& Now, you owe the man an apology.

Disagree, but that was a personal low blow.. I trust you found my apology to you the other day? I meant it. I Do not agree with you. I hope one day ( I know, you feel the same way, AND we each are completely convinced we are correct) youll see enough of what Ive said come true that youre forced to rethink your position. Well,, Think your position is more correct, because I dont bvelieve youve thot your way into the position you so desperately hold on to. I believe you were a kid in school & had a good heart & wanted good things for everyone & believed that right legislation could deliver it.. Sadly, it cant. If it could, if it were mathematically possible, Id agree with you, but, it simply will not work, so, I cant stand with you in your ideas about How we need to get where we need to be. My opinion of what life is & what it can be differ from yours. YOu believe suffering & poverty can be solved by taxing & spreading the wealth, but after years of it, its no better.,. hell,, its worse, so, step back, study RON Paul,, not Rand, hes kinda goofy,, read the Lew Rockwell site, check out Mises.
&, theres a book by Keynes you otta try to read. If you can make 4 chapters & not real;ize the impossibility of it, youre hopelessly lost. Your logic has failed you.

I never doubt for a minute JOG that our core values are very similar, it's (as you said) that we agree to disagree on how America can achieve it's original objectives via government. That is how Abraham Lincoln so eloquently put it:

"That this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth."

WebsterMark wrote on 10/30/12 at 19:58:33:



No no you're a super wealthy CEO, stop acting like you cant afford your heavy drinking ...
If somehow you cant ... still no, tough love is all you get.

Cool.
Srinath.