Unfrick'nbelievable !!! ..... please remember, this is a full computer on a chip, complete with all functions inside this little square.

First Antutu benchmark tests are beginning to come in, and they are DRASTICALLY BETTER THAN EXPECTED.
Qualcomm said 40% better -- nope, try 50-60% better. This laps a lot of the low end "Intel Inside" stuff, btw.
This chip outperforms any other mobile chipset
and more than a few of Intel's laptop chipsets while being less than half the size and drawing half the power of any of the current compared against devices.
And that is when it is untuned and untweeked -- posted tweek results from Xiaomi are nearly
doubled and are being instantly dissed as "faked up" or "fudged" accordingly.
An updated & renovated Antutu test is coming out very shortly to remove any possible cheating concerns.However, folks are saying that when you apply a desktop class cooling system to the chipset, the Xiaomi test results might just be for real
if it is used in a static desktop device that has a chip cooling system, even one as simple as a heat sink and fan ....
https://www.nextpowerup.com/news/32922/xiaomi-mi-6-powered-by-snapdragon-835-... 
People are getting excited about the
AGE of the Snapdragon 835 and the wave of small light powerful devices it may wind up powering.
We can certainly see the Kirin 960 is being downsized and up-powered immediately (to 7-10nm ASAP) becoming the Kirin 980
just as soon as TSMC can make something up for samples. This is needed absolutely ASAP as the new up-powered Kirin 960 got badly upstaged, crushed, demolished by the Xiaomi 835 equipped Mi-6 in current generation Antutu testing.
Huawei simply isn't going to take being crushed lying down ..... Look for the Kirin 970 to ship later this spring with some interim A-73 improvements at 10-12nm as it shrinks all the way down to 7nm by this fall.
Ditto for Apple, the Snapdragon 835 just ate the soon to be released Apple A10 chipset alive and spit out all the bony pieces. Apple will wind up having a slack, sorry arsed first part of year this year in 2017
since it takes Apple most of a whole year to make enough chipsets to do an introduction wave on phones. Or else they will have to react, and have to cut the current generation off early by moving the A-11 up a year and wind up using the current A10 warehouse stocks somewhere else (in tablets or a low end laptop ???). It isn't a bad chip, but the wave caught up with it and passed it ....
Samsung is building the Qualcomm 835 so expect no reaction from Sammy, other than to use the 835 chip at first instead of trying to compete against it.
Also look to see all the rest of the crew come out with a up-speeded 7-10nm quad core A73 of some sort, as four Cortex A73s at 7-10nm draws so much less power than before that the use of the matching "littles" seem scarcely needed for any tablet, laptop, desktop or other non-handheld-phone usages.
Phones yes, you still get some significant big little battery life benefits with phones .....
but if you use the aluminum chassis as a large aluminum heat sink, then by golly you HAVE a heat sink and can tune the system speed accordingly.
Expect all the powerful chipset phones to do this even more than they do now.
If you have a design license, you can replace the on-die area currently used to support various sensors, gyros, etc (and the four littles) with 2-4 more A73s and
use the same die footprint and motherboard designs for a desktop only item. This way you can get to market faster with a more powerful "dedicated to the desktop" chipset.
..... can you say Chromebook? Sammy can, and did ..... showed off a pair of new ones at CES========================================
Watch out that you don't go get yourself Qualcommed by your own actions in overclocking a 835 product and making a toasted turd out of your product when it thermal fails on you due to completely natural production run variations.
Notice that this IS apparently a danger as Qualcomm has come out of the gate
VERY STRONGLY UNDERSTATING this Snapdragon 835's performance by a whole lot, and they did this very much on purpose for some known reasons.
Apparently there is a large range of "thermal performance" in this smaller lithography chipset's first production runs. IT IS BRAND NEW TURF after all and is full of unknown dangers at this point in time.
Overclocking a brand new phone chip is likely suicidal, you oriental phone guys know this, right? What makes you think the on board radio or the GPS can withstand the voltages and heat? They are NOT "germanium laced" chipset components after all .....
"Germanium laced" might indeed wind up being overclockable on the main CPU section, but let them end user hobby guys assume all those "toasted chicklet" risks.