That Rf-id trigger lock itself has been rejected by the NRA. We can make it into a bracelet, you wear it when you want to use the gun, however what happens if you lose it etc etc.
Fingerprint tagging is far more idiot proof, its a extension of the rf-id technology. However, it first needs to be open to being adopted. Right there it fails. The gun nuts want a gun that will be fire-able under any circumstances wihtout restriction. That's what happens when nutcase son decides to kill momma and take the guns or grandma killing ex felon decides to kill his sister and set his house ablaze and kill firefighters.

Sorry freedom is not to arrive to help to put out a fire, and get shot when you try.
Cool.
Srinath.

The fact about the swiss you mis represented was that gun ownership is 100% ... its near 100% among people who have served. Since 100 women served and all men do, I'd say its close to 50% + 1000 ... duh ...

You're done with the pig wrestling ... cos you have points full of holes ?

Wife/child - get their own rf-tag cloned with yours ? unless you want to get another gun ?

Dirty hands - finger prints still are there aren't they ? Anyway that tech has to be made to work when you hands are covered in dough. Its still in the future, rf-id tag is present ... and been rejected by NRA.

Sorry man, NRA looks like it seeks to arm criminals, jus tso you would buy more guns for "self defence" ... easy cause, when they have armed the criminals too.

Cool.
Srinath.

NRA supports gun control. They supported the 68 gun control act. Ive seen an interview where one of their board members said "No one needs more than a single shot". Controlled opposition, understand it.
Gun Owners of America,, theres your group to support.

Just watched the Mythbusters chop down trees with a 30 cal. 3000 round pm Gatling gun on you tube. Would that qualify??

If I can't drop the target with one shot, I don't take the shot. Regardless of how many rounds are available.

I know wild boar is a delicacy in Europe, but here they are a dammed nuisance. Even the buzzards won't eat them. Many state game departments have issued eradication orders on them. One or two marksmen with 30 round magazines makes a whole lot more sense than sending in a couple hundred weekend wannabe types who tend to do more damage to themselves (high alcohol consumption) than they do the pig population. So few people around here still hunt that I'm allowed 3 doe, per day, from early September to January 6th. And right now we're in a 30 geese per day season.

30 round AR/SK/AK or belt fed shotgun, to me, is just another harvest tool.

In addition to what Lancer said, which was 100% correct, IF you believe gun control laws work, go look at crime stats where gun control laws are enacted. Then, go look at crime stats where gun control Used to be & look at what happened when restrictions were removed. Its been demonstrated that gun control laws Do Not work AND,, its the Right, its the Duty & Obligation for Citizens to understand the nature of those who seek the power of office. With few exceptions, Ron Paul, most notably, seek power of the position. Cynthia McKinney is another who I think very highly of.
I REmember when car jacking was all good fun for the car jackers. I remember when La. changed their law. They decided there had been enough good people dragged out of their car, beaten, stabbed or shot, maybe tangled in the seat belt & dragged to death & they decided to "Allow" the People to arm themselves. After only a few thugs lay kicking,screaming, bleeding & Dying in the streets, the car jacking game was over.
Self defense is NORMAL behavior. If you are against guns, dont have one. If youre ever the victim, Im SURE youll tell anyone other than a cop who would use a gun to save your hide to put it away, that you hate guns unless a cop or a military man has it.
Think, try to lay aside what youve been taught by society. TRy to consider how you would see things if not for all the anti-gun rhetoric youve had crammed into your ears. Dont just be a parrot, THINK, sit quietly & Think for yourself. Ask yourself WHY you feel the way you do. Ask yourself if its a Normal way to feel. Is it Natural?( how many even know the difference?) Is it Natural to Want the criminals to have the upper hand? Is it Natural to willingly be unable to defend ones self & ones family? Why is it superior to want to be so easily made a victim? Why is it inferior to NOT want to be unable to protect ones self, family & property from street thugs &  tyrants?


Ohh, isnt there a law that says No GUns in or near a school?

How is that one working out?

Why do you gun-nuts...oh sorry, gun-aficionados keep repeating the same old NRA talking points over and over and over??? Yeah, we heard it the first time. Give it a rest. Oh and your misinterpretation (on purpose) of the 2nd amendment is getting old too. You always seem to leave out the "well regulated militia" part, you know, the National Guard, Air Force Reserve etc.

Number one, here is the amendment from archives.com:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Number two are the commas. Punctuation is foreign to many people today. Remove the commas and the meaning changes. As it stands, I have every right to any weapon I choose.

Number 3 the national guard or the reserves are not a state entity, they are federal. However any homegrown militia in every state has been called unconstitutional.

Number 4 regulated is not regulated by the federal government. I don't have a first edition, but according to my 2nd edition Webster's dictionary it means organized. Not state organized. Not federal organized. Just organized. I could be the organizer of the Benic Militia and be the only member. It still follows the letter of the law.

Number 5 it does not say that the people can only have a black powder pistol or rifle. It does not exclude a cannon. It just allows for whatever is available. The constitution is not a living document. There is no reading between the lines. It says what it means and means what it says. Get over it. I have the right to any weapon I deem necessary.

Number 6 the militia at that time was anyone old enough to hold a gun. That doesn't change with time. You may redefine the word but that doesn't change the law.

I urge anyone who would like to understand our founding documents better to get a dictionary from the time period. You would be surprised how many words had their definitions altered over the years.