Students should welcome racist, hate speech with open arms?...



When
Protesters are committing assault it's not protected speech, it's assault. When people are going to the emergency room,that's not the result of speech or protest, that is assault.


Students should welcome racist, hate speech with open arms?...

And what racist hate speech exactly are you referring to?
You can copy and paste what Trump said that you are so offended by. Otherwise the topic remains vague and nebulous. I suspect that the words that have caused you to see him as a monster are not being rightly viewed..


I have found some smaller, rather confusing bits in some of my traps. Bits of light cord, some yellow bits of what could almost pass for a delicate shag carpet. If I believed in unicorns I might wonder if possibly I'd almost snagged a Muppet..

Serowbot wrote on 07/02/16 at 18:17:56:


I agree with everyone having the right to disseminate their own beliefs.  However, when violence is involved or peoples rights convey a message are denied that is not free speech.

I didn't specify if the demonstration was at a university or not; although, the venue should make no difference.  They do not necessarily have to welcome narratives that they do not condone.  It does not give them the right to commit assault.  Walk right on by and pay no attention it you are not interested in the message, don't start beating the $hit out of people.

Who should decide what is appropriate?

Best regards,

Now I have JOG talking about Trump rallies... and PG saying he didn't specify universities...

The OP is an article about PC sensitivity on university campuses..
Not... Trump,...
Yes, on campus...
...and not physical assault...

Now who's worming around the topic?...

I fight alone here...outnumbered nearly every time, on every topic....
I won't run 5 directions at once, while you guys try to bend the topic to justify your position...

Of course, violent assault is wrong... (if you watched real news, you'd know Trump supporters have attacked protesters much more often and violently than the other way 'round...and Trump himself has encouraged it)...

In this forum, unlike the real America,... you outnumber reason...
In the real world,.. you don't.
Trump will lose,.. monumentally.. it will be a historic loss.
Hillary will win... she won't go to jail,.. as there is no crime... only a desperate search for one.
I understand... losers are bitter and angry...
..but if you want to take it out on me... I'm not playing...

Please consider your number advantage,.. before trying to drag me into multiple arguments at once.

To my understanding... the OP topic is PC censorship on college campus's... Not Trump, Not violence, and on campus...
I am on topic...

I don't have time to divide every topic into multiple subcategories...
If you want to surreptitiously drift topics to your agenda... play amongst yourselves...
You can always win that way... because you'll have no opposition.
Not like the real world...

Peace,
Serow.

PS,.. remember... all this matters not a wit...
What will be, will be...
...and it will effect us as individuals very little...
The sun will still rise in the morning and set in the eve...
We will still eat, drink, sleep, and love.
A serous plumbing problem, termite infestation, or storm,... a slip in the shower, road accident, or illness in the family, will affect us more who is President...

I'm here for entertainment,.. I ain't gonna' change the world on a motorcycle site...

Peace, again...
Sir-Rowboat

Sew wrote: Of course, violent assault is wrong... (if you watched real news, you'd know Trump supporters have attacked protesters much more often and violently than the other way 'round...and Trump himself has encouraged it)...

I don't want to drag this topic even further away but your statement above is not true, not even close. It's like saying Obama faces more verbal attacks than any other President. That's true if you forget about 8 years of Bush.

But lets move on.

Yes, Sew is alone at this table and he sits by the bathroom door so he can duck out from time to time. I've been accused of defending Sew and I have because we need him at the table. Yea, he's a friend of those long hair hippie-type, pinko fags and he's got a commie flag tacked up in his garage. He's torn Wallace stickers off the bumpers of cars and he voted for George McGovern for President. (apologies to Mr. Daniels)

We need more commie liberals at the table. That little girl Raven sat down for a while but she turned out to as dumb as a bag of hammers. Hovis pops over and takes a seat from time to time, Lost is lost most of the time, and a few others take a sip on their way out the door (how long can I keep this bat table analogy going) but we need a larger table.

The problem why few stay is the same reason there are no liberal talk radio shows that last. Liberal policies cannot stand up to sustained questioning. They're not built on logic, but emotion. It's the same reason why liberal TV shows do fine while a conservative TV talk show would bomb. Liberal TV shows last because the personalities of the hosts is what matters, not the meat of what they say.

Anyway, attack Sew all you want on his nation-killing ideas, but  at keast he sticks around. We really need more commies to take a seat and defend themselves.

Quote Mark:
"That little girl Raven sat down for a while but she turned out to as dumb as a bag of hammers."

She actually presented her opinions very intelligently and maturely...


Well, not bad, certainly considering the Colorado and California background and the young age.. I enjoyed her posts. She wasn't a Raven lunatic..


I really am good at that,,

If you call making $hit up intelligent..


I'm sure you have something in mind....

You do realize that you routinely debate politics, morality, and philosophy with a muppet,... right?...



WIN!!!...