|
SuzukiSavage.com
/cgi-bin/YaBB.pl General Category >> Politics, Religion (Tall Table) >> Grijalva /cgi-bin/YaBB.pl?num=1762458074 Message started by Serowbot on 11/06/25 at 11:41:14 |
|
Title: Grijalva Post by Serowbot on 11/06/25 at 11:41:14 She was elected over a month ago but she can't be sworn in until the 2/3 votes are certified but she can't be sworn in until the house is in session but she can't be sworn in until the the shutdown is over She will be the tie breaking vote that gets the Epstein files released It will have to happen eventually Meanwhile, Southern Az has been without representation since March and the party that ran on release of the Epstein files has avoided their release So sad... Trump wanted them released so bad :-? MAGA |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by MnSpring on 11/06/25 at 11:59:39 7365726F77626F74000 wrote:
Did any one else, not have representation for the same time ? |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by thumperclone on 11/06/25 at 12:51:45 the average American has none from the white house |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by zevenenergie on 11/06/25 at 13:03:19 This man heads a political party in the Netherlands. He is an immigrant from Turkey.The party is a branch of the ultranationalist Turkish group "Grey Wolves" http://https://i.imgur.com/fBtdF51.png They have only one goal, though they manage to conceal it well: to activate the Turkish community in the Netherlands to realize the Turkish Agenda for domination of the Netherlands. The ideology behind this is extremely extreme and dictatorial. France and Germany are in the process of banning this organization. They are very well organized and have legally embedded themselves in the Netherlands. About 3% of the population voted for them, and their membership is growing annually. Note that they are all Turkish immigrants. And that's just the visible branch of the gray wolves.Milliyetçi Hareket Partis Bozkurtlar or Ülkü Ocaklar[ch305], Ülkücü Hareket, Are the names of their above-ground organization that serve President Erdogan. Make no mistake. Foreign countries are eager to gain power in wealthy Western countries. By any means necessary. You just elected a new major In the financial capital of your country? Know very well what you are throwing overboard and bringing in to get rid of Trump. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Serowbot on 11/06/25 at 14:41:46 The point is, after running all over it we now know he's all over it He wanted it released, now he wants it buried MAGA |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by WebsterMark on 11/07/25 at 04:13:06 4355425F47525F44300 wrote:
Oh no! Southern Arizona hasn’t had representation in Congress since March! What will they do?! Bodies must be piling up in the streets by now. Fires stretching to the horizon! Calm, sensible people have turn mad, killing strangers, robbing at will, mass anarchy! What will we do?! |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by zevenenergie on 11/07/25 at 04:18:08 7C6A7D60786D607B0F0 wrote:
I understand your point, but it's no reason to be hysterical. Your country is in trouble. Trump is doing well, but he's 79 years old. After 70, things go fast. Around 80, you're elderly, and you see that more and more with Trump. Be real, support your country, and you don't do that by eliminating your president. You create problems that no government can solve in a reasonable timeframe. Meanwhile, America's opponents are growing stronger every day. New York will remain a city of immigrants, a city built by immigrants, powered by immigrants, and, as of tonight, led by an immigrant. That's a pretty extreme shift he's making. Where do Americans figure in this statement, or the American way of life? You complain about ICE, and there are heartbreaking situations, but where were you there when something had to be said about bringing in immigrants to influence the elections? Get my drift? |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/07/25 at 15:17:11 Trump is not the legal President. NOTHING about his second term is legal. >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Eegore on 11/07/25 at 15:31:19 Trump is not the legal President. NOTHING about his second term is legal. Sure wish actual lawyers and the House and the Senate knew what you do. Guess they don't go on social media where the real laws are. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/08/25 at 06:29:07 They know. What kind of idiot would file charges against the criminals when the criminals are running things? Every one of 47's cronies are going to jail. THEY know it. It's YOU that hasn't figured that out. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Eegore on 11/08/25 at 06:44:49 They know. What kind of idiot would file charges against the criminals when the criminals are running things? Every one of 47's cronies are going to jail. THEY know it. It's YOU that hasn't figured that out. This coming from someone that thinks the SCOTUS can change the US Constitution. Just toss down accredited legal arguments, with references, that shows that Trump is illegally in office. Follow your own demands that you have of others. I know he dodged actual criminal charges and got away with crimes. But we can't go making up laws, or saying the laws that we have now "don't apply" because there is "No PRECEDENT". Trump got away with crimes, the US judicial system did not convict him of a specific crime that prohibits a position as POTUS. Our legal system requires conviction for charges to be recognized. No amount of made up social media laws you quote change that. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Serowbot on 11/08/25 at 07:02:47 47584B58535853584F5A54583D0 wrote:
Our pedophile decorator in chief is doing well? :-? :-? :-? |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/08/25 at 08:23:53 4666646C7166030 wrote:
That's what HE and the MAGAT minions are doing! So, you think one side needs to follow the laws while the other side can ignore them? That's an idiot position. War is war. Fight Fire with Fire. >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Eegore on 11/08/25 at 10:30:15 That's what HE and the MAGAT minions are doing! Yeah that's too bad. I'm still not going to use lies to argue my position, I'm certainly not going to complain about other people being wrong while admitting I lie. So, you think one side needs to follow the laws while the other side can ignore them? I never said that. Sides don't matter when reading law, if you could get over this sides thing you might be able to actually follow your own demands of others and utilize resources without bias. I said Trump is getting away with crimes, because our legal system does not imprison US citizens on charges alone for the crimes he committed, it requires conviction. That's an idiot position. War is war. Fight Fire with Fire. The idiot position is demanding truth and references from others, then admitting you are duplicitous on purpose, refuse to provide references, then blame it on someone else. Nobody is fooled by the - I lie because they lie more - excuse. Your lying is not strategic, it's just how you do things. Fire with fire would eliminate US judicial system functions. If we resort to using social media posts as law, then there is no law. Just toss down accredited legal arguments, with references, that shows that Trump is illegally in office. Follow your own demands that you have of others. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by WebsterMark on 11/09/25 at 03:38:33 I don’t read all these back and forth responses between these two but it’s like what I imagine it would watching a teacher explaining algebra to Forrest Gump. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Eegore on 11/09/25 at 06:43:25 I don’t read all these back and forth responses between these two but it’s like what I imagine it would watching a teacher explaining algebra to Forrest Gump. Gump didn't know any better. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/09/25 at 07:45:24 Duplicitous on purpose would be Trump and his minions. JD even SAID he'd make things up just to get his "message" (Propaganda) across. In true MAGAT fashion, you jump in my sh*t for being honest, advance misrepresentations yourself, and ignore the people YOU voted for, people whose words DO matter. Classic MAGAT false equivalency and hypocrisy. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Eegore on 11/09/25 at 08:21:32 Duplicitous on purpose would be Trump and his minions. Agreed. You do it to, and think blaming Trump for your actions makes sense. JD even SAID he'd make things up just to get his "message" (Propaganda) across. As did you, you SAID you would lie on purpose. Then you blame Trump/supporters for your actions. In true MAGAT fashion, you jump in my sh*t for being honest, advance misrepresentations yourself, and ignore the people YOU voted for, people whose words DO matter. Classic MAGAT false equivalency and hypocrisy. You aren't being honest. You said you would lie, you were caught obviously lying, then you (poorly) defended your lying by saying it's other people's fault that you lie. Then you are going to sit here and say you are being honest? Then you lie again and say I voted for Trump. But lets chalk that up to simple ignorance, and childish blame-game reactions because you are incapable of articulating an adult response to a normal conversation. I say the same applies to your claim that the SCOTUS can change the US Constitution. You just made that up, which may not be intentionally duplicitous as you might think that nonsense is true. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by WebsterMark on 11/09/25 at 08:24:23 7B5B59514C5B3E0 wrote:
Like I said before, you voluntarily took on this cross to bear, I occasionally ease the burden for a moment or two but kudos to you for sticking with it. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/09/25 at 13:31:02 Fukov. Both you MAGAT twits ignore MAGAT illegalities and try to make me follow the rules. I'm no Democrat, you morons. I won't follow the rules and play the game while you idiots cheat. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Eegore on 11/09/25 at 13:45:51 Fukov. Both you MAGAT twits ignore MAGAT illegalities and try to make me follow the rules. I never said you need to follow anything. I'm no Democrat, you morons. I never said you were. Unlike you, I don't repeatedly make false claims about other members lives. You don't have to be a Republican or a Democrat to state the nonsense that you do. I won't follow the rules and play the game while you idiots cheat. There is no cheating, this is a simple discussion forum. You make sh!t up and this is the only defense you have. I get it, you probably aren't used to people taking your written statements and proving they are categorically false so insults and whining about how unfair things are is the obvious choice. You have proven you aren't willing to follow the standards you demand of others, and the simplest way to avoid admitting that is to blame your behavior on other people. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Eegore on 11/09/25 at 13:57:02 Like I said before, you voluntarily took on this cross to bear, I occasionally ease the burden for a moment or two but kudos to you for sticking with it. The immaturity doesn't bother me, I still can move the decent points to adult areas and have actual conversations. Needles brings up some decent points, but is incapable of having an adult conversation about them. For instance I've been having decent traction in regards to why the US Constitution seems harder to amend now than it was historically. If Needles could have that discussion without insisting his false statements are 1:Not his fault. or 2: Actually true, then he could possibly contribute. Another example is income disparity. There are great conversations and ideas on how to address this in business and law, but Needles can't have that conversation without insulting people. So while it would be nice to know the details behind his idea here, not one person looked over his posts here and considered him to be interested or capable of actual conversation on this issue. This is really no different than JoG insisting his sources citing millions of kids died from vaccines are valid, when he could have been contributing to conversations about vaccine risks in children. Instead of looking at his data, he just said "fukkoff". Not unlike Needles here saying "Fukov". These guys don't want discussion, they want people to agree with them. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Serowbot on 11/09/25 at 13:57:07 It is a desperate effort to say the least When Grijjalva is eventually seated the vote will happen and the Epstein files will be released This is what the Right has been crying for Maybe they're hoping to delay long enough that some other Democrat will die and they can stall even longer? ...but what if it's a Republican? I didn't even care until Trump started to care so much Curiouser and curiouser Down the rabbit hole we go MAGA |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Eegore on 11/09/25 at 13:58:51 I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of those files were never archived. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by WebsterMark on 11/09/25 at 17:16:57 4B5D4A574F5A574C380 wrote:
1) What are you gonna do if there’s nothing there? 2’ How many times have you said “we got Trump!” ? 50? |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/10/25 at 06:10:46 1. If there was nothing there, they would've already been released. 2. Trump HAS been caught breaking the law, involved in corruption, and abusing his 'power'. You MAGAT a$$holes keep letting him go--- enough times that the Dems are waiting until the whole regime is ousted before proceeding with legal reparations. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by MnSpring on 11/10/25 at 06:46:10 2D0606070F0610630 wrote:
What party is a, " Full Bowen Socialist " |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/10/25 at 06:51:25 " If Needles could have that discussion without insisting his false statements are 1:Not his fault. or 2: Actually true, then he could possibly contribute. " Liar. What "false" statements? I speak the truth, from the information available. I've never said anything I've posted was "not my fault", so YOU'RE lying. "Actually true"? I've posted that 47 et al ignore laws. I've also posted that they ignore the US Constitution. YOU, OTOH, keep trying to refer to the laws and the Constitution as if they are still valid arguments. That's also lying by misdirection. And, YES, with NO LAWS, some of my own suggestions DO violate what used to be the law. You keep expecting ME to follow the rules, when MAGATs do not. YOU are one of the slimy "conservatives" that think they can control the wild a$$ you've released to destroy the country. NOTHING MAGATs stand for is even vaguely American in values, morals, or understanding. YES, I'm pissed off, and YES, sometimes I'm illogical, because, like many, once I'm pissed off, I'm not logical or calm, I'm just pissed off. JOG is an obvious MAGAT, like so many here. YOU think are one of the ones pulling strings on the puppet government. YOU simply don't understand that the strings you're pulling are not attached to anything. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Serowbot on 11/10/25 at 07:12:39 I can't remember the circumstance, but I have actually seen at least two of the photos with Trump and topless very young girls It was several years ago Maybe before his first election I'm surprised more people haven't seen them because I have no special access |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by MnSpring on 11/10/25 at 07:33:20 6A7C6B766E7B766D190 wrote:
WOW, Can you say, Photoshop, or today, AI ????????? Even Snopes, an ULTRA LIBERAL, DFI, FDS, WOKE, site says, FALSE |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/10/25 at 08:53:11 Snopes is a center right site. It was bought out by a billionaire MAGAT, so it can no longer be trusted.. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by MnSpring on 11/10/25 at 09:37:11 5C7777767E7761120 wrote:
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL "... It was bought out by a billionaire MAGAT, so it can no longer be trusted ..." And your PROOF of that, IS ???????????? (Specifically, that the new owners are, "BILLIONAIRES", And their political beliefs. Not just their party registration) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Eegore on 11/10/25 at 14:51:01 Liar. What "false" statements? I speak the truth, from the information available. I answered this the last two times you asked, I even categorized our specific conversations. You keep ignoring it. Senate is a Grand Jury and impeachment requires a Federal Court. LEO requires a "WARRANT" to wear a mask. SCOTUS can change the US Constitution. EPA definitions for wetlands. SCOTUS definitions in law can only apply to "THAT CASE" All things you just made up. If it was "information available" you definitely do not come close to using the same standards you demand of others and provide references for these comments, instead you do a poor job of justifying your double standard by calling people names. I've never said anything I've posted was "not my fault", so YOU'RE lying. I never said you did. The words: Not my fault were not in quotations or in my standard method of using italics for direct quoting. It is my assessment that you use multiple means of conveying your lies are because other people lie more. Not your fault, you lie because Trump lies more. I've posted that 47 et al ignore laws. I've also posted that they ignore the US Constitution. YOU, OTOH, keep trying to refer to the laws and the Constitution as if they are still valid arguments. That's also lying by misdirection. Incorrect. Quoting the US Constitution is not lying by misdirection, just because the Trump administration is in violation of it. Using the US Constitution to quote the US Constitution is completely valid. Do you realize how ridiculous you sound? I don't make up laws or legal process out of thin air, your attempt to make it sound like I am lying through "misdirection" by literally quoting law, or the US Constitution is weak. And, YES, with NO LAWS, some of my own suggestions DO violate what used to be the law. You keep expecting ME to follow the rules, when MAGATs do not. I never said that I expect you to follow any rules, you made that up. I said my arguments use actual US law and multiple times you have used arguments from social media, or made up ones from your own head. The SCOTUS can change the definition of treason? YOU are one of the slimy "conservatives" that think they can control the wild a$$ you've released to destroy the country. NOTHING MAGATs stand for is even vaguely American in values, morals, or understanding. YOU keep insisting I voted for Trump. Name calling doesn't make your made up bullsh!t valid, screaming MAGAT!! validates nothing about what you say. I quote the US Constitution, you say it's fake/not valid now because Trump violated it. Nice deflection, but the bottom line is you simply make sh!t up and don't want to acknowledge that. People would have a lot more respect for you if you would just say something like -Oh I didn't know there was no Federal Court to impeach, instead of this name calling, claiming the US Constitution is fake/isn't valid, I lie because Trump lies more nonsense. I'm not making that up, multiple people have said this. YES, I'm pissed off, and YES, sometimes I'm illogical, because, like many, once I'm pissed off, I'm not logical or calm, I'm just pissed off. And also duplicitous. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by WebsterMark on 11/11/25 at 04:02:43 2C3A2D30283D302B5F0 wrote:
Given Joe Biden‘s well-known habit of paying particularly close attention to young girls, you clearly establish the president that the president is free to do whatever he wants in those circumstances. In other words, you have no standing. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/11/25 at 13:50:45 Rumor has it they are waiting for an "emergency" election in Tennessee, to balance the Grijalva vote. The Moron MAGATs think they have a chance, after losing EVERY race. The joke's on them. That seat is for the Nashville Metro--- a blur hold-out area in the red(a$$ed) state. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Serowbot on 11/11/25 at 14:26:44 526067767160774864776E050 wrote:
Biden lost an infant daughter in a car accident His tendency toward little girls hair might just be related and does not seem sexual at all Handjobs and blowjobs and peeping at topless underage girls is a different category Get real Web I mean really Do not dare equate The comparison is disgusting |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by WebsterMark on 11/11/25 at 15:23:11 3422352830252833470 wrote:
Biden lost an infant daughter in a car accident His tendency toward little girls hair might just be related and does not seem sexual at all Handjobs and blowjobs and peeping at topless underage girls is a different category Get real Web I mean really Do not dare equate The comparison is disgusting [/quote] Bless your heart…. |
|
Title: Re: Grijalva Post by Needles on 11/12/25 at 05:26:38 Whatever you imagine about Biden, he never tried to destroy the US. That is MAGA's GOAL. >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( |
|
SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |