites anyway:

https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/senators-wiener-arreguin-announce-legislation-prohibit-local-state-federal-law-enforcement#:~:text=SAN%20FRANCISCO%20%E2%80%93%20Senators%20Scott%20Wiener,in%20the%20state%20of%20California.

https://nypost.com/2025/06/17/us-news/california-dems-propose-legislation-to-ban-face-masks-for-law-enforcement-officers-and-not-protesters-or-criminals/

https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/california-no-secret-police-act-introduced-sb627-ban-police-face-covering-wiener-arreguin/

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-06-16/new-bill-would-ban-law-enforcement-from-wearing-masks

Title: Re: No "WARRANT" needed for masks
Post by zevenenergie on 06/17/25 at 05:42:22

California Dems Propose Legislation to Ban Face Masks for Law Enforcement Officers — and Not Protesters or Criminals

Yeah, that makes it easier to spot protesters and criminals, so that's a smart move. ;)

Those poor Democrats still don't understand why they weren't re-elected.

Democrats:
I think we should see it this way. As long as everyone behaves according to the law, you don't need the police.

As soon as everyone obeys the law, you don't need the law. 8-)

This to show how much money you can save as a government if you provide good information to the public.