Quote:


This is a lie, a flat out, bald faced lie. Please explain why crime is soo much higher anywhere in England than the worst place in America? And a real explanation, please, not just made up apples to oranges comparisons.

Quote:


You aren't very good at math so you might want to back off these equations. But here you seem to state the obvious while hurting your position and strengthening all of ours. It is very bad for just the bad guys to have guns and is equally as good for the rest of us to be armed. You probably weren't aware you helped us out so I'm just letting you know.

Quote:


You misuse it as an absolute while evidence shows many crimes prevented with guns. Sorry, your example has been shot down a while ago and is just not true.

Quote:


Now that this idea has been demolished with logic and reason you are doubling down because you are incapable of admitting learning from your mistakes. Where is the comparison you promised? Please compare to a $100 tax on being Mormon or $100 tax to join the American Motorcyclist Association. How about a $100 to have a trial by jury or a $100 tax on search warrants servead against you? Feel free to pick any of the Ammendments so as to compare apples to apples.

Quote:


Really? So, my alledged ability to mimic the sounds of farm animals (or is it a wild pig) is all the proof you need to show that your unconstitutional $100 tax per bullet idea is sound. When you called the government about your idea did you mention the flouride in the water and violent ground acquisition games such as football is in fact a crypto-fascist metaphor for nuclear war?

Quote:


Nice dodge and deflection. Yes, the newspaper is relevant because it does no good for a reported to write a story and then be prevented from distributing it. Silly man!!

Quote:


This whole paragraph is just plain wrong but equally laughable.  

Quote:


I didn't think you could be any funnier then the paragraph before but you have proven me wrong (first time for everything) and soo soon too. Thank you, I really had a good laugh  

Quote:


Are you referring to the voices in your head because day-to-day you don't seem all that different. I can tell you part of the problem is you seem to come up with solutions without ever understanding the problem. The $100 per bullet tax is a perfect example.

Another problem is you admit to a lot of different people over the past 6 months have tried to educate you and help you understand but you have refused them all. Your refusal to listen, think, discuss, open your mind, use logic, use reason and ask questions rather than just state a bunch of nonsense and then defend said nonsense to the end.


Quote:


The last thing you need to do is venture into another topic which you have no understanding of and end up having to defend more illogical arguments.

Retread wrote on 04/19/13 at 08:58:43:


No American friends...10 years is a long time to not make any ties.

We are not a society that likes wars.I was a kid in the forties,Almost all of the movies were cowboy movies,Cowboys shooting at each other,but it never made anyone want to shoot someone.The wars we have started were to profit the rich.There isn't a country in the world thats wants wars.All countries want to be treated fair.

OK so now we know these 2 boston bombers also had guns.

So the whole theory of "If we restrict guns people will kill with knives, baseball bats, pressure cookers or pink thongs (man saw one guy who was killed with a pink thong, like he was strangled and it took like 36 minutes ... and you could not tell where the pink thong ended and his fat ass began ... scary) ...

OK what is the theory suggested by this data ?

I'll tell you mine.

Fundamentally the bomber wants to walk away and potentially live a long life planting more bombs. Our social media saturation has got him in under a week now ... but he hoped to do this many more times. we can hand out guns to these guys, they will only use it to shoot a cop when he's cornered. You can also restrict guns from these guys and they'd go ... OK we make bomb, gun we dont need.

The shooter wants to cause mayhem and die on the scene. Keep guns from this guy and he'd strangle people with pink thongs and then strangle himself when cornered.

Of course the true career criminal wants to just have a gun for protection and for show, and wants to make away with whatever he is after. Keep guns from this group, and they will find em ... or use knives in some situations.

There is a fundamental difference between these 3 groups.

Stopping team #2 is easy - gun control, bullet control etc. #1 dont care, #3 will get em anyway.

Cool.
Srinath.

Retread wrote on 04/19/13 at 14:14:09:


I think he meant historically. We now have war on everything ... even good causes - poverty, hunger and homelessness.

Cool.
Srinath.

I think this covers it,

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Theodore Roosevelt 1907.

The bastards killing this country speak English.