Jerry Eichenberger
Serious Thumper
   
Offline

2006 S40. OEM windshield, saddle bags, Sportster
Posts: 2919
Columbus, Ohio
Gender:
|
A couple of things:
First, I get sick and tired of hearing how the taxpayers paid to bail out banks during the recession. Those were loans, not gifts. They have been repaid, and in some instances, such as when the Treasury took shares of companies in addition to making the loans, the gov't has gotten a huge profit. Nothing wrong with that, let's just not twist the facts.
Next, what is "rich"? To a poor Mexican peon or slum dweller in Rio, $5,000 per year is beyond his wildest imagination.
For Americans, what is rich? Income test or asset test?
Yes, those very few who are at the top of the Fortune 100 list, measured by assets held, probably inherited their wealth, such as the Walton hiers, and the like.
But if your definition of rich gets down to those whose wealth is measured, say, at around $50 Million or less, most of them earned it themselves in the first generation.
A big problem is on the horizon again, at that's the effect on farmers of increasing land values. Forget real estate taxes, I mean inheritance taxes. If the fiscal cliff isn't resolved, the amount of an estate that isn't taxed is only $1 Million, and all over $1 Million is taxed at 55%. The exemption is currently $5 Million.
With land values in Iowa farm country hitting $14,000 per acre in some autumn land sales, $1 Million is 71.4 acres of land. A farmer can't even earn a mediocre living on a farm that small. So, asset tests of wealth are stupid and horribly unfair.
|