Jerry Eichenberger
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

2006 S40. OEM windshield, saddle bags, Sportster
Posts: 2919
Columbus, Ohio
Gender:
|
WM -
Living in Ohio, I've followed this insanity since it began.
There has always been a dream to connect Cincinnati, Columbus, and Cleveland. Before the interstate highway system, we had old U.S. Rt. 3, called the "3 C Highway" that ran that route.
Now, Interstate Rt. 71 does the same, and therein lies the root of the reason that the train is such a silly idea.
I live in Columbus, almost 1/2 way between Cincinnati and Cleveland. From here, it's about 115 miles southwest to Cinci, and about 125 miles northeast to Cleveland.
I can drive from my office in suburban Columbus to downtown Cinci in about 2 hours, and to downtown Cleveland in 2.5 hours. Rt. 71 is in good repair, and traffic flows smoothly along it, except for those few days in the depth of winter when the northern 1/3 of Ohio is battered by snowfall, since that part of our state lies within the region known as the Lake Erie snowbelt.
To make either trip by train would take longer. I would have to drive to a train station, obviously arriving there at least 1/2 hour before departure time to park the car, get my ticket, clear some level of security, and board the train. Then, the train, at 68 mph, would go exactly as fast as I drive on Rt. 71. When arriving at some station at the destination, I would then have to get off of the train, get in a cab line with all of the other passengers, and get a cab to wherever I would go in the downtown.
But if my final destination isn't downtown, but in some outlying area of either city, then the whole trip becomes absolute nonsense if by train.
These distances are just too short to make public rail transportation reasonable.
Even those who need to go from Cinci to Cleveland, or the reverse, can drive the trip in just a little over 4 hours. Again, that's far less time then if they go by this proposed train.
Now, a train would make sense from Columbus to Chicago, New York, St. Louis, etc. - trips of 300 miles or more. But train travel is nonsense for a 125 mile trip when that same route is served by a very good Interstate highway.
Everyone forgets that train stations are like airports - never your final destination - you have to spend time somehow getting from the station to and from where you're actually going in the destination area.
In Europe, things are much different - gasoline is so much more expensive that travel by private car isn't nearly as cheap as it is here. Old European cities are more densely populated and the cities don't sprawl as much as ours do, hence, getting from your home or office to the train station isn't as big a hassle as it is here. Sure, Paris and London are huge and spread out, but the more common, smaller cities are much more dense.
|