|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Ship them in to the rallies /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1755140788 Message started by JOG on 08/13/25 at 20:06:28 |
|
Title: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/13/25 at 20:06:28 Pay them to protest Aaand we can Only conclude Leftards are the majority Even though Trump won the popular vote. https://wltreport.com/2025/08/13/400-increase-reported-company-that-provides-paid-protesters/?utm_source=newsletter_ssp https://wltreport.com/2025/08/13/400-increase-reported-company-that-provides-paid-protesters/?utm_source=newsletter_ssp |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by thumperclone on 08/14/25 at 06:49:00 protesting against the fascist FELON is a good thing our democracy is being eroded by his authoritian actions |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by MnSpring on 08/14/25 at 07:20:17 "protesting" a thing that is a right of this great Nation. Paying thugs, paying people to shout, TDS things. Free transportation, food, etc, to highlight a political position which the MAJORITY do NOT agree to. Is democracy being eroded !!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by thumperclone on 08/14/25 at 07:41:39 the MAJORITY is anti fascism (read anti tRump) |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by WebsterMark on 08/14/25 at 07:49:58 7569746C716473626D6E6F64010 wrote:
Trump would be reelected by larger margins if he ran again next week. Normal people understand what fascism is, they understand when government overreach is at that level. Normal people recognize this current presidential administration, and honestly no presidential ministration before it, meets the definition. Only lunatics think that. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by thumperclone on 08/14/25 at 10:02:27 the only lunatics are your fascist FELON and his followers |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by MnSpring on 08/14/25 at 10:26:08 Their is a, 'vaccine', for many illnesses. This Nation needs a 'Vaccine' for TDS, so people can see clearly. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Serowbot on 08/14/25 at 10:55:22 1B380526243F3831560 wrote:
It does, but I doubt if you'd take it |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by WebsterMark on 08/14/25 at 11:13:00 534F524A574255444B484942270 wrote:
That’s like saying, I know you are, what am I?. What are you, 12? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Serowbot on 08/14/25 at 12:02:14 Trump has the lowest approval rating since.... ... Trump :-? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by MnSpring on 08/14/25 at 12:31:15 4553445941545942360 wrote:
I don't need to take it. I do NOT have the, 'DFI Socialist, FDS, WOKE', malady. I can see clearly !!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by WebsterMark on 08/14/25 at 15:46:41 4553445941545942360 wrote:
And yet he was never going to win….yet he did….twice. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/14/25 at 22:37:58 7A667B637E6B7C6D6261606B0E0 wrote:
If that was True, nobody would NEED to be PAID to protest. But,that is logical and reasonable, therefore, beyond your grasp. You Label Trump fascist.And the definition is not applicable to him. You are the definition of Unhinged |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by thumperclone on 08/15/25 at 02:47:31 You are the definition of Unhinged[/quote] you are blinded |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/15/25 at 05:51:31 From the same CEO: The metrics aren't completely calculated by political stance since the onboarding isn't politically defined, we offer services all over the world not just the US. The political climate at this time trends more towards anti-Administration protests, but we also had many on the payroll to help Trump during the election. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by thumperclone on 08/15/25 at 08:42:16 You Label Trump fascist.And the definition is not applicable to him. [/quote] Fascism doctorial leader check centralized autocracy check forcible suppression of opposition check |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/15/25 at 18:05:21 160A170F120710010E0D0C07620 wrote:
Fascism doctorial leader check centralized autocracy check forcible suppression of opposition check [/quote] doctorial Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Encyclopedia. Related to doctorial: Doctoral thesis, Doctoral degree ThesaurusAntonymsRelated WordsSynonymsLegend: Switch to new thesaurus Adj. 1. doctorial - of or relating to a doctor or doctorate; "doctoral dissertation"; "doctorial candidates" doctoral You are a special kind of stupid |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/15/25 at 19:51:09 It's pretty clear to me the typo was for "dictatorial" leader. It is my opinion that it's pretty clear to me the typo was for "dictatorial" leader. Not unlike saying "fascist.And" is not a word. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by WebsterMark on 08/16/25 at 04:06:07 It waters down the horrors of actual fascism when it’s tossed around as a description of Trump. Same when racist and bigot are tossed around strictly based on a different political ideology.As I said before neither Trump nor any previous presidential administration has ever been 1% fascist. If Trump is racist, then so is Biden given his comments and jungles and black students. But the truth is neither one has given repeated evidence they are racist. Remember, the correct definition of racism is passing negative judgment on a person or group of persons based solely on the color of their skin and not on any specific actions. I see nothing that would allow me to label either one. Now I absolutely know people who are racist, without a doubt. You can’t hide that, especially with regards to people in the public eye who regularly speak. Neither Trump or Biden, or any other recent Presidents are racist. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by thumperclone on 08/16/25 at 07:26:24 doctorial Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Encyclopedia. Related to doctorial: Doctoral thesis, Doctoral degree ThesaurusAntonymsRelated WordsSynonymsLegend: Switch to new thesaurus Adj. 1. doctorial - of or relating to a doctor or doctorate; "doctoral dissertation"; "doctorial candidates" doctoral You are a special kind of stupid[/quote] my jog to english translator quit working |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/16/25 at 07:39:01 Mox Nix, you wouldn't understand it anyway |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/16/25 at 08:05:54 It waters down the horrors of actual fascism when it’s tossed around as a description of Trump. Same when racist and bigot are tossed around strictly based on a different political ideology.As I said before neither Trump nor any previous presidential administration has ever been 1% fascist. I agree. Unfortunately it's too easy to just use trigger words instead of intelligence to describe things. Remember, the correct definition of racism is passing negative judgment on a person or group of persons based solely on the color of their skin and not on any specific actions. I would say this is inaccurate. A human can be racist and not base the prejudice on skin color alone. Racism is prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior. I know humans that are racist towards humans of the same skin color for instance. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by MnSpring on 08/16/25 at 08:17:48 18383A322F385D0 wrote:
Wrong. they are two different things. Raciest: Skin Color, Religion, Heritage, Language, country of origin. Prejudice: Someone that want's to: Kill You, Harm you, Lie to you, Cheat Steal from you. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/16/25 at 08:29:23 Wrong. they are two different things. Nice SPIN. Racism is the entire sentence, not just the 3 words you selected. "Racism is prejudice" is not what I said. Oxford dictionary disagrees with your assessment. They are Wrong too then. Racism includes prejudice, it does not exclude it. Racism and prejudice are not mutually exclusive. a person who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized. I prefer Merriam Webster myself: having, reflecting, or fostering the belief that race (see race entry 1 sense 1a) is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race Then there is this from Cambridge: someone who believes that their race makes them better, more intelligent, more moral, etc. than people of other races and who does or says unfair or harmful things as a result. Webstermark claims racism is "solely" due to skin color. This is incorrect, a human can be racist for reasons other than skin color. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by WebsterMark on 08/16/25 at 09:48:06 5070727A6770150 wrote:
OK fine. But for 99% of the conversations where the phrase racism comes into play, it’s skin color. Let’s not get hung up on a technicality and let people off the hook. Constantly calling Trump racist is wrong. If you think it’s right, then you have to call Biden racist also. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by thumperclone on 08/16/25 at 09:52:35 4174677F6463677462060 wrote:
more scheisse from the mouth of babes |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/16/25 at 16:15:28 A decision based on race Is racist. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/16/25 at 20:17:37 A decision based on race Is racist. So decisions based on race in let's say the casting of a human to play Martin Luther King in a movie would be racist? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/16/25 at 21:17:06 crappity smack you not a very nice person |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/16/25 at 21:17:42 Fukkyouassho |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/16/25 at 21:20:01 You know what I meant, dikkhead |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/16/25 at 22:05:23 crappity smack you not a very nice person Fukkyouassho You realize the hypocrisy of those two posts right? You know what I meant, dikkhead It looks like you meant any decision based on race is racist. I do not think this is an accurate assessment. To paraphrase Webstermark's assessment: It waters down the horrors of actual racism when it’s tossed around as a description for anything race related. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/16/25 at 23:05:22 You know exactly what I meant. You twisted it to something else. Fukkyouasshole |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by WebsterMark on 08/17/25 at 04:14:15 4E7B68706B6C687B6D090 wrote:
That’s way out of line Jog, way out. You’ve been doing that a lot lately and you need to cut out. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/17/25 at 05:14:47 You know what he did. Intentionally twisted my words. Tired of it. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Needles on 08/17/25 at 06:04:02 Many of your words come pre-twisted. ;) |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/17/25 at 07:29:33 The most intelligent thing you've said in forever,, and still wrong. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by thumperclone on 08/17/25 at 07:56:02 6550435B4047435046220 wrote:
off your meds again I see |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/17/25 at 10:08:21 You know exactly what I meant. You twisted it to something else. Fukkyouasshole Where was your complaining when I debated Webstermark's racist definition? No crying then. Maybe you need to clarify what you mean. Maybe You could provide an example of the adult discussion you have been asking for for years. If a decision based on race is not racist, then what are you saying? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by MnSpring on 08/17/25 at 10:31:14 6B4B49415C4B2E0 wrote:
This is Opinion !!!!!! A Person selected, with white skin, who is engaged to play a history person that had white skin, denying a black skinned person, is NOT raciest. A Person selecting a person to a job, ONLY on the color of their skin, (ect), NOT on their ability to do that job, IS RACIEST ! |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/17/25 at 10:53:47 This is Opinion !!!!!! A Person selected, with white skin, who is engaged to play a history person that had white skin, denying a black skinned person, is NOT raciest. A Person selecting a person to a job, ONLY on the color of their skin, (ect), NOT on their ability to do that job, IS RACIEST ! Would it also be prejudice? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by MnSpring on 08/17/25 at 11:09:18 08282A223F284D0 wrote:
According to YOUR OPINION ! |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/17/25 at 12:07:59 According to YOUR OPINION ! And empirical evidence. Of course we can choose not to Observe certain definitions. Are you actually saying that racism and prejudice are mutually exclusive? So if something is racist it can not be prejudice because they are "two different things"? A Person selecting a person to a job, ONLY on the color of their skin, (ect), NOT on their ability to do that job, IS RACIEST ! Is it also prejudice? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/18/25 at 22:51:08 If you're Paying people to protest or attend rallies, there's something fundamentally wrong with that |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by WebsterMark on 08/19/25 at 03:51:48 1F2A39213A3D392A3C580 wrote:
I would hope everyone would agree with that. Who wouldn’t? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by thumperclone on 08/19/25 at 04:25:04 675241594245415244200 wrote:
paying people to come to your birthday party?? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Needles on 08/19/25 at 04:58:38 The only ones actually caught paying rally attendees are the MAGATs. Even the coup attempt was paid for... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/18/donald-trump-election-interference-case-new-evidence/75714784007/ https://www.rawstory.com/trump-caught-paying-people-to-attend-nevada-rally/ https://truthout.org/articles/trump-allies-paid-millions-to-jan-6-rally-organizers-since-2020/ ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/19/25 at 05:50:28 If you're Paying people to protest or attend rallies, there's something fundamentally wrong with that I would hope everyone would agree with that. Who wouldn’t? Both Trump and Harris did it. It's just another part of the propaganda that literally every single campaign system uses. I can't think of any campaign that used policy proposals and honesty to win an election. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/19/25 at 05:53:05 The only ones actually caught paying rally attendees are the MAGATs. Even the coup attempt was paid for... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/18/donald-trum... https://www.rawstory.com/trump-caught-paying-people-to-attend-nevada-rally/ https://truthout.org/articles/trump-allies-paid-millions-to-jan-6-rally-organize rs-since-2020/ Einstein would be disappointed at that number of references. Why wasn't one enough? https://suzukisavage.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1754656820/6#6 |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Needles on 08/19/25 at 06:30:11 I don't make the rules. I'm just playing the game. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/20/25 at 00:24:40 Yeah, Trump, paid people.. I'm calling BS. Printed lies are still lies. Russia Russia Russia put out by Trustworthy sources.. Lies |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Needles on 08/20/25 at 05:51:13 Tunnel vision, man! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/20/25 at 08:24:27 Yeah, Trump, paid people.. I'm calling BS. They either paid people or all those people fabricated income paperwork for the IRS. Which is more plausible? Trump affiliated campaign paid them, or that they all are risking jail time by fabricating income paperwork so they can pay taxes on money they never received? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/20/25 at 08:28:36 I'm gonna need more actual information. Who paid taxes? What are you talking about? Where did you get the info? |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/20/25 at 08:40:33 I'm gonna need more actual information. Who paid taxes? Humans paid to attend Trump events. What are you talking about? Where did you get the info? The supporting evidence in Needle's links has plenty of it. (Of course by his own logic if he were right he would have only used one) The Jan 6th investigations showed paid participants, not many, but groups paid through American Made Media Consultants attended Trump events. The Detroit Union event had paid attendees. Multiple were not Union, and weren't even auto workers. They were there for show, and paid. So are these people faking their paychecks, which are on record, in the hopes to make Trump look bad? Or were they paid to attend? To be fair the volume of paid protesters against Trump are much much higher. But I would say no campaign has such high integrity that they woud never pay people to attend an event. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by JOG on 08/20/25 at 08:53:51 I'll reluctantly and painfully accept what you say. And I'm very happy to see you make This point be fair the volume of paid protesters against Trump are much much higher. But I would say no campaign has such high integrity that they woud never pay people to attend an event And I don't agree with ever Paying anyone to protest an opponent or attend my rally. That is all fukktup. Trump IS the best president I've seen. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by Eegore on 08/20/25 at 09:09:53 And I don't agree with ever Paying anyone to protest an opponent or attend my rally. That is all fukktup. Agreed. If it were me I also would not allow attack ads. That's why you or I would never win an election. Another problem is that independent campaigns can do what they want as long as they don't indicate the candidate approves. |
|
Title: Re: Ship them in to the rallies Post by MnSpring on 08/20/25 at 14:34:54 "... Trump IS the best president I've seen. ..." I would put Reagan as the best in the last 65-70 years. Trump 2nd, and JFK 3rd. |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |