Jerry Eichenberger
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

2006 S40. OEM windshield, saddle bags, Sportster
Posts: 2919
Columbus, Ohio
Gender:
|
I'll try to respond to several posts.
First, as for flying, the limit is .04%, AND at least 8 hours since the last drink. Reasonable - landing a jet in the rain at night has almost no relationship to going 45 mph down a country road in broad daylight.
I know nothing about the limit for truckers.
But the big one is that those who cause accidents, who go up a freeway the wrong way, the chronic "drunk drivers" are just that - DRUNK. Meaning that they are typically near .20% or higher. These folks should be dealt with severely.
My issue is that .08% isn't drunk - yes, it may be a little impaired compared to nothing at all. But we allow one eyed people to drive, we allow paraplegics to drive in cars equipped with all hand controls, and an ever increasing problem - the truly elderly who can barely walk 10 yards or whose cognitive functions have severely declined all still drive. None of these folks is unimpaired; in fact, they are quite impaired compared with a normal, healthy person who has had no alcohol.
So, we don't have a zero tolerance policy, nor should we. I simply advocate returning the legal limit to around .15%, where is was for decades until MADD became so powerful. .15% is drunk.
But the business person, the guy or gal who just got off his/her shift at work, and all of the rest of us who stop on the way home for a couple of drinks should be left alone. .08% is not drunk, nor any more impaired than all of the other impaired drivers who legally drive everyday, and who cause accidents too.
As for zero tolerance, sorry - I'm not a tea totaler. But if you are, please don't drive when you have a common head cold and may feel a little groggy from your doze of Nyquil the night before - you're worse off than the guy who is at .08%.
|