|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Deceptive editing costs /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1751440687 Message started by JOG on 07/02/25 at 00:18:07 |
|
Title: Deceptive editing costs Post by JOG on 07/02/25 at 00:18:07 Excerpt Trump will receive $16 million upfront. This will cover legal fees, costs of the case, and contributions to his library or charitable causes, to be determined at Trump’s discretion. There is an expectation that there will be another allocation in the mid-eight figures set aside for advertisements, public service announcements, or other similar transmissions, in support of conservative causes by the network, Fox News Digital has learned. Sources close to the situation told Fox News Digital that CBS has agreed to update its editorial standards to install a mandatory new rule. Going forward, the network will promptly release full, unedited transcripts of future presidential candidates’ interviews. People involved in the settlement talks have referred to this as the “Trump Rule.” https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/breaking-cbs-paramount-forced-pay-trump-massive-8/ Takeaway? She is such a frikken moron they had to cheat for her to hide some of her stupidity |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by zevenenergie on 07/02/25 at 01:04:42 That the Democrats couldn't find anyone better than Biden and Harris still amazes me. It seems like they deliberately did want to lose the election. Or that they thought that spending a huge amount of money on the election campaign would get it done. I don't know. I can,t get my head around it. In any case, 60 minutes also saw that Harris was totally unsuitable for the job. It could very well be that the democrats will never come to power again and honestly that seems like a very good thing to me. The whole party needs to be changed, but I don't think they can do that in four years, because you also need quality for that, and it,s not there. Lets look at it again...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmNN5A5MgMA Or better let,s not. Oh my god, what were they thinking? It,s crazy to me. And that we had to discuss it at the time...no wonder we no longer take the left-oriented seriously. darn. If they had put all the energy they put into preventing Trump from becoming president into finding a good presidential candidate with a good team around him, they would have won the election with flying colors. I wonder what kind of kitchen mop they will come up with next. Serobot, does this answer your question you asked me a few days ago? |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by thumperclone on 07/02/25 at 03:38:26 blatant attack on the 1st amendment |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by WebsterMark on 07/02/25 at 03:52:53 The $64,000 question, for CBS in this case, the $30 million question, will it essentially force main stream media outlets to seek out and hire outside of their liberal bubble? I don’t think so. |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by WebsterMark on 07/02/25 at 04:02:24 3B273A223F2A3D2C2320212A4F0 wrote:
Yet another succinct and to the point yet incorrect understanding of what happened. The “attack” on the first amendment has been media companies essentially becoming an active member of The Democratic Party for decades. They know they are guilty, which is why they paid up. And it’s not really an attack on the first amendment. “The Press”enjoys certain liberties and in return for that, there’s certain expectations, which they clearly have not lived up to. They’ve not kept up their end of the bargain. They don’t even pretend to be unbiased anymore so maybe this finding will give them pause to think about the importance of their role in society….. but it won’t. These are people who looked right at us and lied to our faces for years. This saying exists for a reason, a leopard can’t change its spots…. |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by JOG on 07/02/25 at 07:05:22 2D312C34293C2B3A3536373C590 wrote:
No,,it's holding them accountable for fraud. |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by MnSpring on 07/02/25 at 07:48:00 574B564E534651404F4C4D46230 wrote:
Which was CLEARLY done by CBS. |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by zevenenergie on 07/02/25 at 07:56:27 I am also relieved that this kind of election fraud is finally being stopped. The Democrats have violated democracy to the core and not just in the last election. To me it is a sign that humanity has not completely gone astray jet. |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by thumperclone on 07/02/25 at 08:33:17 7F4A59415A5D594A5C380 wrote:
No,,it's holding them accountable for fraud. [/quote] yea and gas is $1.99 |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by WebsterMark on 07/02/25 at 09:30:44 677B667E637661707F7C7D76130 wrote:
No,,it's holding them accountable for fraud. [/quote] yea and gas is $1.99 [/quote] I think I know the answer to this, but have you ever watch the two clips side-by-side to see the difference? |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by Serowbot on 07/02/25 at 12:23:14 He won the election... so where are his damages? This is not a judgement it's a settlement There are clips of Faux doing the same with Trump Faux is on the hook for $750M for deception The sound of crickets is so soothing |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by WebsterMark on 07/02/25 at 13:08:23 Fox edited (pieced together) answers from multiple questions and presented them as his answer to a question? I’ll ask you the same question. Did you watch both versions? |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by zevenenergie on 07/02/25 at 14:11:45 Were can I find them? |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by Needles on 07/02/25 at 14:59:59 Since CBS has twice the net worth of 47, even counting his crypto, the $16 mil is "STFU" money. He's punching above his weight, if nothing else. |
|
Title: Re: Deceptive editing costs Post by Eegore on 07/02/25 at 16:52:05 The $64,000 question, for CBS in this case, the $30 million question, will it essentially force main stream media outlets to seek out and hire outside of their liberal bubble? As much as the same thing would essentially force main stream Conservative media to seek out and hire outside of their conservative bubble. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |