911radioman wrote on 12/31/69 at 16:00:02:Here's my thing that I can tell so far with what I've done...
It appears the bottom has dropped out of my fuel mileage. Granted, I expected a little drop due to increasing fuel flow, but my last tank checked out at 41 mpg.
I'm not heavy handed when I ride, and keep a pretty even throttle hand when out on the highway. Now, as I said before, the plug when I pulled it the other day seemed a bit sooty -- no wet fouling, just a dry sort of soot. Tells me it is rich -- correct?
By what I read, the K&N by increasing air flow should serve to lean that back out, right?
If I don't see any leveling out of the mileage, I'm considering backing up one size on the main jet to say, a 150, possibly.
Right now, I'm having a difficult time seeing where everybody is making these mods and still averaging around 50 mpg when mine has tanked. Kinda aggravating, since the tank on this bike is milk jug sized anyhow...
I'm just trying to pinpoint any area where I may be off a bit, or may need to do additional to level this thing out. Performance of the bike is great powerwise. But I'm not impressed at all with what it has done to my fuel economy.
For optimum performance/mpg I would suggest one or the other. The faster air and fuel get through the engine the more power you're creating, you're just not pushing enough air into the engine for the amount of fuel you're putting in. the choice is yours, but keep in mind more air is going to mean more power, with less filtration. That would be my choice, new K&N rather than screwing with the jets anymore. This should also help with fuel economy since the fuel should burn more thoroughly, thereby creating more power/less waste.
But I'm talking tech, I haven't done these mods myself (garage is too cold right now, but they're coming real soon)