justin_o_guy2 wrote on 07/29/16 at 05:50:07:Hollywood, people who live a make believe life, and have money.
They can afford to live a life where
Shoulds And Ought To's
Are what they focus on.
It Should be like This!
He ought to do things like that!
Liberals want to tell others how to live.
Conservatives are more, leave me alone.
Ohh, yeah, liberals can't differentiate between conservative s saying
Don't murder that baby .
Poorly worded, just got up..
Anyway, it's
Telling someone else how to live
not supporting abortion.
Bull nuts.
Stopping a murder is not telling anyone else how to live.
You're queers and you wanna live together?
Go get it. Don't worry about what I think, I don't care.
Marriage? Different story, it's a church thing, governments have no business being involved.
You don't wanna be a participant in a ceremony?
-Don't be..
But, the ShouldsNottas just eat liberals alive.
How THEY think You should and that other person Otta think and act , well, we just need a law.. to make you guys do it Right.
Of course, they are unwilling and unable to describe what society has to look like in order for them to be happy.
No, they are not smarter, nor are they more generous.
According to Google's figures, if donations to all religious organizations are excluded, liberals give slightly more to charity than conservatives do. But Mr. Brooks says that if measuring by the percentage of income given, conservatives are more generous than liberals even to secular causes.Dec 20, 2008
Let's see what they latch onto.
Funny, I kinda think it's the other way around.
Conservatives want to tell you how to live your most personal life
While liberals are live and let live and hell, even want to help you live.
Now liberals are more regulation friendly when it comes legal constructions of businesses, but usually, they are more pro free speech, (or at least used to be, there's a bit of a shift happening now)
on abortion, this is my official position, pro-choice, up til 24 weeks, up until then, it's no more ghastly than someone wanting to cut off their own foot, it's NOT something I'd support, but it ain't my foot. After 24 weeks only an extreme health case, mother or child.
but the government IS involved with licensing for marriage, and taxes are affected, and other benefits are affected for marriage, so, unfortunately JOG, marriage is a government issue, denying rights/privileges isn't constitutional under the 14th amendment (which I know has it's own contraversey about being an illegal amendment, but it's there)
on the hypocrisy of generosity, okay, what do you want me to do about it? my generosity can't even go on a tax return and because I'm NOT REGISTERED liberal or conservative, even if it was it wouldn't help.
are liberals smarter? the stats usually say they are more educated, and a "traditional liberal" education does make you question internal things beyond just technical expertise, like the study mythology and religious studies, cultural studies, anthropology, sociology, studying languages makes you rethink the cultural context of the interpretation of words, so a word you thought only meant one thing your whole life, you now know can actually be interpreted 3 different ways, so that's a bit eye opening, I think there's some value in that. Also, you learn business ethics, usually.
See, so it just goes to show you that two reasonably intelligent people can see the world in opposing ways.
Ideally, yes, less government is better, but that's only if people aren't ass-holes, but, people are ass-holes so some structure of authority is necessary.
Pages: 1 
