WebsterMark
Serious Thumper
Offline
SuzukiSavage.com Rocks!
Posts: 13895
Gender: 
|
There is a brand of people amongst us. They have no name but they exist. They are everywhere, at work, at home, at school, and in the streets, stores, and shopping malls. It is highly unlikely to not know someone who belongs in this category. It’s the so called non-conspiracy theorists. You know, the guy who tries to terminate conversations by alleging that you are nothing more than a “conspiracy theorist” and the information you share is false or not believable. Yes, that guy.
Yea, that guy is me but the next sentence is not.
Since they themselves refuse to look at the evidence, they put their faith in the government and in the mass corporate establishment to safely guide them in their reality.
In fact, I and most people I know who fall into the category of people who refuse to let tin hats like yourself perpetuate lies, don’t put their faith in government any more than the next person. Unlike tin hats however, we don’t put out faith in easily discredited YouTube videos and circumstantial evidence.
As proof; I offer Rat’s posting of a “newly found video on a camera from 9/11/2001 that just happened to have amazing footage of the WTC 7 building showing explosions going off in the windows proving demolition.....” Only an idiot or someone so predisposed to conspiracies could look at that video and not tell it was fake or at the very least, suspect something fishy going on and dig into a bit more. Finding a camera with a telling video on it 10 years after the fact didn’t raise your suspicions, but Rumsfeld leaving his office to see what happened after a plane crashed into the Pentagon is, in your view, is practically de facto evidence of involvement in a conspiracy?
As my second offering; I bring up Rat’s belief that it’s a feasible explanation that the reason why Ted Olson did not show ‘enough’ sorrow at the death of his wife Barbara, who was on the plane that hit the Pentagon is that she has similar characteristics to the woman he married afterwards. The possible explanation, according to Rat, is that she had plastic surgery and assumed the identity of this other woman. I’m sorry, but if you even thing this is a remote possibility, you have zero credibility going forward. Clearly, you are delusional.
My final objection is our other resident conspiracist JOG; who is so sure a plane did not fly into the Pentagon, but has not even read the report he argues against with all his might.
I and others have offered proof after proof, swatting away your silly ‘evidence’. You follow the same pattern in responding over and over: you try to broaden the specific topic and drag in unrelated events in an attempt to move away from facts you cannot argue your way out of. The devil is in the details and you run like a vampire from a cross when specific details are zeroed in on because they can't withstand the scrutiny.
The bottom line is I know more about the evidence of 9/11 than both of you put together because I actually consider both sides of the argument and have a more open mind than you.
In fact, let’s re-write that opening paragraph to reflect reality….
There is a brand of people amongst us. They have no name but they exist. They are everywhere, at work, at home, at school, and in the streets, stores, and shopping malls. It is highly unlikely to not know someone who belongs in this category. They are the conspiracy theorists. You know, the guy who is smarter than anyone else in the room; all evidence to the contrary. They terminate the conversation by alleging the rest of us are nothing more than tools being used by the rich Jews who secretly run the world. We are just not smart enough to pick out the facts from a mountain of data like they can. (See John Nash; A Beautiful Mind…) Yes, that guy.
|
Pages: 1
