Donate!
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register :: View Members
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
No one ever implied confiscation. I'm just crazy. (Read 184 times)
WD
Serious Thumper
2005 No Login
*****
Offline

Professional
"scooter
trash".

Posts: 5207
Rosemark TN
Gender: male
Re: No one ever implied confiscation. I'm just cra
Reply #30 - 04/12/13 at 19:13:45
 
The US is just the destination for the hispanic poor.

Really? Then why is the Pacific Northwest full of Slavs, Semites, black Africans, East Indians, Chinese, Vietnamese, Koreans...? Most of whom have been given a small business or tractor trailer by the government, with no expectation of or mandate for repayment. I worked with several Somali truck drivers, who refused to do any mandated maintenance on their rigs because "when it breaks the government will just give me another one".

Stores were routinely taken from American born owners in the late 1980s and handed over to "gooks", now they are losing the stores in favor of Sikhs, Arabs and Africans. None of whom follow food safety mandates, age restrictions on purchases, banned merchandise restrictions, etc.

We're seeing the same here in west TN as I experienced out west. My favorite local market went from local born and raised ownership, stocking products tailored to the local area, to being Lebanese run. High school kids are routinely in there buying beer and cigarettes...
Back to top
 
 

On 2 wheels since 7/87

Black and Chrome 2003 1950s style custom
  IP Logged
srinath
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 5349

Re: No one ever implied confiscation. I'm just cra
Reply #31 - 04/12/13 at 19:35:20
 
WD - I lived in the NW and am injun. I got nothing, not even a used motorcycle from the govt.

So what govt is handing over what vehicle to which somali ?
The rest of the BS - I have tried to call ICE or other crap on Illegals and criminals to have nothing happen. Month after month, year after year ... we dont have too much law enforcement ... we have none, or far too little law enforcement. Of course that's no indication of the employment in law enforcement, its just the enforcement of law enforcement that is missing.

In 2016 I am voting for any one who picks Joe Arpaio as VP or writing in Joe Arpaio if he's not on the ticket. However I should say, Obama has deported more in the first 2 years than Bush did in 8.

Cool.
Srinath.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
WD
Serious Thumper
2005 No Login
*****
Offline

Professional
"scooter
trash".

Posts: 5207
Rosemark TN
Gender: male
Re: No one ever implied confiscation. I'm just cra
Reply #32 - 04/12/13 at 19:56:05
 
Any immigrant who wanted to work the Seattle/Tacoma container business was given a truck by the US gov't. Small Business Administration "loan" that was not expected to be paid back.

1/07-1/11 is when I worked the container ship piers, railyards and secure Customs warehouses.

Those drivers were also GIVEN secure facility access cards and haz-mat endorsements.

My t.w.i.c. card (secure facilities access pass) cost around $75, out of my pocket. Haz-mat fingerprinting was $81, the test was $25 and the endorsement (good for 2 years at a time) was even more on top of that.

On a container run that I pulled down $100 gross income, they'd happily underbid the run at $10-20 profit.
Back to top
 
 

On 2 wheels since 7/87

Black and Chrome 2003 1950s style custom
  IP Logged
Paraquat
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

SuzukiSavage.com
Rocks!

Posts: 2206

Re: No one ever implied confiscation. I'm just cra
Reply #33 - 04/13/13 at 05:34:23
 
srinath wrote on 04/12/13 at 18:03:57:
Paraquat wrote on 04/12/13 at 06:09:01:
Just throwing this out there:
Connecticut adopted the 1994 Federal assault weapons ban into state law.
The rifle that was sold and used in this/these crime/crimes was, therefore, not an "assault rifle" as it was purchased after 1994.


--Steve


Yes garbage rules elicit garbage reactions. Nothing needs to be banned, its a constitutional violation. We just charge everyone $100 per bullet. If used justifiably, you get the bullets back.

Cool.
Srinath.


It's not a garbage reaction. If it's not an "assault weapon" why do they keep calling it an "assault weapon"? They are doing it to create a bias and it's obviously working.


--Steve
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
srinath
Serious Thumper
*****
Offline

I love YaBB 1G -
SP1!

Posts: 5349

Re: No one ever implied confiscation. I'm just cra
Reply #34 - 04/13/13 at 20:24:33
 
Paraquat wrote on 04/13/13 at 05:34:23:
It's not a garbage reaction. If it's not an "assault weapon" why do they keep calling it an "assault weapon"? They are doing it to create a bias and it's obviously working.


--Steve


What is working ? there are still shootings - OK the librull naming of the gun and taking it away is working ? I guess that is a valid point.

WD wrote:
Any immigrant who wanted to work the Seattle/Tacoma container business was given a truck by the US gov't. Small Business Administration "loan" that was not expected to be paid back.

What kind of immigrant - I know of several compadres who actually owned trucks and made canada/LA type runs including several who pulled for walmart. Injun, Fijian etc etc ... you're missing some detail here. They weren't handing out trucks to immigrants, my friend owned a mid 80's truck he bought in the mid 90's with a million and 1/2 miles for what I thought was a stupid $$$ something like 7-8g. He said it was low.

Cool.
Srinath.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print


« Home

 
« Home
SuzukiSavage.com
05/14/25 at 08:47:03



General CategoryPolitics, Religion (Tall Table) › No one ever implied confiscation. I'm just crazy.


SuzukiSavage.com » Powered by YaBB 2.2!
YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved.