MnSpring wrote on 02/13/17 at 18:24:32:



LOL - what the heck is your point??  I said the exact same thing... smh

T And T Garage wrote on 02/13/17 at 19:59:59:

MnSpring wrote on 02/13/17 at 18:24:32:

[color=#0000ff]T And T Garage wrote on 02/12/17 at 19:14:20:

Good thing there is no such right, huh?

FREEDOM, of   Speech, is  a,
 RIGHT.Looting   Steeling,  Setting  Fires,  Destroying  Property,  Spouting  DEATH,  Treats,  Etc. Etc. Etc.
Is  Not even  CLOSE, to a  ‘right’.
Get on the Bus,
or stand inn the street and CRY !

LOL - what the heck is your point??  I said the exact same thing... smh

Let’s see.
You inferred I was talking to you directly ????
Not making a comment, on what you said ??????
More that one way to interrupt that  !

(Using a  word, another member often says)

Get a  Life,  ‘Pumpkin’, it ain’t all about,  YOU !  

MnSpring wrote on 02/14/17 at 19:41:32:


Then why the heck did you quote me sweetie??  LOL - you may want to think before you post next time...

Serowbot wrote on 02/15/17 at 11:10:33:



Understood.  I should have known better - my apologies.

Serowbot wrote on 02/15/17 at 11:10:33:

Terms like,.. Snowflake, sweetie, punkin, etc... are used to minimise the other person and are not allowed.
Continued use will result in deletions

Just so I get this straight.
If I say, ’Snowflake', in reference to frozen water falling from the sky, and accumulating on the ground, it is perfectly OK ?
If I say, ‘Pumpkin’, in reference to a fruit, made into pies, and a carved fruit, which is predominate at a certain time of the year, it is perfectly OK ?
If I say, “Sweetie”, in reference to a, wife, girl friend, or a attractive female, walking down the street, it is perfectly OK ?

Yet If I use those words to describe, (in my view), a person on this Forum. it is  NOT,  OK ?

How about those words, used to describe, the current  POTUS then.
When describing him, why are they, not, ‘bad’ also ?
Those are certainly stated, [b] in a Negative  way, and Certainly,   Do  NOT,
Treat each other as adults and with respective

Now how about,  ‘GAY’,  can I only use that to describe a person, who is, ‘Happy’, all the time ?
Yet, I cannot use it, to describe a person, who likes another person, of the same sex ?

A  Fox  guards a hen house, one set of rules.
A  Dog ‘trained' to guard chickens, guards the hen house, another set of rules,
A  Human with a Shotgun guards the hen house, a 3rd set of rules.
 Which Rule is it ????

And where will it end.
And who is, and is NOT, allowed,
to use words that,  'are used to minimize the other person',
which are used  frequently,
(Much, MUCH, More frequently, than, Snowflake, sweetie, punkin
in describing the current POTUS?)

Mn,..
The words are not banned.
Just don't use then against other members...

You can call Pelosi or Trump any name the site autosensor will allow you to post.
No name calling other members.
Calling other members names, makes ths an unpleasant place to be.
We don't want to drive people away from the site.

We're all friends here. Let's treat each other that way.
This is not about censorship, it's about mutual respect as fellow riders
Peace,
Serow

Serowbot wrote on 02/15/17 at 16:19:11:

The words are not banned.

We don’t want to drive people away from the site.

That is a  interesting point.

Their are the words, (Snowflake, sweetie, punkin)
That may, drive people away from the site.

Their are some that may be offended by the words,
Pork,  Flag,  Riots, Looting, etc.

Their are some that may be offended by the words,
like, (the ones used below), that  some members on this forum have used,
in describing the POTUS.
That may,  drive people away from the site.

You can call Pelosi or Trump any name the site autosensor will allow you to post.
No name calling other members.

       Score Card ?
Which words,  ‘offend’,  which  person?
So,  ANY  words describing, the POTUS, are  perfectly all right.
But certain words, if they are used,  
“ against other members…
are Not ?

How about, we ALL, stand by the credo:
 “ it’s about mutual respect “     ????
Concerning,  EVERYBODY ?

Now,  the,  ‘Freedom  Of  Speech’.

Call,  ‘Fire’ in a crowded place.
NA,  it ain’t gonna be a,  ‘Freedom’,  Because it can cause Bodily Harm !
Yet if I called you a, ’Snowflake’, No  Bodily harm,  just a  Opinion.
   (You don’t like it)
Exactly the SAME, as you calling  the POTUS a, “orangutan”. (Your  Opinion)
   ( I don’t like it)
Yet one is  allowed, and another one is not  ????


serial tweeter
a pot stirrer
partisan glasses
Tweetty
shows massive narcissism
eating what’s left of your brain
reality show, sexist, bully,
clinical symptoms of extreme narcissism
speaks at a 4th grade level and goes off half-cocked
dictate unconstitutional edicts
orange man with tiny hands
a dim, egomaniacal nut job
a self promoting, crass, uncultured, simpleton
grandiose ego
adolescent behavior
one religion to attack
no tolerance for criticism
narcissist
slogan slinging
nationalist
ego maniacal
race baiter
homophobe
constitution thumper
spoiled, silver spoon, man child
dye his face orange and comb over
the absurd POS we elected
Superficial
He would gold plate a turd
hail the princely orangutan
Trumpy Bird
can’t actually form a full sentence

(And this is  JUST   ONE,   page. !!!!!!!)

Please,  state the  rules?
Which words, and which person, that they refer to.
Are correct or not ?
Which words are: about mutual respect  ?

Serowbot wrote on 02/15/17 at 16:19:11:



Anyone unable to understand is being intentionally obtuse.
I agree and will do my best to comply.

This new and appreciated set of guidelines won't impact anyone's ability to make a point or be outspoken gadfly.
I did note with a true joy in my heart that Muppet was not included.

I would think that Snowflake or other derogatory terms can be used, as long as they are aimed at people Other than each other.
For instance,

The participants in the Million Pound March were all angry Snowflakes.

FWIW, I've experienced some real anger having been talked down to and called Punkin..
I didn't like it. I'm sure I've been guilty of a cheap shot or two.
I think this effort to enforce some civility is warranted.
So it is written, so it will be,
The Muppet has spoken, and wisely so.