Savage_Rob wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:10:I've kinda wondered about that anyway. It seems like the pod has a lot less surface area than the drop-in K&N I have now. The only caveat there is the bottleneck at the snorkel under the seat. That's really my primary restriction now and the shortened K&N pod may still be more than that _ I don't know.
Geez this is gonna take a minute.....this discussion is all about surface area, and I'm pretty certain that my pod filter has more than a stock filter.
First, let me insert this link for my K&N filter. This gives all the relative dimensions, too.
RC-1250It states that my pod filter has a top diameter of 2", a base diameter of 3.5" and a length of 4"....
I think that it might be time for a little math, but unfortunately, I'm a little rusty. It involves some area calculations, and I can't remember exactly how to figure the surface area of a cone....a little research would help, but I'm also a little lazy....
Anyway, if someone has the time, could they take their old stock filter and roll it into a tube and tell us the diameter of that tube?
Or simply multiply the length and width and give us the surface area of the filter element alone (don't count the edges)?
I'm betting that the K&N pod has more surface area than a flat stock filter....