SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl
General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Colbert
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1752848986

Message started by MnSpring on 07/18/25 at 07:29:46

Title: Colbert
Post by MnSpring on 07/18/25 at 07:29:46

   Did CBS finally, 
get tired of Colbert's
       T.D.S. ?

   (This is a OPINION)

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Serowbot on 07/18/25 at 08:12:55

That's not an opinion, it's a question  :-?

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by thumperclone on 07/18/25 at 08:51:27


6744795A5843444D2A0 wrote:
   Did CBS finally, 
get tired of Colbert's
       T.D.S. ?

   (This is a OPINION)

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
 and you b1tch about the liberal media!
CBS claims it was a finacial decision

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by JOG on 07/18/25 at 14:51:05


2C302D35283D2A3B3437363D580 wrote:
[quote author=6744795A5843444D2A0 link=1752848986/0#0 date=1752848986]    Did CBS finally, 
get tired of Colbert's
       T.D.S. ?

   (This is a OPINION)

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
 and you b1tch about the liberal media!
CBS claims it was a finacial decision
[/quote]

It's a FINANCIAL decision Because he sux and has No FUKKING Audience.
Viewers Determine the longevity of the program.
You needed the explanation.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by thumperclone on 07/18/25 at 15:11:21

CBS called him "irreplaceable"

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by JOG on 07/18/25 at 15:19:40

CBS said it was “purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night,” adding, “It is not related in any way to the show’s performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount.”

If the Show was MAKING MONEY, he would still be there.. Unless you Believe an Eeevill Corporation would Shut Down a Profit making part of the corporation.
You Can Grasp reality, can't you?

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Eegore on 07/18/25 at 17:13:55


 I like how we can't trust anything CBS says until they something we want to be true.

 We also can somehow trust CBS, until they say something we do not want to be true.

 

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by JOG on 07/18/25 at 17:24:56

You are a real piece of work. You manage to twist things,, and WHY? It's almost as If you don't Want those leftards to actually understand the reality of how BUSINESS WORKS. DaFuq is wrong with you? CBS lied.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Eegore on 07/18/25 at 20:10:01


You are a real piece of work. You manage to twist things,, and WHY? It's almost as If you don't Want those leftards to actually understand the reality of how BUSINESS WORKS. DaFuq is wrong with you? CBS lied.


 And they aren't lying now?

 My point is CBS was a bunch of liars, until they said Colbert was a financial decision in exclusivity, now they are honest.  That's convenient.

  I don't think CBS will say anything that isn't in their best interests.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by WebsterMark on 07/19/25 at 05:21:49

It could simply be there’s just not a big enough audience of liberals to watch that many late night political shows.

You’ve got three essentially identical political talk shows on at the same time. Plus remember that MSNBC and CNN have their late night shows as well so network TV and cable are all competing over the same group.

Conservatives don’t have any shows on network TV so Fox talk shows on cable have no competition.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by thumperclone on 07/19/25 at 07:17:52

wonder if their recent lawsuit has anything to do with this
the taco FELONS' hate for Colbert is well known

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Needles on 07/19/25 at 08:21:51

There is no liberal media, at least not the way MAGATs want it to be. It's all CORPORATE media, and it's tailored to whichever audience it thinks will make it the most money. The corporations all support the current administration, even the Peter Principle administration headed by Don TACO with dementia.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by WebsterMark on 07/20/25 at 05:45:27


697568706D786F7E717273781D0 wrote:
wonder if their recent lawsuit has anything to do with this
the taco FELONS' hate for Colbert is well known


Probably or at least one of the reasons for the cancellation is likely due to the fallout from CBS editing that Kamala clip.  

All the late night talk shows are in jeopardy. Not just because they have evolved in Democratic Party talking points, but because the landscape is changing and businesses that supply the demand are forced to adjust.

Again , they’re finding out it’s not a good business model anymore to figure you can thrive appealing to the small percentage of people who watch those shows and then whatever percentage of that number who are liberals.

SNL still survives because the base number is larger and they are younger and more likely to have not experienced enliven to firm up political ideology, but that won’t last. To be fair, SNL dips its toes into the other pool from time to time and invites more conservative entertainers and politicians on.

As has been said many times and is a great way to view politics, liberals are children, conservatives are adults.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by thumperclone on 07/20/25 at 06:51:08



As has been said many times and is a great way to view politics, liberals are children, conservatives are adults.[/quote]

your FELONIST liar in chief is a perfect example of conservative adulthood

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by MnSpring on 07/20/25 at 07:32:21

"As has been said many times and is a great way to view politics,

liberals are children, conservatives are adults."


  So true.

And more now because,
they are fueled by, "entitlement".
They have no idea what work is.
They are just, 'given' things.


Title: Re: Colbert
Post by MnSpring on 07/20/25 at 08:12:21


4464666E7364010 wrote:
   I like how we can't trust anything CBS says until they something we want to be true.
 We also can somehow trust CBS, until they say something we do not want to be true.
 


After many years of LYING, CBS got Caught, and PUNISHED !!!!!

Now they realize that, SPINNING the truth in news, has to be more carefully controlled.

The Colbert thing was not worth Lying.
They simply told the truth of not making them enough money.











Title: Re: Colbert
Post by WebsterMark on 07/20/25 at 08:49:24

The reality is, and why our two party system has resulted in our prosperity, is both sides must have the other for the system as a whole to thrive. It’s also the reason why the majority of the media abdicating its responsibility and going all in on one party, it’s so bad for the country.

Without liberals, conservatives would not evolve and gradually lose out as situations change and they are too slow to adjust. Without conservatives, liberals would destroy themselves by chasing every shiny nickel they see out of the corner of their eyes.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Needles on 07/20/25 at 09:17:42

MAGATs don't flinch when Dementia Don TACO lies; why should they care when anyone, including the media, lies? CBS did NOT lie. They're just another @ss kissing corporate sycophant. Oh, and it is obvious that the Founding Fathers meant AT LEAST two parties, not ONLY two parties. If it were not for the screwed up way elections are funded here, We the People would have real choices. All elections should be publicly funded, with caps on spending. If they go over the cap, they're off the ballot. Elections should be banned from the media until 6 months before election day. That would force ALL politicians to cut the BS present themselves and their plans for governing, and leave very little room for mud slinging. PACs and corporate lobbying should be made illegal. All they are is bribery, anyway.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by MnSpring on 07/20/25 at 11:23:57


0B202021292036450 wrote:
"...  Founding Fathers meant AT LEAST two parties, not ONLY two parties. ..."


Golly Gee Wally !!!

"... The Socialist Party of the United States of America (also Socialist Party USA or SPUSA) is a socialist political party in the United States. SPUSA formed in 1973, one year after the Socialist Party of America splintered into three: Social Democrats, USA (legal successor); the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee (split); and SPUSA.  ..."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_USA


What, not enough DFI Socialist Party's ?????

;D
;D
;D
;D
;D
;D ;D ;D ;D





Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Needles on 07/20/25 at 11:30:30

You DO know that anybody can modify a Wikipedia entry, right?

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Eegore on 07/20/25 at 14:00:09


You DO know that anybody can modify a Wikipedia entry, right?

 To be fair anybody can type up a Reddit post and you use those as reference.  The difference is at least Wikipedia has global input and vandalism bots.  Surprisingly enough Wikipedia defied all odds and didn't turn into a complete disaster.

 There are still much better references though.  

 

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by JOG on 07/20/25 at 14:41:05


1239393830392F5C0 wrote:
MAGATs don't flinch when Dementia Don TACO lies; why should they care when anyone, including the media, lies? CBS did NOT lie. They're just another @ss kissing corporate sycophant. Oh, and it is obvious that the Founding Fathers meant AT LEAST two parties, not ONLY two parties. If it were not for the screwed up way elections are funded here, We the People would have real choices. All elections should be publicly funded, with caps on spending. If they go over the cap, they're off the ballot. Elections should be banned from the media until 6 months before election day. That would force ALL politicians to cut the BS present themselves and their plans for governing, and leave very little room for mud slinging. PACs and corporate lobbying should be made illegal. All they are is bribery, anyway.


CBS did NOT lie.

Sure they did. OR, you Believe a GREEDY CORPORATION would Shut Down a Profitable part of the corporation.
You need duct tape around your head right now.


Title: Re: Colbert
Post by JOG on 07/20/25 at 15:45:14

Search

colbert losing 20 million

Check out the Number of Reports that state how much Colbert was LOSING Every YEAR.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Needles on 07/20/25 at 18:24:41

As the cable companies were schooled, back in the 1980s, MONEY YOU THOUGHT YOU SHOULD MAKE AND DIDN'T IS NOT A BUSINESS "LOSS".

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by JOG on 07/20/25 at 19:14:55

Fukkin Leftards...[ch128514][ch128514][ch128514][ch128514][ch128514][ch128514]
Morons

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Needles on 07/20/25 at 19:24:29

Lost again, eh, JOG?

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by JOG on 07/20/25 at 19:30:23

No,you poor Stewpid fukk,,you can pretend Colbert was a money making operation,, or act like Corporations don't mind losing 40 million dollars a year.. Whatever, dude,,

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Needles on 07/21/25 at 06:55:16

I rest my case. ;D

They didn't LOSE anything. They just didn't MAKE what their financial dept predicted they should. I know that's hard for MAGATs to get their heads around, but you actually have to THINK some, i.e., put in some effort mentally. They actually MADE $1.2 billion last year.

https://compworth.com/company/cbs-corporation

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by thumperclone on 07/21/25 at 07:44:58

highest rated show in its time slot

viewing tastes are changing


Title: Re: Colbert
Post by JOG on 07/21/25 at 08:55:01

Okay,, a corporation that was making money from this alleged comic shut down his show, in Spite of the Fact that HE WAS GENERATING PROFITS.
You know that is not true. His ratings went to crap.
He failed to maintain a large enough audience to make his show valuable.
He got canned,because he's not funny.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by thumperclone on 07/21/25 at 09:44:30


1124372F3433372432560 wrote:
No,you poor Stewpid fukk,,you can pretend Colbert was a money making operation,, or act like Corporations don't mind losing 40 million dollars a year.. Whatever, dude,,


lil upset baby man?
just like your liar in chief FELON

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Needles on 07/21/25 at 09:54:35


271201190205011204600 wrote:
Okay,, a corporation that was making money from this alleged comic shut down his show, in Spite of the Fact that HE WAS GENERATING PROFITS.
You know that is not true. His ratings went to crap.
He failed to maintain a large enough audience to make his show valuable.
He got canned,because he's not funny.



Highest ratings in the time slot. Try again. You're information sources are sh*t.

;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by thumperclone on 07/21/25 at 11:49:14

highest rated show in its time slot

taken from TV INSIDER



Title: Re: Colbert
Post by WebsterMark on 07/22/25 at 05:51:14

Might have had the highest ratings but doesn’t mean he was making them money. And yes, the lawsuit from Trump and the settlement probably had an impact.

Remember, Tucker Carlson was number me in his time slot by a mile when he was fired. Fox never said but text messages criticizing management during the voting machine lawsuit might have played a role.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Eegore on 07/22/25 at 06:42:47


Might have had the highest ratings but doesn’t mean he was making them money. And yes, the lawsuit from Trump and the settlement probably had an impact.

Remember, Tucker Carlson was number me in his time slot by a mile when he was fired. Fox never said but text messages criticizing management during the voting machine lawsuit might have played a role.



 Ok that's enough with the equal and realistic assessments.  This forum has no tolerance for such logic.  It's either Trump's fault or it's not - nothing that happens anywhere contains multiple variables.  To be fair if it's not Trump's fault, it is Biden's - but that's all you get.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by Needles on 07/22/25 at 08:16:52

Most people fired "without cause" are hit with made-up causes as soon as they challenge it. Corporations are evil. If they were people, they would be tried, found guilty, and at least go to prison.

Title: Re: Colbert
Post by MnSpring on 07/22/25 at 10:45:48


446F6F6E666F790A0 wrote:
Most people fired "without cause" are hit with made-up causes as soon as they challenge it. Corporations are evil. If they were people, they would be tried, found guilty, and at least go to prison.


So Colbert should Sue ?

Or he can't because,
CBS is a 'Corporation' ?

"...If they were people,
they would be tried,
found guilty..."





Title: Re: Colbert
Post by JOG on 07/22/25 at 14:28:06

Well, which is it? Colbert was a profit center, making money for the corporation and shut down in Spite of being exactly what corporations WANT from their employees,, A PROFIT,
Or
They were losing money On HIS Show?
The corporate Total Profits don't say anything about HIS TIME SLOT.
Did YOU watch his show? How often?
Me? I was done with him twenty years ago. I thought his ability to tuck his ear inside itself was his most humorous thing.

SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.