srinath wrote on 07/01/13 at 12:07:10:


Huh, an article from the 24th which is before the IG's response letter to the same congressman. What congressman, you ask?

The Internal Revenue Service targeted liberal groups as well as conservatives seeking tax-exempt status, a Democratic congressman charged on Monday...

You didn't even read your own link?   So all the lying is from one demo congressman making up stuff.

What is the point of keeping this going??? You know you are wrong and showing everyone else how unreasonable you are. Are you just sabotaging yorur own credibility on purpose because you think it gets under my skin or something? Well, it doesn't, and I enjoy helping you trash your rep.  

Dane Allen wrote on 07/01/13 at 14:19:41:



OOoo really ... OK then try this - IG's own words - Republican IG's own words might I add -

He noted that his investigation, while still incomplete, found no evidence so far of intentional wrongdoing by IRS personnel, involvement by anyone outside the IRS or that targeting extended into other areas of the agency.

In that article by CNN - read it.

Yea and its time for you to post some fake BS by "associates press" and declare victory.


justin_o_guy2 wrote on 07/01/13 at 20:34:19:


The opposite of "targeting conservatives" isn't targeting liberals. The opposite of targetiung conservatives is - no we didn't target conservatives. Which ever you targeted was likely to land you in jail. Even if you target both.

The second thing  is - When conservatives found out they were targeted, they promptly pulled everyone into "questioning" not letting them look for evidence of targetting liberals. That's was the whole analogy of "screaming baby and you cant find the toy ... baby stopd screaming and you find it in a sec" ...

Sorry that IRS lie is one more ding in the credibility of anyone who hopes to blame the IRS for this and that now that they are set to enforce Obamacare.
You should bear in mind that Bush/cheney also had the IRS target NAACP and other liberal organisations. That was under a republican director which was appointed by Bush.
Republicans @ the center of this all the way.

Yea JOG time for you to crawl back into your "hold both feet to the fire" strategy.

Cool.
Srinath.

srinath wrote on 07/02/13 at 07:23:55:


Interesting, so in an article dated 6/24 the IG said his investigation is on going and then he issues a final notice letter to democrats on 6/27 with the results of the investigation and you can't figure out the timeline?

Ok, on the 24th the invetgation was ongoing, on the 27th the formal letter was sent with the results. Got it??

And, btw, I would take the word of Associated Press over CNN Politics any day!!  

Dane Allen wrote on 07/02/13 at 17:23:20:



Ha ha ha ... you put up atricles by the fake associates press ... the real associated press has nothing to do with your associates press.

24th, 27th ... and its still unrolling.
Your own IG said it was not political. Kapische ... The republican IG watchdog says it was not politically motivated.

Like I said drunks fail sobriety test man.

Putting a political application in a non political application causes them to be caught and scrutinized ... imagine that. What next, stoners failing drug tests ? Will this targeting never end ???

Cool.
Srinath.

srinath wrote on 07/03/13 at 07:06:05:


Way to tell it like it isn't. It's only real if you can twist it to your own use, right??? And everything else is fake. Riiiiiight

Quote:


Nice dodge, deflect, evade tactic there. Conservatives were targeted, liberals weren't.

Quote:


What is funny is you never seem to adress why only conservative groups were targeted as political and not of the liberal or progressive groups were targeted. Why did all the "political" liberal groups breeze through the system then?

Dane Allen wrote on 07/03/13 at 08:25:17:


Sorry dane, that's because it happened in your mind alone.
Not the real world.
I see Republicans offering excuses for other republicans ... and call it as I see it.
Cool.
Srinath.

srinath wrote on 07/03/13 at 12:52:45:


And where do you see it? Because Obama is President and he can't be tied to any scandal or because the perception is liberals are totally corrupt? Since there isn't any evidence you can provide I am curious how you can possibly extrapolate such a far off conclusion, especially when the ones committing the act admitted to and apologized for said act.