srinath wrote on 04/23/13 at 15:18:21:Webster - you are reading my whole post backwards ...
This is the right way - the way I intended it.
Bomb people have bombs as their primary. For them guns are secondary.
You give them a gun, they say OK, I'll still make my bomb.
You dont give them a gun ... they say - OK I'll still make my bomb.
The point I am making is: They are not bombing people because guns are not available. They are making bombs in spite of guns being available. So the question of ... "If we do gun control they will make bombs" does not arise. They make bombs no matter what.
Cool.
Srinath.
The things that are Nothing more than opinion that you so strongly believe in that you argue them as fact are just amazing to me.
YOU believe this,, YOU,, & based in what science? Show me the study that was done to make such a determination. Now, I know not everything requires a study in order to have a clue, but to press this idea as "Just an obvious fact" when its just NOT,,
& before you guys hang these young men up & paint them Guilty, remember the Olympic bomber? Remember the guy who supposedly sent the anthrax? Hatfill? Just because someone has been "proven" guilty in the press doesnt mean they are. Im expecting pictures & video evidence to raise some very serious questions, IOW, Im not at all convinced these guys did it,,
Why such short memories?
Remember the Arrest?
The news was out, there had been an arrest, gonna have a news conference At the Courthouse ( You know, where the jail is, where arrested people are held),, then, someone posted some pictures that the FBI said "Dont look at those pictures, theyre misleading",, " Suddenly,,
What? Ohhh, Uhh, NO,, we actually Havent made an arrest,, coff, coff,,
Then, they blocked access to the Courthouse, a van rolls in, then rolls out,, Who did they haul out?
Most likely some redneck moron with about a 75 IQ & no friends or family who would miss him,,
Be thankful they didnt get to hang it on some bumpkin,,